You are here: Forums Pickups Chevrolet Silverado & GMC Sierra Chevy Silverado/GMC Sierra - Owners hangout 

Chevy Silverado/GMC Sierra - Owners hangout - READ ONLY

5688 messages,  Last post on Oct 17, 2006 at 8:34 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Silverado & GMC Sierra Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Silverado 1500, Chevrolet Silverado 2500, Chevrolet Silverado 3500, GMC Sierra 1500, GMC Sierra 2500, GMC Sierra 3500, Truck

#4931 of 5688 Re: aftermarket parts [obyone] by txyank1 May 17, 2005 (7:20 am)
Replying to: obyone (May 16, 2005 10:52 am) It was cheap, and even if there's no improvement it gets rid of the big bulky stock tube. A smooth straight tube is about the only part of a CAI that does help, short of actually getting cooler air in. Unlike the Tornado. It's not like I have great expectations for it. Replies to this message: obyone (May 17, 2005 11:07 am) txyank1 (May 18, 2005 3:44 am)
#4932 of 5688 Thanks for the advice, osubeav... by andre1969 May 17, 2005 (10:38 am)
the guy at the gravel place pretty much said the same thing. They didn't know how much it actually weighed, but they said that they wouldn't recommend doing with anything less than a 3/4 ton truck! Replies to this message: osubeav (May 17, 2005 12:27 pm)
#4933 of 5688 Re: aftermarket parts [txyank1] by obyone May 17, 2005 (11:07 am)
Replying to: txyank1 (May 17, 2005 7:20 am) What about resonance? any problems with that? I kind of experimented. The airaid had more resonance than the K&N FIPK. If you looked at both, the airaid has more restriction (bad design) compared to the K&N. And it used to howl at WOT. Not as much with the K&N. So I put the K&N in the Denali and the airaid in the rado. Couple of months ago I removed both and they now sit in the garage on the shelf waiting for me to get motivated enough to put them onsale at ebay.   BTW, both throttle bodies were trashed and black with gunk as I had checked and cleaned them when I removed them. Hadn't noticed any hp or mpg improvement with these expensive bolt ons. Replies to this message: txyank1 (May 18, 2005 3:44 am)
#4934 of 5688 Re: gas milage increases [ryanbab] by obyone May 17, 2005 (11:11 am)
Replying to: ryanbab (May 16, 2005 6:58 pm) Changing the cab air filter increased your mpg? Good luck on this one now....
#4935 of 5688 Re: Thanks for the advice, osubeav... [andre1969] by osubeav May 17, 2005 (12:27 pm)
Replying to: andre1969 (May 17, 2005 10:38 am) I don't think I would do it in a 3/4 ton, either. Do you have access to a heavy duty trailer? That's well within the towing capability of the Silverado.
#4936 of 5688 Re: MPG and Rear Axle Ratio [truck5] by delrick May 17, 2005 (3:31 pm)
Replying to: truck5 (Apr 25, 2005 9:30 am) 05 Sierra Crewcab, 5.3L, 3.73, 17.0mpg, 7000mi, all stop and go Replies to this message: kcram (May 17, 2005 5:00 pm)
#4937 of 5688 Re: MPG and Rear Axle Ratio [delrick] by kcram HOST May 17, 2005 (5:00 pm)
Replying to: delrick (May 17, 2005 3:31 pm) Be sure to post numbers like this in the MPG: Chevy Silverado Real World Numbers discussion.   kcram - Pickups Host
#4938 of 5688 Re: aftermarket parts [obyone] by txyank1 May 18, 2005 (3:44 am)
Replying to: obyone (May 17, 2005 11:07 am) I haven't put it on yet, and this will be the first time I've changed the tube. The Airaid I had on my '99 did indeed howl at WOT...which I liked. Sounded like a 4bbl in days of old. I agree they're all a waste of money if you're really looking for hp or mg gains. Kinda like the Flowmaster thing...sounds good, and that's all I'm after. Intakes looks cool and even if they don't improve they don't hurt. As long as you don't over-oil your filter. BTW, my last one has been sitting in the garage for 4-5 yrs. now. Took it off after about a yr to see if my mpg would improve. Don't remember but don't think it did. The new K&N 77 series looks nice and folks who have them say (as well as K&N claims) they do make a slightly better hp improvement. As I'm sure you know, there's a lot of debate about how much crap comes through a K&N filter.
#4939 of 5688 Dayton Timberline H/T by capitaltruck May 18, 2005 (6:19 pm)
I was reading Consumer Reports tire ratings, they had good things to say about the Dayton Timberline H/T. The tread looks like it would do well on pavement, which is the only place I drive my 04 Silverado 1500 2wd. The OEM Goodyear Wrangler ST's are total trash. How often do you see a tire these days with a traction rating of B That's how trashy these OEMs are. The only problem, as I'm sure many owners are aware, is that 235 75 16 is a very difficult tire to find. Fortunately, the Timberlines are available in this size. Also, though Consumer Reports rated the Hankook as being a decent tire, there is no way I am putting a Korean tire on my truck. I guess I'm still a little simple like that. Replies to this message: sebring95 (May 20, 2005 5:03 am) capitaltruck (May 23, 2005 5:42 pm)
#4940 of 5688 Re: Tire size for 01 Silverado 1500 2WD [country00] by texsun by z71bill May 19, 2005 (12:58 pm)
Your post a while back said "As to the Liberator, my Dad thought they were made by Michelin also, but they are made by BF Goodrich out of Ft Wayne, IN. There is a recall on a batch made in a two week period, to include BF Goodrich, Liberator and Uniroyal brands."   BF Goodrich sold the automotive tire business back in 1988, to a company by the name of MNA, INC.   NMA, INC also owns the Uniroyal brand.   That is why the recall of the Liberator also included the BF Goodrich and Uniroyal brands.   BTW - MNA stands for Michelin North America - Michelin owns MNA, INC - which owns the BF Goodrich and Uniroyal brands.   So your dad is right - Michelin does make the Liberator - Replies to this message: texsun (May 21, 2005 9:34 am) btenvy1 (May 21, 2005 12:53 pm)

You are here: Forums Pickups Chevrolet Silverado & GMC Sierra Chevy Silverado/GMC Sierra - Owners hangout