You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Toyota Sequoia
Toyota Sequoia vs Chevy Suburban GMC Yukon XL

162 messages, Last post on Jun 23, 2006 at 4:50 PM
You are in the Toyota Sequoia Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Do you know of anyone that owns a GM vortec motor 99-2003 that has piston slap and oil consumption? Or are you just responding to one or two messages? And that is percieved higher quality... |
|
|
because I needed to carry 8 people, 4 adults and 3/5/9/12 year old kids, all with shoulder belts (one child safety seat in 3rd row middle with a tether) and luggage on vacation and have all that inside the vehicle. I also needed to stay as close to $30,000 as possible. We paid just under $32,000 for a new 2003 YXL last November using GM and dealer incentives. We did get cloth (my choice in any case), bucket front seats, Bose stereo, etc. So it is far from spartan. Try doing all that in a Sequoia. If your needs are different, your pockets deeper, your luck and/or shopping skills worse, or biases more entrenched then you may well choose differently. Enjoy what you drive. |
|
| Well, my unscientific observation seems to reveal that there are more NBS Suburbans than Sequoias out on the roads...and wasn't the Tahoe the best-selling full-sized SUV--in terms of units sold--last year or the year before? Surely the GM SUVs can't be all that bad if there are that many out there... | |
| You're right they are good trucks, if it wasn't for the 80's interior I would have bought one. However, they are not at the same level of quality as the Toyota. Not yet anyway. | |
| If there was any doubt about what the public likes and reliability issues that were independently put together just read the latest issue of Consumer Reports!! | |
|
"And if you must drive a titanic SUV, you really can't beat a Suburban for ease of use and passenger hauling." Sequoia Test Drive (Forbes) Steve, Host |
|
|
I've always had a hard time placing any credence in "lifestyle" magazines that can't even get the engine size correct. "And although the 4.6-liter V-8 is buttery, and shifts from the four-speed automatic are as clean as any in all of truckdom, the motor only knocks out 240hp and 315 ft.-lbs. of torque. " |
|
| And how about the picture of the DVD player? I don't know where that's from, but it's not a Sequoia. Maybe a Landcruiser. | |
| I noticed that too! I don't think it's a Land Cruiser either. | |
|
I have owned 3 Land Cruisers(95,97,02) which I purchased new and have had no regrets. I have owned 2 Suburban 2500 4wdr (99,2001)and also enjoyed owning them. Off road capability and build quality I would give the nod to the Toyotas. For highway driving,power(no comparison)towing and interior space I would go with the Suburbans. I am looking to buy a new SUV next month and I am considering the Seqouia,I am not to fond of the current Land Cruiser styling and the Seqouia is larger which I like. I will also be pricing a 2500 4 wheel drive Suburban. Tuff decissions. |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Toyota Sequoia
Toyota Sequoia vs Chevy Suburban GMC Yukon XL
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Toyota Sequoia
2010 Chevrolet Suburban
2010 GMC Yukon XL



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats