You are here: Forums Hatchbacks Ford Focus Ford Focus Sedan

Ford Focus Sedan

1997 messages,  Last post on Aug 02, 2009 at 5:57 PM

You are in the Ford Focus Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Ford Focus, Sedan

Messages Page 194 of 200 1 ... 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 ... 200 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#1927 of 1997 Cortina by waynebengston Jul 15, 2007 (4:28 am)
"I really think Ford should quickly create the rebirth of the Cortina compact RWD sedan by using the RX-8 platform w/ 2.3 4-cyl."   That's actually a great idea, and a car I'd buy in a heartbeat.   Here is what I like most about RWD; 1. Zero torque steer 2. Ability to add power in corner without reducing traction in front. 3. Ability to enter 4-wheel drift(not the lurid power slide people call drifting) with power on, rather than braking. 4. Better weight transfer on acceleration.   I know that FWD and RWD can both be driven quickly, and I know how to drive both quickly, but I get more satisfaction out of driving a RWD car quickly. Replies to this message: creakid1 (Jul 15, 2007 6:34 am)
#1928 of 1997 Re: Cortina [waynebengston] by creakid1 Jul 15, 2007 (6:34 am)
Replying to: waynebengston (Jul 15, 2007 4:28 am) Since only non-FWD (RWD & AWD) platforms can allocate the weight distribution aft of the front axle w/o losing the accelerating traction especially on uphills, the light-nose base RX-8 auto I test drove, w/ just 16"s & soft-riding suspension, was still exceptionally nimble. Auto Motor und Sport TV described the RX-8 as "unbelievably comfortable ride" when comparing it to the E46 330ci.   The base RX-8 auto felt like a light-weight car eventhough it isn't, as I could not reach the tire-adhesion limit during the test drive. Actually, one reason I picked the Focus ST over the RX-8 was b/c the RX-8 was too good! A car is no fun if I won't be able to reach the limit on the street, despite that the RX-8 rides smoother than the Focus ST & the steering, while only electric powered, was confident-inspiring enough.   So such competent platform can afford to waste a little bit like increasing the engine weight/volume from a rotary to a 4-cyl for a much meatier low-end torque, plus raising the center of gravity w/ a taller roof & seat height for more room & comfort. That way, I can even reach the limit on street driving.   In the old days, people think that only the cramped Scirocco can handle, but the taller-roof Rabbit GTI does pretty much the same.
#1929 of 1997 RX-8 by waynebengston Jul 15, 2007 (7:43 am)
I gave serious consideration to the RX-8, but simply could not get past the fuel economy.   I had no problems pushing it to its limits, and it really reminded me of the NC Miata, which makes sense. I know that the chassis would do fine under a traditional sedan. It would certainly give up some sharpness, but it would still be a cut above anything in its class. Replies to this message: creakid1 (Jul 15, 2007 8:24 am)
#1930 of 1997 Re: RX-8 [waynebengston] by creakid1 Jul 15, 2007 (8:24 am)
Replying to: waynebengston (Jul 15, 2007 7:43 am) "I gave serious consideration to the RX-8, but simply could not get past the fuel economy."   Investing another $20k or more can make an RX-8 a frugal car that can also do jack-rabbit start while not making its light nose any heavier. RX-8's high CO2 level can be eliminated, too, while each dollar of energy can run almost 100 miles.   It's called electrification w/ lithium batteries & a silent reliable electric motor w/ max torque available from 0 rpm. You can leave your manual transmission in gear even at dead stop. So stop-&-go traffic becomes even more effortless than driving an auto!   There are at least a couple places in S California that do electric conversions. But making the car even heavier is inevitable. I'm looking forward to do my light-weight MkI '84 Wolfsburg Jetta coupe sometime in the future.
#1931 of 1997 07 focus by chetj Jul 15, 2007 (8:25 am)
i like mine a lot...a very good car and inexpensive...shoved a dryer in back amazingly enough...very roomy...that euro focus looks better though Replies to this message: creakid1 (Jul 15, 2007 8:02 pm)
#1932 of 1997 Re: 07 focus [chetj] by creakid1 Jul 15, 2007 (8:02 pm)
Replying to: chetj (Jul 15, 2007 8:25 am) "...that euro focus looks better though"   At least for the sedan version, I think the MkII is more bland. I prefer our '05-07 MkI ST sedan w/ Mondeo's nose:   creakid1, "2008 Ford Focus future vehicle" #70, 4 Jul 2007 9:10 pm
#1933 of 1997 I went to Orlando WOW it was a mpg deal!!! by dj2big Jul 24, 2007 (7:25 pm)
Drove from 60110 to Orlando I got a wopping 35 mpg round trip using cruise control 65 all the way there and back.   Now orlando in town driving I only got 25 mpg   Still a huge saveings over my traded in SUV!!!   Has anyone have inside info on the 2009 Chevy Volt 100 mpg?
#1934 of 1997 Front License Plate by bob_in_br Jul 29, 2007 (10:51 am)
I have a new 2007 SES. I like it:). Question though, any tricks or gotcha's on mounting the front license plate? I see the marks for the fasteners, but what kind of fastener should I use. I did not get anything with the car.   Thanks in advance..... Replies to this message: bdyment (Jul 30, 2007 3:43 am)
#1935 of 1997 Re: Front License Plate [bob_in_br] by bdyment Jul 30, 2007 (3:43 am)
Replying to: bob_in_br (Jul 29, 2007 10:51 am) Your dealer should have provided you with a front mounting bracket and fasteners. Have them install the bracket.
#1936 of 1997 plate fastners by dj2big Aug 01, 2007 (8:46 pm)
look in your glove box the screws should be in there.   I got the 2007 SES with weather package and moon roof!   I am going to replace the factory radio, speakers, i will also add 2 amps and 1 sub woofer.   I plan on keeping this car for the next 5 years so i do not mind upgrading the tunes.

Messages Page 194 of 200 1 ... 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 ... 200 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Hatchbacks Ford Focus Ford Focus Sedan