You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Low End Sedans (under $16k)

3820 messages, Last post on Nov 24, 2008 at 9:45 AM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: alpha01 (Dec 19, 2006 12:21 pm) A couple other things I found interesting: both the Versa and Fit were tested with last-minute mods, in fact the Fit was actually re-tested with modified airbag programming when the driver's front bag fired late in the initial test. To Honda's and Nissan's credit, they made fixes quickly. But buyers of Fits and Versas made before the dates noted in the IIHS report should be sure they get the fixes--the report noted Honda has initiated a customer action to fix their cars. |
|
|
Replying to: bobw3 (Dec 19, 2006 12:27 pm) Dynamic ratings: Seat/head restraints with geometry rated good or acceptable (current and recent model cars) are tested in a simulated rear impact conducted on a sled to assess how well the seats support the torso, neck, and head of a BioRID dummy. http://www.iihs.org/ratings/head_restraints/head_restraint_info.html So there's actually two rear tests: a geometric (measurements only) test, and a dynamic test (impact test on a sled). If the car is reated Marginal or Poor for Geometry, they don't even get a Dynamic test--they are scored "Poor" on the rear test. So the Geometry test is a test of head restraints, but the Dynamic test goes to testing the entire seat and the affect on the upper body.
|
|
|
Replying to: backy (Dec 19, 2006 12:41 pm) While its certain they crash their vehicles, why release a car whose ratings you know may be bottom of the barrel? Definitely left scratching my head.... One final note- in almost all the small cars tested, the dummy's head struck the steering wheel through the airbag, enough so to actually bend the Yaris' (which apparently didn't majorly affect HIC or Peak Gs, because it still received an 'Acceptable). ~alpha
|
|
|
Replying to: backy (Dec 19, 2006 12:47 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: alpha01 (Dec 19, 2006 12:51 pm) Yeah, mine too. You'd think Hyundai would have learned something through their experience with the IIHS frontal crash tests on the Gen 3 Elantra. They obviously know how important crash safety and crash tests are. They tout their safety features continually, and whenever one of their vehicles does well in a crash test they tell the world about it. So either their engineers who do their own crash tests are incompetent, or the execs who approved the release of the Accent knowing what it would get on the IIHS tests are to blame. If it's correctable, Hyundai/Kia had better act fast. |
|
|
Replying to: bobw3 (Dec 19, 2006 12:55 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: backy (Dec 19, 2006 1:02 pm) Imagine if the seat were completely verticle (uncomforatble), then the back of your head would touch the headrest because they're both vertical. With the seat reclined and the headrest at the same angle of the seat, you have to tilt your head forward to see forward, and the more you tilt your head forward, the greater the distance to the headrest. If you try it in extreme vertical/angled position you can really see the difference. I had a Mazda RX-7 and the headrest could be manually tilted foward, so when you're sitting at an angle you could move the headrest so it's closer to the back of your head. In my Freestyle when I'm sitting more upright, I can feel the headrest against the back of my head (probably why the Freestyle received a Good rear rating).
|
|
|
Replying to: bobw3 (Dec 19, 2006 1:13 pm) I suspect the main reason these cars didn't get good rear crash ratings overall (except the Versa) is that the headrests aren't moveable fore/aft, actively or manually. |
|
|
Replying to: bobw3 (Dec 19, 2006 1:13 pm) |
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2005 Toyota ECHO
2010 Chevrolet Aveo
2009 Kia Rio
2010 Nissan Sentra
2010 Honda Fit
2010 Hyundai Accent
2010 Toyota Yaris
2009 Kia Spectra
2008 Suzuki Forenza



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats