Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Toyota Sequoia Toyota Sequoia vs Chevy Suburban GMC Yukon XL
162 messages, Last post on Jun 23, 2006 at 4:50 PM
You are in the Toyota Sequoia Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
Chevy/GMC have the muscle in terms of towing capacity, but in terms of the 5000-6000 pound load, how does the Sequoia, rated at a 6200 pound capacity, handle it? OR, should someone not even REALLY think about towing this kind of load with a Sequoia and just go with the Chevy/GMC?
|
|
|
I am trying to get the most for my $$$. I have a family of 5 boys ( one of them I'm married to ) and we already have 2 trucks. The latest being a Chevy Silverado HD Duramax etc. I am currently in a KIA mini van and want to trade for an SUV. Have been looking at the SEQ but kind of pricey. Don't do any towing but do live in the mountains of Montana and boys in family do a lot of hunting so for me to go where they are I need a4x4. Husband tends to think trailblazers and such are to small, but I like the 6 cyl for the gas economy. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
Replying to: candiran (Feb 16, 2006 11:48 am) 2006 Tahoe is a brand new model with new exterior/interior styling; more engine configurations with a hybrid coming out soon. 2006 Tundra was just introduced at I believe the Chicago auto show so the "new" model Sequoia would be following not too long after the Tundra starts rolling off the assembly line. Of course, the Tundra/Sequoia is completely redesigned with a new engine as well. Toyota is talking about a hybrid for the Tundra/Sequoia. I guess the relevant question would be; what is your time frame for purchasing/leasing? Additionally, Toyota will have a higher resale value even though it is more "pricey." BTW, just for reference, I owned a Tahoe (2000) before buying an 04' Sequoia. Gotta love the power in the Chevy but after 60k miles and it starting to have problems I got rid of it quick and bought the Toyota. Got about 30k on the Toyo and so far it is flawless. Hope this helps. 
|
|
|
Replying to: mm1923 (Feb 13, 2005 12:39 pm)  In August of 2005 I traded a 2003 Suburban LT on a 2005 Toyota Sequoia Limited. BIG MISTAKE!!! I have been having many problems with the Sequoia and have had it back to the dealer twice. Now it will be going back a third time for problems not solved in the first two trips and all this in only 4,100 miles. My Burb only had 11,000 care free miles on it and I only had to take it back to the dealer for a recall on the second row seat belt. They fixed the problem in less than an hour and I was on my way. The #1 and only reason I went with the Sequoia was because of the so called Toyota Reliability Factor! I can assure you my Sequoia certainly does not live up to Toyota's so called RELIABILITY????. RELIABILITY???? give me a break!! The new 2007 Suburbans are coming to the dealers around April or May and I can tell you I WILL be going back to the SUBURBAN. My take on the Sequoia is that it is HIGHLY OVERRATED AND HIGHLY OVER PRICED. No wonder the Sequoia is said to have a higher trade in value. It's OVER PRICED to begin with. My 03 Burb had many,many, more bells and whistles for much less money($3000 less MSRP) than my Sequoia has. My advice is go for the all new 2007 Suburban as that is exactly what I am going to do. I have owned my first and last Toyota guaranteed! For me its Suburban all the way. After all the Suburban was the first and is the Granddaddy of all the SUVs, as we know them, today. Take notice as to what the U.S. Government is using....Suburbans!!
|
|
|
Replying to: ggesq (Feb 16, 2006 2:45 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: tdoh (Feb 23, 2006 4:32 pm)
|
|
| I tried the Expedition, Sequoia, Armada, Tahoe & Suburban. In truth, the Sienna had more passenger room than all but the Suburban. My wife and I have 4 boys, a girl and 115 yellow lab. The Suburban was the clear choice. It also makes me feel better knowing that my most presious cargo is in such a safe vehicle. | |
|
Replying to: tomk4 (Jan 11, 2006 11:24 pm) The key is to get a good hitch set up and dial in the trailer breaks (recommend cam anti-sway control and load equalizer bars). Temps were in the 90's pulling extended grades of 6% at altitude and never had the temp budge. I know alot of people will argue to NEVER exceed weight limits. I am very conservative and never felt overloaded, unsafe or white knuckled. I guess I don't necessarily buy into attorney and lawsuit driven national paranoia of guard rails everywhere and coffee labeled hot. |
|
|
Replying to: jsnoopy (Feb 22, 2006 12:51 pm) Having owned a Tahoe and now a Sequoia I thought you might be interested to know that according to Edmunds TMV pricing- 2007 Burb LT 1500 4WD w/ LTZ package & Navigation is $48,267. 2006 Sequoia Limited 4WD w/ Navi is $40,700. And you were saying? Almost 8K more and in a couple of years the Sequoia will still have a higher resale than the Chevy. Heck, it will most likely outlast it too. "Take notice as to what the U.S. Government is using....Suburbans!!" Yes, they are cheap and expendable. 
|
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs Toyota Sequoia Toyota Sequoia vs Chevy Suburban GMC Yukon XL
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Toyota Sequoia
2010 Chevrolet Suburban
2010 GMC Yukon XL
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
