Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Hatchbacks Ford Focus Ford Focus Sedan
1997 messages, Last post on Aug 02, 2009 at 5:57 PM
You are in the Ford Focus Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
Please refrain from making comments based on biased fiction instead of Facts. The 2.0L in the Focus has a combined EPA of 28 mpg. The 1.8L in the Civic has a combined EPA of 29 mpg. Hardly much of a difference when you consider that the Focus has a 4 speed auto vs the 5 speed auto in the Civic. Focus has a bigger engine (more torque) and has 2 cubic feet more in the passanger compartment and in the truck. www.fueleconomy.gov  Mark
|
|
|
Replying to: mschmal (Nov 06, 2007 2:34 pm) Consumer Reports' real-world testing has been consistently complaining about Focus' low mpg, even after switching to Mazda-ized engines. While these Mazda-ized engines used in the Focus are tuned to have stronger low-end torque & weaker high-end hp than the ones used in the Mazda3, CR's real-world testing praised the 2.0 Mazda3 for having the best mpg! My torquiest Focus engine -- the ST 2.3 -- feels weaker than my '98 Corolla 1.8 at low rpm. I get 40mpg cruising my 5-sp Corolla LE on the fwy, while my 5-sp Focus ST can't even come close. Despite all that, I still hated my Corolla due to the poor steering, handling, ride & driving position. That's why I got rid of it & bought the Focus ST. How many people in (the "badge snob") S. California do that? 
|
|
|
I really wish Ford would dump 4 speed autos. It doesn't hurt so much in the Focus as in other vehicles. The new 08 Escape actually gets lower MPG than the bigger Edge! I know Ford is retooling a plant in Mich to make more 6F trans and they already have excess 3.5L capacity so that is coming to the Escape. But by then the competition will have moved on also. FORD LETS GET THE STUFF TO MARKET! Mark
|
|
|
Replying to: mschmal (Nov 07, 2007 4:37 am) http://newsletter.autoexpress.co.uk/c/11YilAnl46M46Jh Ford thinks that Focus buyers in America are bunch of cheapskates that don't deserve the best transmission. So only people overseas get it. But heck, I don't care 'cause I drive stick. "Following in the footsteps of the hatchback range, this is the first picture of the new Focus saloon (below left). Getting the same Mondeo-style looks as the three and five-door cars, the booted car features a revised tail with a fresh bumper and LED lights. Unlike the hatches, it will only be available with 1.6, 1.8 and 2.0-litre diesel engines, as well as 1.6 and 2.0 petrols." http://newsletter.autoexpress.co.uk/c/11YilAnl46M46Jh Click the lower right picture to see the sedan. I still think my 2.3 "classic" Focus ST rules, in terms of looks, normally aspirated power & handling fun! http://www.gulfcoastnews.com/RT2005FordFocus.htm Having the old Mondeo nose http://www.wheels24.co.za/Wheels24/Galleries/w24_GalleriesModelPicDisplay/0,,675- - - - -13649,00.html looks more cool than having the new Mondeo nose, IMO. http://carscoop.blogspot.com/2007/02/geneva-preview-2008-ford-mondeo-full.html |
|
|
|
The Firestone mechanic who tried to correct premature rear tire wear said that he can not adjust the rear camber because Ford didn't create a way. I like this car otherwise, but the ride is killing me. Are there any reasonable solutions?
|
|
|
It continues to surprise me how many people never learned to rotate their tires. I suspect though that you might have something else going on. Usually its the front tires that take the beating, especially on a front drive car. Incidently, the Focus and the Civic have a 4 wheel independant suspension. the Corolla and the Sentra/Versa do not have independant rear suspension. You want a better ride, you need to get a car with a longer wheel base. Mark. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: jacksoncat (Dec 01, 2007 5:06 pm) Proper tire rotation is essential as well, but that will not effect the ride. Also, you can buy a camber kit so as to be able to adjust the rear camber, but that will not effect ride either. One of the reason I love the Focus is the supple ride combined with great handling. |
|
|
Just bought a 2007 SE. Great deal with all the rebates. So far about 400 miles on the car. It is not quite what I am used to, but a fun car to drive. I hope it lasts like my last Ford. 2007 Focus Sedan SE package Safety package Moon roof cruise tilt etc... Already at 34 MPG.....only first tank of gas....
|
|
|
Replying to: mschmal (Dec 03, 2007 4:46 am) 
|
|
|
|
|
There is something wrong with your alignment if you are cupping tires. Having a light rear end has nothing to do with it. I've got 15,000 miles on my tires and neglected the rotation until 14,000. The backs looked like new, no cupping at all. Keep in mind that factory alignments are pretty rough, and even the "factory specs" are fairly loose. I always find a good shop who is willing to get them tightly in the middle. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks Ford Focus Ford Focus Sedan
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Ford Focus
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
