Sign In Join 



Subaru Crew Photo Gallery

2660 messages,  Last post on Sep 30, 2009 at 9:38 AM

You are in the Subaru Crew Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru, Sedan, Wagon




Your Community Leaders are ateixeira and rsholland.


Messages Page 261 of 266
1
...
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
...
266
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2601 of 2660
Re: VDC 50%? [paisan] by rsholland
Feb 18, 2007 (11:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: paisan (Feb 18, 2007 11:22 am)

No, it's not via braking. Here are some links that can explain it better than I can.
 
http://www.acura.com/index.aspx?initPath=RDX_Learn_FeaturesOptions_Performance_S- HAWD_SHAWDOverview
 
http://world.honda.com/HDTV/news/2004-4040401a/
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SH-AWD
 
Bob
#2602 of 2660
SH-AWD, VDC by c_hunter
Feb 18, 2007 (2:02 pm)
Reply
Bob has it right. SH-AWD "overdrives" the outside rear when cornering (via gear multiplication). The outside rear wheel spins faster and steers the back end through the turn, offsetting the inherent understeer in the vehicle. It works very well, and feels cool. The catch is that you need to power through corners to kick it in, and it takes some experimentation to find the sweet spot. It's very similar to modulating throttle to control over/understeer on a RWD vehicle.
 
Regarding VDC-AWD, I believe it does away with limited slip diffs, instead using open diffs and the application of brakes (traction control) to clamp down on spinning wheels. As you probably know, the benefit of a LSD is that it mechanically transfers power from a spinning wheel over to the other wheel on the axle, thus conserving 100% of the power that goes to the axle (it all goes to the wheel with traction in the event that one wheel slips).
 
With the open diffs in VDC, the brakes clamp down on a spinning wheel and there is no mechanism to transfer that wheel's power over to the other wheel. Thus, only 50% of the power going to the axle can get put down to the road when one wheel slips. Now, VDC has some smarts, and it will hunt around for traction by braking/releasing slipping wheels. But in that situation, no more than 50% of the power going to an axle gets to the road compared to the 100% an LSD can manage.
 
Craig
#2603 of 2660
Re: SH-AWD, VDC [c_hunter] by paisan
Feb 18, 2007 (2:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: c_hunter (Feb 18, 2007 2:02 pm)

With the open diffy, when the spinning wheel is braked, 100% of the power from that axle goes to the other wheel. That's the difference between the traditional LSD and the ABLS, at least in the VDC implementation on my Armada that's how it works. I can't vouche for the implementation on the subarus however. The downside is that it's slower to engage and in a "performance" situation it will overheat the brake fluid as it did on the AMG E55 on Pocono East when they had it there at one of our HPDEs. The SH-AWD seems cool and I'll definitely check out those links.
 
-mike
#2604 of 2660
Re: SH-AWD, VDC [paisan] by c_hunter
Feb 18, 2007 (3:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: paisan (Feb 18, 2007 2:55 pm)

I guess I am not sure how ABLS works on your Nissan -- on any system that uses "only" brakes to clamp down on a spinning wheel, you automatically lose the power going to that braked wheel unless something else is there to transfer it. All braking is doing is preventing 100% of the power from leaking out of the spinning wheel, but it cannot send that wheel's power to the other wheel (so at best, braking saves the other wheel's 50%). A mechanical LSD uses a viscous coupling, planetary gearset, or clutches to re-route power from the spinning wheel to the other wheel. So if ABLS is sending power from the spinning wheel to the other wheel, it must have additional electro/mechanical components that function like a LSD. That would not be surprising, as modern AWD systems are quite sophisticated nowadays.
 
As far as I know, Subaru's diffs are open with VDC-AWD and there is nothing else to flip power to the other side.
 
The reason the simple braked systems do heat up is that the brakes are resisting some or all of that 50% power to the spinning wheel. I guess that's a good way to categorize the systems. If they don't heat the brakes, then some other mechanism is transferring the power away from that wheel. If they do heat up the brakes, then the brakes are eating that wheel's 50% power.
#2605 of 2660
Re: SH-AWD, VDC [c_hunter] by paisan
Feb 18, 2007 (3:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: c_hunter (Feb 18, 2007 3:50 pm)

Hmm weird because I was under the impression with an open diffy 100% of the power could go to either side, and would take the path of least resistance, ie: 100% would go to the slipping wheel rather than the gripping wheel.
 
-Mike
#2606 of 2660
Re: SH-AWD, VDC [paisan] by c_hunter
Feb 18, 2007 (6:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: paisan (Feb 18, 2007 3:59 pm)

In an open diff setup, either wheel can get up to 50% of the max torque sent to the axle, but the wheel with the lowest friction sets the ultimate level to both wheels. Both wheels always get the same torque. What happens is that the wheel with the least resistance (the slipping wheel) sets the torque level to both wheels. So they both get power but it's extraordinarily low (and as a result the non-slipping wheel remains stationary because it doesn't have enough torque to propel the vehicle).
 
With no traction control intervention, a single slipping wheel will cause almost none of the torque to get to the ground. In that sense, it leaks out all of the torque. What does get to the other wheel is not enough to move the vehicle forward.
 
When traction control clamps down on the spinning wheel, it artificially raises the level of resistance on that axle which then allows an equivalent amount of torque to go to the other gripping wheel where it can bite and rotate.
 
Here's an explanation that's written far better than I could do:
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_%28mechanics%29#Loss_of_traction
 
Craig
#2607 of 2660
Re: SH-AWD, VDC [c_hunter] by paisan
Feb 18, 2007 (8:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: c_hunter (Feb 18, 2007 6:55 pm)

Thanks craig, never realized that at all. I guess on high HP/Torque vehicles like the Armada, there is plenty of extra torque to compensate. For offroading, the ABLS has really been great on my truck, on all my previous Mechanical LSDs, they wore out offroading by 70k miles with a $500-$700 rebuild whereas my brake pads run about $150. Also almost no trucks come with a front LSD or Locker from the factory so the ABLS on the front helps too.
 
-mike
#2608 of 2660
Re: SH-AWD, VDC [paisan] by c_hunter
Feb 19, 2007 (7:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: paisan (Feb 18, 2007 8:53 pm)

Yeah, I think the braked systems are quite good, in fact they are potentially better than a mechanical LSD, with some computer smarts. I have seen a demo of VDC on rollers, and the computer actually alternates braking among all the spinning wheels as it hunts for traction. Pretty cool. It's an intelligent way to move the power around, and the braking is quite brief -- so the power loss is a small tradeoff for more intelligent traction control. I have no doubt this is better than a LSD when multiple wheels are slipping.
 
Craig
#2609 of 2660
Re: ski trip [c_hunter] by kens
Feb 21, 2007 (10:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: c_hunter (Feb 17, 2007 9:25 am)

Craig,
 
Nice pics! The RDX looks fantastic. I've seen quite a few in my area and I like the looks -- a more taught balanced version of it's bigger sibling.
 
ken
#2610 of 2660
VIR Event by paisan
Feb 27, 2007 (9:38 pm)
Reply





 
The rest are here: http://www.pbase.com/paisan/vir0207&page=all

Messages Page 261 of 266
1
...
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
...
266
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement