You are here: Forums Sedans Lincoln LS Lincoln LS

Lincoln LS

15392 messages,  Last post on Oct 23, 2009 at 5:20 PM

You are in the Lincoln LS Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Lincoln LS, Sedan

Messages Page 422 of 1540 1 ... 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 ... 1540 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#4208 of 15392 Acura 3.2? by stanny1 Aug 10, 2001 (10:42 am)
How could you buy a FWD instead of a Lincoln LS? In many comparison tests, It is the ONLY RWD you can buy without spending big bucks. The Infiniti G35 is the only competition on the horizon with RWD in this price range. After driving many FWD cars (and owning none), I can only say I've avoided the FWD lobotomy thus far (General Motors hasn't put a reward out on me yet). The 3.2 is an OK appliance until I try to drift the first corner. FWD cars always look funny when they end up pointing backwards on the freeway.
#4209 of 15392 windows by thomas_l Aug 10, 2001 (10:44 am)
The window failure is about the only thing that I haven't had to deal with knock on wud. 08/99 build had since 04/00 with just over 17k on it now. Hopefully the windows will be the next owner's problem not mine.
#4210 of 15392 Window Failures . . . by lolaj42 Aug 10, 2001 (11:19 am)
At least there's a fix for this problem, and Lincoln has accepted responsibility for the failure to begin with. I like the fact that if one window fails, Lincoln will replace BOTH rear window mechanisms gratis. While I may not have gotten the sweetest deal on my purchase price (long story), my dealer did give me 3-year deal for complete maintenance (same as what Lincoln provided for MY01). Either way, if a window fails before Jan. 03, it gets replaced on someone else's checkbook, and I'll know how to push my point.   lslincolnsucks - My friend Kevin (he accompanied me to Mania I in Irvine) has a '00 3.2 TL and would love to get rid of it in favor of an LS . . . he's just "stuck" in his current lease. Per Kevin, the TL has too many squeaks and rattles, and just doesn't feel tight enough for him.
#4211 of 15392 Smart Trac Questions by demkovich Aug 10, 2001 (11:36 am)
I would like to know how the rear wheel drive handles in the snow with the "Smart Trac" option. I know that traction control really doesn't help in winter weather but I'm told the Smart Trac is suppose to be Cats meow in winter. I would like to hear a actual LS owners opinion. Tahnks
#4212 of 15392 RWD & Other Valid Competitors (to stanny1, #4093) by giowa Aug 10, 2001 (12:18 pm)
Valid current and future competitors to LS8 and/or LS6 include: Catera, IS300, 325i, 330i, 525i, 530i, C240, C320, S80, S-type 3.0, GS300, and the G35, FWD/AWD A4, A6, and AWD Jag X-type.   Think the way to view it is sports sedan, not necessarily RWD sport sedan. Sure, we'd like to limit it to RWD, but there are some competitive FWD or AWD sport sedans. Their numbers are competitive. We'd likely argue they "feel different", but that doesn't mean they can be automatically discounted.
#4213 of 15392 The relevance of 0-60 acceleration times by slunar Aug 10, 2001 (12:34 pm)
The September issue of C&D has a luxo comparison (listed here in finishing order of 7 to 1) of the Cadillac DTS, Jag S-type 4.0, Mercedes E430, Infiniti Q45, Lexus GS430, Audi A6 4.2 Quattro & BMW 540i. Well what a surprise, BMW wins again. C&D's biggest complaint was the acceleration of the S-type. Although I usually am awed by every word I type (that's a joke friends) I couldn't have said it better. Here are C&D's words:   "Although it's unfair to judge any automobile outside the NHRA on nothing more than its straight-line acceleration, it can be an indication of overall responsiveness in passing situations, cornering and general road behavior. Here the Jaguar, although acceptable by most standards, lagged behind the best of this particular class and therefore fell in the final grading."   Sounds all too familiar to several LS reviews. I was surprised to see the 0-60 time for the S-type 4.0 at 6.3 seconds, which I think is the fastest time for it in any rag so far. Makes me wonder if the Jag has new PCM software too. The Jag is listed with a 3.31 rear end. Interestingly, both the HP of the S-type and the 540i are almost idendical 281 vs. 282) but the 540i has a lot more torque 324 lb-ft 3600 RPM vs. 287 lb-ft at 4300 RPM. Overall the 540i was the fastest car in the test wining 5 of the 7 different acceleration tests C&D runs.
#4214 of 15392 Giowa - re. Competitors . . . by lolaj42 Aug 10, 2001 (12:49 pm)
There's no way I'd compare ANY FWD platform to the LS. Period. Also, there's no way I'd compare the 3-series BMW, Audi A4, IS300, or Jag X-type to the LS . . . they're all much smaller in size. Just because they're priced similarly doesn't make them direct competitors. If you're comparing by price and 4-doors, then you might as well throw in an Acura MDX on you're shopping list! Also, using your logic, the BMW 5-series competes with the 3-series. Price points are more reflective of demographics than vehicle attributes, and each of the cars you mention are aimed at a similar demographic.   I don't want to start a flame throwing battle here, but this is an old, and tired discussion that's been rehashed for the bazillionth time. The regular contributors on this board pretty much know where we all stand on this point, so I'm not sure who you're trying to convince with your argument. I'm not saying that you're argument doesn't have merit, but it doesn't fully wash with me.   . . . donning the nomex, just in case
#4217 of 15392 LS Competition by fantom Aug 10, 2001 (1:25 pm)
I purchased a 2001 LS V6 at the beginning of the year with the Sport package, chrome wheels, a moonroof and the convenience package for $33,010 plus TTL, under the X-plan.   Other than it being slower than a baseball sized turd ball passing through my cats butt :<), as some on this list would have you believe, there was no competition, then or now, that offered the semi-luxury features the LS does. Who knows about next year. The LS was the best choice, at the time, for me. There was a HBR article a while back that contended that 60% of all decisions made could be proven wrong - given the benefit of 12 months foresight. Given my decision matrix, none of the cars mentioned in post #4097 (and I've driven most of them) came close to the LS at my moment of truth. My crystal ball is not as clear as some others' when it comes to my next moment of truth. BTW, does anyone know of a good laxative for my cat?

Messages Page 422 of 1540 1 ... 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 ... 1540 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Sedans Lincoln LS Lincoln LS