Sign In Join 



Mercedes-Benz CLK (2005 and earlier)

1627 messages,  Last post on Jan 10, 2009 at 4:20 AM

You are in the Mercedes-Benz CLK Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class, Coupe, Convertible


Messages Page 63 of 164
1
...
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
...
164
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#612 of 1627
more extended warranty discussion by chowchow3
Nov 13, 2001 (6:27 pm)
Reply
I saw two messages (#568 and 569) talking about extended warranties. I talked to my neighbor who is on her 3rd MB. She never knew there was extended warranties. (A fine example of educated consumers) However, she did repeated said how expensive repairs are and for the price she would definitely buy it if she plans to keep her cars longer than the original warranty period.
 
I conducted an unscientific poll by walking around 2 MB lots - most of the newer used cars have around 45K miles on them. I wonder if there is any coincidence - sell them before warranty runs out.
 
However, here's the most important thing - is the warranty price negotiable? The brochure said $2500 for the 4yr/50K but I think jjpeter said he got it for $2200. Don't tell me - it also depends on which area of the country you are buying your car.
 
Thanks guys. This board ROCKS!!!
 
P.S. My car will be born next wk. Just in time for Christmas.
#613 of 1627
Warranty by jrct9454
Nov 14, 2001 (5:38 am)
Reply
The cost of the warranty is up to the dealer - he pays a certain level of $, and is then free to charge whatever the local market will bear. On the mainline C forum board, you'll find a number of references to the dealer in Chico, CA, who has built a reputation for selling the warranty at reasonable prices.
 
The warranty can be purchased from any dealer in the country...all same-o. Make a few phone calls and save some money.
#614 of 1627
Wiper vs. Safety by huntzinger
Nov 14, 2001 (6:04 am)
Reply
Strictly speaking, so long as a vehicle is equipped with dual outside mirrors, the vehicle's rear window can be blocked, but it is not considered to be a safety deficiency. Otherwise, no one would ever be allowed to tow a trailer.
 
And for a cost estimate, Porsche charged $307 for their rear wiper option on last year's 911. IMO, this is not out of line.
 
-hh
#615 of 1627
Strictly speaking... by jrct9454
Nov 14, 2001 (6:22 am)
Reply
...there is no reason for ABS, ESP, head bags, or side bags, either, to make a vehicle that is considered "safe".
 
Clearly, if this item is a show-stopper for some of you, then this is the wrong car for you and should be crossed off your list.
 
It's on my list for a lot of good reasons. And my only argument with this thread is that in 35 years of dealing with Mercedes, I have never known them to short a particular model on the basic safety list to "save money". They sincerely believe that the angle of the window and characteristics of the wind flow over this car make the wiper unnecessary. It's not as if it didn't come up - it was specifically discussed in the press interviews at the time of the car's intro in Germany. If there are real-world complaints about this [as opposed to theoretical objections from non-owners], you can believe DB will react appropriately. I've never heard this issue raised in any of the English-language reviews [or translated articles] I've read.
 
I've been a tough critic of this company and some of its recent missteps...I continue to believe this issue isn't one of them, but if it is to you, then this car won't be right. Vive la competition...
#616 of 1627
Convertible C-Sport. by jcb_digger
Nov 14, 2001 (7:25 am)
Reply
Yes, the picture is real - Karmann came up with it as a concept vehicle for the 71st International Motor Show in Geneva.

Sadly, MB decided not to go ahead (probably too much competition for the CLK).

Read more at:-

http://mbspy.bacosys.be/w203karmann.htm

Regards, JohnB

#617 of 1627
goodness! by pocmonster
Nov 14, 2001 (9:45 am)
Reply
the convertible is sooooo sweet. don't condemn me for saying this, but i actually think the convertible is a lot prettier than the coupe.
#618 of 1627
I agree by jjpeter
Nov 14, 2001 (10:46 am)
Reply
That convertable prototype is sweet. Takes away some of the heft of the butt end of the C230K. Looks somewhat like the VW cabriolet. Not that I'm a convertable buyer, heck I didn't even opt for the sun roof on our C230! But this unit would sell, looks even better then the SLK.
#619 of 1627
#584 by huntzinger
Nov 14, 2001 (1:18 pm)
Reply
If there are real-world complaints about this [as opposed to theoretical objections from non-owners], you can believe DB will react appropriately. I've never heard this issue raised in any of the English-language reviews [or translated articles] I've read.
 
It would be nice if MB had an obvious email address for product feedback. FWIW, I have heard the issue raised in English...probably in AutoWeek
 
I'll add a clause on my purchase contract that states that if MB comes out with a wiper on a future model, they agree that they will retrofit it onto my car for $400. Afterall, all contracts are negotiable
 
-hh
#620 of 1627
rear wiper by ranchero
Nov 14, 2001 (2:58 pm)
Reply
I've bought one of these cars. The lack of a rear wiper bothers me not one bit (though I live in the mountain west). The critics of the lack of this as standard or optional equipment are wrong and maybe lazy too.
 
First of all, why leave a Mercedes parked outside overnight? Is it laziness or lack of a garage? If it is lack of a garage, then don't buy a Mercedes. Keep something more plebian outside in the winter. I can't imagine a decision to buy any new Mercedes without a safe, secure overnight garage for the car.
 
Now why complain about the lack of a wiper on the rear window when the car has gotten an overnight coat of snow (and the ice underneath)? A great way to damage a wiper mechanism is to try to remove accumulated snow & ice from a parked car by simply getting in the car and turning on the wipers. The right way to do it is to remove the crud with a scraper. Get the stuff off your side windows too while you are at it! But don't rely on wipers to remove an accumulation of snow and ice. Do it right!
 
As to a rear wiper itself. Please note the configuration of the car. It has a sloped rear window like the CLK coupe. Furthermore it has that (some may think is "cute") kammback. While these features do not keep falling snow off the window, they should work to keep winter road grime off your backlite. That is what a rear wiper is meant to remove! The Sport Coupe is unlike a wagon. A Mercedes or Volvo wagon, with a more vertical rear window and without any structural "dam" to keep road grime away, is quite likely to pick up a lot of greasy, dirty winter road grit. Nothing in the design of a wagon blocks this goop from your window. So a wiper is fitted to do the job. But on the C230K Sport Coupe, this is clearly not the needed. The rear window is much removed from the source of this road grime problem.
 
Finally, do note that the car does have a heated rear window. Even in a heavy snowstorm, this should serve well enough to melt snow picked up while moving slowly in heavy traffic. Use it!
 
I can see why Mercedes did not deem the rear wiper a feature that would be needed on the car. If the lack of the rear window wiper will make a potential buyer buy a Daewoo or Hyundai that has a wiper, I say go for it. Geez, you can probably even get a better warranty from the Koreans too. I will take the Mercedes, wiper or not! And I trust Mercedes if they decide I don't need the wiper.
#621 of 1627
I hope by tommyp13
Nov 14, 2001 (5:09 pm)
Reply
that the "if you don't have a garage, don't get a Mercedes" comment was just a bad joke, and not some misguided a-hole snobbery comment. Many people don't have a garage. If it wasn't a joke, get a life. It's that kind of attitude that makes people dislike MB, BMW, and Porsche owners in the first place.
 
I still think that the wiper thing is much ado about nothing, but I don't want to jinx myself when I go through my first freezing rainstorm, so I'll have to say that I'm reserving judgment until I go through some bad weather and still don't need the rear wiper.

Messages Page 63 of 164
1
...
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
...
164
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement