Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Low End Sedans (under $16k)
3820 messages, Last post on Nov 24, 2008 at 9:45 AM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: bobw3 (Dec 19, 2006 12:55 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: backy (Dec 19, 2006 1:02 pm) Imagine if the seat were completely verticle (uncomforatble), then the back of your head would touch the headrest because they're both vertical. With the seat reclined and the headrest at the same angle of the seat, you have to tilt your head forward to see forward, and the more you tilt your head forward, the greater the distance to the headrest. If you try it in extreme vertical/angled position you can really see the difference. I had a Mazda RX-7 and the headrest could be manually tilted foward, so when you're sitting at an angle you could move the headrest so it's closer to the back of your head. In my Freestyle when I'm sitting more upright, I can feel the headrest against the back of my head (probably why the Freestyle received a Good rear rating).
|
|
|
Replying to: bobw3 (Dec 19, 2006 1:13 pm) I suspect the main reason these cars didn't get good rear crash ratings overall (except the Versa) is that the headrests aren't moveable fore/aft, actively or manually. |
|
|
Replying to: bobw3 (Dec 19, 2006 1:13 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: backy (Dec 19, 2006 12:41 pm) That's disgusting for an auto company to do. For over a year Hyundai portrayed the Accent to unsuspecting buyers to be one of the safest cars in its class, yet knew of its serious shortcomings and still didn't attempt to fix them. How anyone could have faith in the brand is beyond me. Also, shame on the IIHS for not releasing these scores for such a long time.
|
|
|
Replying to: germancarfan1 (Dec 20, 2006 8:30 am) http://www.iihs.org/ratings/head_restraints/headrestraints.aspx?cadillac and Chevy Cavalier for getting Poor front crash ratings for the past 10 years http://www.iihs.org/ratings/ratingsbyseries.aspx?id=294 and for Chevy Impala, Silverado, Trailblazer and Uplander for getting Poor ratings on rear crash tests http://www.iihs.org/ratings/head_restraints/headrestraints.aspx?chevrolet And every Buick for getting Poor rear scores: http://www.iihs.org/ratings/head_restraints/headrestraints.aspx?buick And Lexus ES 330, GX 470, and RX for getting Poor rear impact scores. http://www.iihs.org/ratings/head_restraints/headrestraints.aspx?lexus |
|
|
Replying to: bobw3 (Dec 20, 2006 8:51 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: bobw3 (Dec 20, 2006 8:51 am) 2. Rear impact tests are far less important then front and side impact. The vast majority of cars receive Marginal to Poor rear impact scores, though only few receive both adequate frontal and poor side impact scores. 3. Would you like to enlighten us about what Lexus and the Buick got for front and side impact scores? I didn't think so. ) Hyundai set itself up for failure. It made unsubstantiated claims that the Accent was one of the safest cars in the class and it didn't deliver. No one else is responsible except for Hyundai. |
|
|
Replying to: backy (Dec 20, 2006 8:59 am)
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2005 Toyota ECHO
2010 Chevrolet Aveo
2009 Kia Rio
2010 Nissan Sentra
2010 Honda Fit
2010 Hyundai Accent
2010 Toyota Yaris
2009 Kia Spectra
2008 Suzuki Forenza
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
