You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Low End Sedans (under $16k)

3820 messages, Last post on Nov 24, 2008 at 9:45 AM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: backy (Apr 29, 2008 7:01 pm) Thanks for all the discussion! |
|
|
Replying to: kgambit (Apr 29, 2008 6:34 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Apr 29, 2008 5:05 pm) Yes, that is one reason I am driving a Mazda6 With moon roof (I think you mentioned them wanting that) and auto, invoice on the I-4 is right around $20K, so with $2500 rebate plus $1000 conquest rebate, should be able to get one for $16,500 or less. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: kgambit (Apr 29, 2008 6:34 pm) He ended up getting a 2001 Focus ZX3 with 85K mi for $4400, not a great deal but he hates shopping for cars, so he took it. He is 6' and is comfortable in it. Focus has average (average is pretty good these days) reliability, according to CR. I believe back in 2000-01 the Focus was also the top rated small car in CR road tests. I think youngsters find the ZX3 version more attractive than the sedan. I know my son did, as despite his aversion to car shopping, he went out of his way to find a ZX3 rather than settle for a sedan. |
|
|
Replying to: backy (Apr 29, 2008 7:01 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: micweb (Apr 30, 2008 8:05 am) Personally I'd get the ABS.
|
|
|
Replying to: backy (Apr 30, 2008 10:17 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: jacksan1 (Apr 30, 2008 2:58 pm) Here is what Edmunds has to say: Standardized performance testing showed the 2007 Nissan Versa improved with age. "At 16,000 miles the Versa's acceleration from zero to 60 mph took 9.4 seconds, 1/10th of a second quicker than during its first test at 1,000 miles. In the quarter-mile, the Versa lost 2/10ths of a second and more than 2 mph, recording a final mark of 17.2 seconds at 80.2 mph. "Most remarkable is the Versa's improvement in braking performance. The distance required to stop from 60 mph shrank from 152 feet to 135 feet. We attribute this to normal brake pad break-in and the lack of optional ABS on our Versa. As a side note, an ABS-equipped 2007 Nissan Versa in a prior test needed only 123 feet to stop." So the improvement in braking performance is substantial, and I can't explain Consumer Reports results - maybe they test performance parameters first. Backy was right, that the ABS version is a better stopped from the get-go. |
|
|
|
|
I went with the folks today on two test drives, of the cars listed in the subject line. The Scion: Quick enough, about the same about of noise as the Civic mom and dad currently drive, although my head was in the ceiling in the back seat. I never actually drove either of them, but mom and dad's comments said a lot. The room was ok-ish, the stereo was great, and they felt this car was the best they had driven (effectively writing the Accent off their list). The Versa: We went by the Nissan dealer nearby, and drove a Versa S, with the Power Package ($15,400 MSRP). The Versa had enough room for me to sit in the back seat with the front seat all the way back, and my head was out of the roof. The 4-speed automatic was smooth, and the interior was quieter than the Civic. They are excited about the Versa, and will likely go back to drive a CVT model, so that they can get the center armrest. He's just not sure about the CVT yet. Frankly, the Versa caught them by surprise, especially since I practically made them stop by and look at it.
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (May 03, 2008 4:17 pm) Plus there's many other comfort/convenience features in the SL, including a rear center armrest. If they do mostly highway driving, they might prefer the S with its 4AT. In tests done by C/D, the 4AT got better fuel economy on the highway than the CVT.
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2005 Toyota ECHO
2010 Chevrolet Aveo
2009 Kia Rio
2010 Nissan Sentra
2010 Honda Fit
2010 Hyundai Accent
2010 Toyota Yaris
2009 Kia Spectra
2008 Suzuki Forenza



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats