You are here: Forums SUVs Toyota Sequoia Toyota Sequoia vs Chevy Suburban GMC Yukon XL

Toyota Sequoia vs Chevy Suburban GMC Yukon XL

162 messages,  Last post on Jun 23, 2006 at 4:50 PM

You are in the Toyota Sequoia Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Toyota Sequoia, Chevrolet Suburban, GMC Yukon XL, SUV

Messages Page 2 of 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 17 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#2 of 162 which better by thirdsuv Jan 14, 2001 (12:43 pm)
This almost sounds like a Toyota rep pumping the forums, but I'll bite anyway.   Before our Expedition got totalled my wife was complaining that only a burb/yuck-xl would do for the next car. After the wreck we were just about ready to get a yuck-xl (down to choosing colors and such) when we caught a little newspaper blurb about SEQ. The usability and fit/finish of the SEQ is so good compared to GM that as long as the the demo car didn't blow a head gasket on the test drive we decided that we were probably going to buy it. If you are a family of 5-6 or less and you think you need a burb, you mostly will discover that the SEQ will meet 99.9% of your daily needs without the extra fat and troubles of the GM. If your family is 7 or bigger then you need a Burb and a box of Trojans or your next vehicle will only be available in the color orange and seat 50   cheers
#3 of 162 rear cargo space by gpm5 Jan 30, 2001 (2:56 pm)
I looked at both yesterday. Supposedly the Sequoia is as large as the Suburban, but the rear cargo space behind the 3rd row is virtually non-existent in the Sequoia. I don't think you could get a couple of large suitcases back there. Even less than my Windstar van. But the cargo space is huge behind the 3rd seat on the suburban. I looked at both an SR5 and a limited. Neither has enough cargo space for me, unless it comes in an extended version.
#4 of 162 Cargo space by rruck1 Jan 31, 2001 (1:19 pm)
The Suburban and Sequoia are not the same size. The Sequoia is roughly the same size as an Expedition. I purchased one just before Christmas and have been very happy with the amount of room. I would not have considered a Suburban though, because I just don't need that much room. I also would not have purchased any GM product due to a bad experience with my 1994 Jimmy. Toyota reputation for quality is what finally pushed me into the full size SUV market, I had been looking for the past couple of years, but didn't want to shell out the dough for a Ford or GM. I love the Sequoia.
#5 of 162 sequoia needs extended?? by gpm5 Feb 01, 2001 (6:58 am)
Too bad they don't make an extended version of that truck.
#6 of 162 Seq edging out Suburban/X5 by vasyl Feb 01, 2001 (9:29 am)
It was down to the Sep, Suburban, or BMW X5. I drove the X5 and was impressed with the ride and especially the safety features- but even with only 2 children I think it is too small. When mom shows up or an extra kid or 2 to the beach we're undersized.    Last week I went the auto show and must have jumped in and out of every SUV a dozen times. I especially was comparing the Seq to the Burb. I was more impressed with the Seq. The third row seat was adequate for adults and I liked the access via the "tumbling" 2nd row seat. Fit and finish was typical Toyota although the Ltd interior console in metal trim was not very pleasing. Cargo room behind the 3rd row was of course much smaller than the Burb. But realistically for a family of 4 or 5 the Seq seems to make more sense. In a pinch I always carry a few bunjee cords and can put a suitcase or something on the roof rack. But for most driving, being a couple feet shorter is more convenient in our garage as well as parking.    We have a Jeep Grand Cherokee which is a total piece of junk. Since we will keep this vehicle for at least 7 years or more we have put a lot more emphasis on realiability. The Suburban we felt had to have the extended warranty to compete with the Toyota and even then, the inconvenience of having to go to the dealer and be without a ride for even 1 day is a factor.   I was concerned that the Seq. did not have enough power for it's weight. Even though the Burb had about 40 more horsepower, the Seq actually had more torque. 315 lb-ft vs. the Burb's 290 (I may be corrected on the Seq but it is still more than the Burb) and it is torque that will make this vehicle feel good accelerating under normal and semi aggresive driving. Plus the Seq has several hundred pounds less weight to carry around.   Of course the Toyota dealer I visited here told me they were getting "over" invoice (about 2 months ago ) so I said "SEE YA!" So like everyone else we have a budget (mid 30's) and finally it will depend on the selling price. If anyone has any Houston area experience , would like to hear.
#7 of 162 vasyl by msu79gt82 Feb 01, 2001 (9:52 am)
I too would select the SQ over the Sub. However, SQs are not perfect and you can't count on it never being in the shop for "even 1 day." If being "without a ride for even 1 day is a factor" (your quote) I would be at a loss to even come up with a vehicle so perfect. Of course the SQ probably will have a better reliabilty record than the Subs, but it is a first year model.   I live in Katy and have not seen any significant discounting of SQs yet. Have you considered an Acura MDX? It should be plenty adequate for a family of four. Of course there are no discounts on it either, but a fully loaded SQ 4WD Ltd (with dealer/port ad-ons) MSRPs at close to $43,000. One such add-on in the Houston area is the $795 window etching!! Acura does not do this, and in fact a fully loaded MDX w/ Navigation MSRPs at $39,450.
#8 of 162 seq/burb by eagle63 Feb 01, 2001 (10:29 am)
I think I'd choose the burb just for the looks factor alone! (IMO, the sequoia got hit one too many times with the ugly stick!) Toyota makes top-notch vehicles, but I wish they'd work on the appearance a bit.
#9 of 162 We Went For Sequoia by firsttimesuv Feb 01, 2001 (4:00 pm)
We researched this one for almost four months, focusing primarily on the Sequoia/Suburban debate. Ultimately, went with the Toyota, coming out of a Chrysler mini van (into which we'd put a transmission after 40,000 miles - - a wholly separate story). The big factors in our choice were: (i) Reputed Toyota build-quality, as compared to known reliability issues with every Suburban any of our friends have ever owned - - admittedly a gamble with a new model, but we needed to buy something, and the Suburban was a known evil; (ii) eight passenger three-point seat belts, side air curtains, more sophisticated four-wheel drive and traction control, and better braking systems in the Sequoia all meant higher marks for safety in this kid die carrier for a mom in the suburbs; (iii) the ride in the Toyota impressed us hugely; more nimble than the Suburban in most conditions that we need; (iv) it was from a style standpoint a little different in an area (Washington, DC suburbs) chock full of Suburbans, and a fully dressed SR5 had everything we wanted at a slightly lower price than the Suburban LT. After about a month, the kids (4, 6 and 11) are happy and the wife is ecstatic. Worked for me. Pricing was $1850 under MSRP for the fully-dressed SR5, with $2500 in after-markets (Audio-Vox DVD player and some other goodies) thrown in at dealer cost. I had to sweat to get to that level.   Toyota is bound to add fog lights for the SR5 next year, but until then, you have to order them as parts and then have them installed elsewhere.
#10 of 162 Go with the Sequoia by ravvie4me Feb 01, 2001 (4:06 pm)
Why? Because:   1) It's a Toyota. Which means it's reliable, durable, and built of the highest quality materials for the interior and exterior. Fit and finish are also superior.   2) It's got the same engine used in the Land Cruiser and Tundra (i-force V8), which is Lexus-derived!   3) Typical Toyota resale value (very high)   4) The Toyota will barely be broken in after all of the domestics hit the scrap heaps. Plus you won't be paying out the a$$ for repairs after the warranty expires like you would with the American brands, 'nuff said.   I'm sure there are more reasons, but I'll leave it at this for now!
#11 of 162 rawie4me by eagle63 Feb 01, 2001 (6:24 pm)
responding to your point #4: are you really going to keep this vehicle for more the 3 or 4 years? be honest. also, what you won't have to pay in repair bills later, you already paid up front in a high sticker price.

Messages Page 2 of 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 17 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums SUVs Toyota Sequoia Toyota Sequoia vs Chevy Suburban GMC Yukon XL