Sign In Join 



Mazda Protegé

24037 messages,  Last post on Nov 14, 2009 at 11:55 PM

You are in the Mazda Protege Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Mazda Protege, Sedan


Messages Page 2402 of 2404
1
...
2398
2399
2400
2401
2402
2403
2404
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#24007 of 24037
A question in whose mind? by autonomous
Jun 10, 2008 (9:24 am)
Reply
My wife keeps going back and forth on the issue. "Do we want another car payment? (My Accord has one more payment.) "Do we want something bigger that takes more gas to fill?" etc. Plus, she says people have sedans and babies all the time. When I say lets get rid of her car and get a bigger sedan so at least we both have comfortable cars, she doesn't want to do that either. To be honest, i am not sure when she wants to get rid of it all of a sudden.
 
It appears from what you have posted that your wife is not the undecided one. She is pretty clearly saying that the Protege is fine for now. The right answer to practice is "that's fine, whatever you say".
#24008 of 24037
A question in who's mind? by fowler3
Jun 10, 2008 (1:09 pm)
Reply
Autonomous: There are several options here you should take time to think about. 1) The Accord is almost paid for.; 2) You could save the payments for a future trade up.; 3) Do with what you have until the gas problem settles.; and 4) Plan for your next car as if it will be the one you drive for a long time. Be sure it meets your needs.
 
Generally, the small cars offered today don't seem to get any better fuel economy than the Protegé, maybe one mile per gallon more. My 2001 gets 26mpg city and 34mpg highway. Highest 36mpg. The seats are firm, but softer tires when replacing the Bridgestones made a hugh difference. Check Khumo touring tires.
#24009 of 24037
New cars, old debate by autonomous
Jun 12, 2008 (1:29 pm)
Reply
Autonomous: There are several options here you should take time to think about. I'm puzzled, fowler3, why you are addressing these points to me. If I read Dave's message correctly, it is he that wants a new car ... it is not me (and apparently not his wife).
 
Further to your pertinent point about fuel economy, you may want to check out the current Consumer Reports issue which reviews some excellent choices that offer real (25+%) improvements in fuel efficiency over our Proteges: the Elantra, the Corolla, the Prius, even the Mazda3 manual transmission. On the other hand, considering all of the attention in recent years on fuel economy I must declare that these improvements still have a long way to go. One area that disturbs is the continuing girth of cars. Several questions arise. Why do cars have to keep on getting bulkier and heavier? For example, why is the Mazda3s about 10% heavier than a Protege5? Why not feed our need for speed by lightening the vehicles? Why not advertise the weight savings as part of the performance enhancements? I will now leave the podium ...
#24010 of 24037
Old debate and wrong debater by fowler3
Jun 12, 2008 (4:06 pm)
Reply
Autonomous: I got confused too that's why one reply addresses you. It isn't always clear who to reply to with these things. Add to that Apple's screwed up email app and you can see where it comes from.
 
I agree there are more up-to-date compact cars which get better mileage than our Protegés. The Mazda3 is one IF you go for the manual tranny, I didn't on the Pro. Another thing about the MZ3 it's suppose to be bigger, yet I can barely get into it, and very comfortable in the old model. It strikes me as a car Mazda designed for purformance at all costs regardless of passenger comfort. If the buyer is too big go elsewhere. I'm 5' -11" 150 pounds.
 
With reports the cost of oil will hit $200 a barrel I still see no need in trading. If you add the additional costs of insurance and local taxes to the difference in costs of the cars, it's a no-brainer. When you buy a better car you cannot buy insurance at the same premium you had on the older car.
 
My Pro is clean, no dings, clean inside, and only 34,580 miles. Still on second tires.
 
What I DID DO was sell my townhouse and move to an apartment closer to the services I need daily. Now, I use about four gallons a week instead of 10 gallons.
#24011 of 24037
Re: New cars, old debate [autonomous] by maltb
Jun 13, 2008 (10:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: autonomous (Jun 12, 2008 1:29 pm)

Why do cars have to keep on getting bulkier and heavier? For example, why is the Mazda3s about 10% heavier than a Protege5? Why not feed our need for speed by lightening the vehicles? Why not advertise the weight savings as part of the performance enhancements? I will now leave the podium ...
 
How many air bags, side impact beams and ABS actuators did the older cars have? Also, how well did those manual windows and vents w/o AC work? Manufacturers have made significant gains in weight reduction but the list of standard equipment seems to grow faster. Not to mention, cars have more integration yet get cheaper (relative to inflation).
 
I'd like to have a car as comfortable as a Rolls, as roomy as an Excursion, as fast as a Bugatti, the towing capacity of an F550, and the economy of a Smart. When can i get it?
#24012 of 24037
Re: New cars, old debate [maltb] by autonomous
Jun 13, 2008 (12:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: maltb (Jun 13, 2008 10:58 am)

I'd like to have a car as comfortable as a Rolls, as roomy as an Excursion, as fast as a Bugatti, the towing capacity of an F550, and the economy of a Smart.
 
How about the Mini Clubman? I was rereading the June 2008 hatchbacks issue of Consumer Reports and noted the following stats about the mighty mite:
weight: 2780 lbs. for the automatic;
acceleration 0 to 60 in 9.7 sec.;
braking 60-0 in 128 ft.
overall mpg: 29
price: $24,700.
 
My verdict: interesting if pricy package .
#24013 of 24037
Yes, we can [fowler3] by autonomous
Jun 13, 2008 (12:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fowler3 (Jun 12, 2008 4:06 pm)

What I DID DO was sell my townhouse and move to an apartment closer to the services I need daily. Now, I use about four gallons a week instead of 10 gallons
 
Kudos to you, fowler3! That makes so much sense that you'll end up saving dollars.
#24014 of 24037
1992 Protege Emission failing by phteo
Jun 15, 2008 (10:53 pm)
Reply
I have a 1992 Mazda protege 1.8L Manual Transmission. First Emission test HC Cruise limit 170 pass at 98, Idle limit 220 pass at 198. CO Cruise Limit 1.2 pass at 0.33, Idle limit 1.2 failed at 1.79.
After I replace spark plus (found one cracked when I took it out), replace Rotor and Distributors. I did not replace Wires, they are fairly new-3 years and in great condition.
But second test result got worse:
HC Cruise limit 170 pass at 31 --much better, Idle limit 220 failed at 223.
CO Cruise Limit 1.2 pass at 0.09 --much better, Idle limit 1.2 failed at 2.53.
Both idle condition are much worse. I drove (at 9am) to the test center about 5 miles from my home after I replaced the parts a night before.
#24015 of 24037
Re: 1992 Protege Emission failing [phteo] by autonomous
Jun 16, 2008 (2:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: phteo (Jun 15, 2008 10:53 pm)

You may want to consider a motorvac fuel system treatment. This is a fuel system purge and fuel system service to remove internal carbon build up and combustion byproducts. It should restore fuel efficiency and engine performance.
#24016 of 24037
2003 Protege by orlandom28
Jun 17, 2008 (2:31 pm)
Reply
I have a check engine light on...I went to auto zone and recieved P code P0171..fuel system too leen....my car has been stalling and getting crappy gas milage..please advise...Thanks

Messages Page 2402 of 2404
1
...
2398
2399
2400
2401
2402
2403
2404
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement