Sign In Join 



4WD & AWD systems explained

1376 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 9:11 AM

You are in the SUVs Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Suburban, Jeep Grand Cherokee, Subaru Outback, Ford Explorer, Nissan Pathfinder, GMC Envoy, Performance Mods, Tires, Suspension, Transmission, Truck, SUV


Messages Page 136 of 138
1
...
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1351 of 1376
Re: Chevy Suburban 2006 LTZ [arrie] by ateixeira
Mar 30, 2009 (11:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: arrie (Mar 30, 2009 10:07 am)

The differential between axles takes care of the axle speed matching for all conditions so there is no need to disengage.
 
That assumes there exists a center diff at all.
 
The Honda CR-V uses a rotary blade coupling but it doesn't really have a true center diff. The rear axle disengages instead. That's why it's only a part-time system.
#1352 of 1376
Re: Chevy Suburban 2006 LTZ [ateixeira] by arrie
Mar 31, 2009 (4:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Mar 30, 2009 11:37 am)

To make it clear.
 
AWD means there IS A CENTER DIFFERENTIAL, PERIOD.
 
4WD has transfer case which has two output shafts. One goes to front axle differential and the other to rear axle differential. When both output shafts are coupled to work it means that front and rear axles are turning at the same speed (if tires are designed to be same diameter as usually is the case) and this means that both front and rear tires should be exactly the same diameter under any driving conditions. Well, front and rear tires practically never are the same diameter and that is the problem. Different tire radius on road side of the axle means tire speed against road surface is different. This makes one of the axles pull the car and the other to slow it down.
 
If Honda CR-V has a rotary blade coupling in the drive shaft going to rear axle it means it is a 4WD system with an automatically or manually controlled coupling that engages rear wheels when it is necessary. It is not an AWD system as what AWD is originally meant to be.
 
Arrie
#1353 of 1376
Re: Chevy Suburban 2006 LTZ [arrie] by rsholland
Mar 31, 2009 (5:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: arrie (Mar 31, 2009 4:56 pm)

Well, Honda doesn't refer to their CVR [AWD? / 4WD?] system as AWD. They call it "Real-Time 4WD."
 
Bob
#1354 of 1376
Re: Chevy Suburban 2006 LTZ [arrie] by steve_ HOST
Mar 31, 2009 (7:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: arrie (Mar 31, 2009 4:56 pm)

AWD means there IS A CENTER DIFFERENTIAL, PERIOD.
  
4WD has transfer case

 
What about a hybrid with electric motors at each drive wheel? Now that's real four/all wheel drive, complete with lots of torque at any speed.. And you know they are coming.
#1355 of 1376
Re: Chevy Suburban 2006 LTZ [steve_] by arrie
Apr 01, 2009 (8:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Mar 31, 2009 7:08 pm)

Yes,
 
separate electric motor on each wheel would be the best, just like it is already done using hydraulic motors in some earth moving heavy machines.
 
That system would be a really good solution as electric motors waste very little power compared to mechanical gears that lose 1 - 2 % of input power at each gear mesh. This lost power of course is the reason why transmissions get so hot.
 
Problem with electric motors is though that for slow speed motor diameter gets very big if it is connected directly to the wheel hub. This means that to keep electric motor physical size small enough a gear reducer has to be fitted in and the mechanical power loss is back.
 
AWD name probably originally came from All time 4WD as differential between axles makes it a true 4WD but as that name was already in use something else had to me made to differentiate between the two.
 
Arrie
#1356 of 1376
Re: Chevy Suburban 2006 LTZ [arrie] by steve_ HOST
Apr 01, 2009 (6:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: arrie (Apr 01, 2009 8:06 am)

This means that to keep electric motor physical size small enough a gear reducer has to be fitted in and the mechanical power loss is back.
 
There's always a gotcha.
#1357 of 1376
Re: Chevy Suburban 2006 LTZ [arrie] by ateixeira
Apr 03, 2009 (10:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: arrie (Mar 31, 2009 4:56 pm)

I think your definitions worked ... 15 years ago.
 
Now there are many system that do not meet either of your definitions.
 
The RX400H is one.
 
There is no center diff, so it's not AWD.
 
There is no transfer case, so it's not 4WD.
 
What is it, then?
 
We can no longer adhere to traditional definitions for AWD and 4WD when they just do not fit modern technology.
 
A separate electric motor is used for the rear axle. There is no 2nd driveshaft connecting the rear axle to the front axle, hence no center diff is needed.
 
This is what I would call a "through the road" AWD system. The only link from the front axle to the rear axle is the fact that the tires are on the ground.
 
That's still AWD, though, so your "no center diff" rule fails.
#1358 of 1376
Re: Chevy Suburban 2006 LTZ [ateixeira] by arrie
Apr 03, 2009 (5:02 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Apr 03, 2009 10:55 am)

A real AWD with electric motor running rear axle?
 
First of all, I was talking about mechanically drive axles. Secondly, you could think of the electrical power output as a differential between axles, i.e. electric control allows for the speed difference between axles without danger of breaking drive system parts when driving on dry pavement.
 
What power rating does the electric motor for the rear axle have?
 
Arrie
#1359 of 1376
Re: Chevy Suburban 2006 LTZ [arrie] by ateixeira
Apr 10, 2009 (11:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: arrie (Apr 03, 2009 5:02 pm)

That's just it, you have to qualify the definitions.
 
I'm gonna guess the rear axle gets about 40hp or the equivalent nowadays, probably less when the original Highlander Hybrid came out. Torque is better and peaks just off idle, though.
 
Funny thing is it was based on a FWD Highlander, not the AWD model.
 
I saw a cut-away at an auto show and studied it closely, it was just .... odd.
#1360 of 1376
Re: Chevy Suburban 2006 LTZ [steve_] by kdshapiro
Apr 19, 2009 (12:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Mar 31, 2009 7:08 pm)

I don't think electric motors at every wheel could contribute anything more than neglibile torque. There is a reason 28KV are used to run electric locomotives on the nations commuter railroads.

Messages Page 136 of 138
1
...
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement