Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Hatchbacks Ford Focus Ford Focus Sedan
1997 messages, Last post on Aug 02, 2009 at 5:57 PM
You are in the Ford Focus Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
Replying to: waynebengston (Jul 15, 2007 4:28 am) The base RX-8 auto felt like a light-weight car eventhough it isn't, as I could not reach the tire-adhesion limit during the test drive. Actually, one reason I picked the Focus ST over the RX-8 was b/c the RX-8 was too good! A car is no fun if I won't be able to reach the limit on the street, despite that the RX-8 rides smoother than the Focus ST & the steering, while only electric powered, was confident-inspiring enough. So such competent platform can afford to waste a little bit like increasing the engine weight/volume from a rotary to a 4-cyl for a much meatier low-end torque, plus raising the center of gravity w/ a taller roof & seat height for more room & comfort. That way, I can even reach the limit on street driving. In the old days, people think that only the cramped Scirocco can handle, but the taller-roof Rabbit GTI does pretty much the same. |
|
|
|
|
I gave serious consideration to the RX-8, but simply could not get past the fuel economy. I had no problems pushing it to its limits, and it really reminded me of the NC Miata, which makes sense. I know that the chassis would do fine under a traditional sedan. It would certainly give up some sharpness, but it would still be a cut above anything in its class.
|
|
|
Replying to: waynebengston (Jul 15, 2007 7:43 am) Investing another $20k or more can make an RX-8 a frugal car that can also do jack-rabbit start while not making its light nose any heavier. RX-8's high CO2 level can be eliminated, too, while each dollar of energy can run almost 100 miles. It's called electrification w/ lithium batteries & a silent reliable electric motor w/ max torque available from 0 rpm. You can leave your manual transmission in gear even at dead stop. So stop-&-go traffic becomes even more effortless than driving an auto! There are at least a couple places in S California that do electric conversions. But making the car even heavier is inevitable. I'm looking forward to do my light-weight MkI '84 Wolfsburg Jetta coupe sometime in the future. |
|
i like mine a lot...a very good car and inexpensive...shoved a dryer in back amazingly enough...very roomy...that euro focus looks better though
|
|
|
Replying to: chetj (Jul 15, 2007 8:25 am) At least for the sedan version, I think the MkII is more bland. I prefer our '05-07 MkI ST sedan w/ Mondeo's nose: creakid1, "2008 Ford Focus future vehicle" #70, 4 Jul 2007 9:10 pm |
|
|
Drove from 60110 to Orlando I got a wopping 35 mpg round trip using cruise control 65 all the way there and back. Now orlando in town driving I only got 25 mpg Still a huge saveings over my traded in SUV!!! Has anyone have inside info on the 2009 Chevy Volt 100 mpg? |
|
|
I have a new 2007 SES. I like it:). Question though, any tricks or gotcha's on mounting the front license plate? I see the marks for the fasteners, but what kind of fastener should I use. I did not get anything with the car. Thanks in advance.....
|
|
|
Replying to: bob_in_br (Jul 29, 2007 10:51 am) |
|
|
look in your glove box the screws should be in there. I got the 2007 SES with weather package and moon roof! I am going to replace the factory radio, speakers, i will also add 2 amps and 1 sub woofer. I plan on keeping this car for the next 5 years so i do not mind upgrading the tunes. |
|
|
|
|
My 2005 Focus ST with the 2.3 liter and 5-speed manual transmission is still running flawlessly at 47,000 miles. Observations? It is still a joy to drive with perfect on-center feel and tracking (lacking in so much of the competition). The Focus goes where it is pointed with a sense of purpose and control. It exits a curve with wonderful torque and power. There is a lot of road noise, addressed by the new 2008's attention to NVH but at the sacrifice of the lovely 2.3 liter engine as the '08 Focus only offers the 2.0 liter. Fuel economy for the sport model is just over 30 mpg all-in for the last 30,000 miles, with probably 70% Interstate (65-75 mph) and the rest mixed city. The manual is well located and both the shift throws and clutch feel work well for me. It could use another and higher sixth gear (beyond the 5 now available) to reduce cruising RPMs at 70 mph, but the ratios at lower speeds are sweet in cut and thrust driving. I've performed regular maintenance and used synthetic oil. The only unscheduled maintenance was replacement of a remote trunk release under warranty. (It relocked before you could open the trunk.) Very minor gripe is the wear on the radio buttons as it is the only thing that betrays it is not brand new. For the price, the economy, reliability and fun factor are hard to beat. Dressed in all black inside and out with a leather accented interior featuring red stitching my Focus looks purposeful and sporting. Based on my sterling experience, I heartily recommend the Focus as a well-sorted, reliable car.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks Ford Focus Ford Focus Sedan
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Ford Focus
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
