BMW 3-Series 2005 and earlier

30250 messages,  Last post on Mar 24, 2013 at 11:51 AM

You are in the BMW 3-Series Forum.

What is this discussion about? BMW 3 Series, Sedan

#21991 of 30250 HP Differences: See December 2000 Car & Driver by riez

Feb 21, 2003 (8:04 am)

Check out the December 2000 Car & Driver, their test of new 330i. Excerpt:
 
"BMW says the added cubes only account for about 30 percent of the power spike over the 2.8-liter engine, which made 193 hp and 206 pound-feet, compared with the 330i's 225 hp and 214 pound-feet. ANOTHER 57 PERCENT COMES FROM FIDDLING WITH THE PROFILES OF THE TWIN-CHAMBER INTAKE-MANIFOLD AND EXHAUST PORTS, AND THE REST COMES FROM CHANGES IN THE CAM PROFILES. Happiness through better breathing, in other words. THANKS TO THE INTAKE FINAGLES SHARED WITH THE 3.0-LITER, THE BASE 2.5-LITER SIX ALSO GETS A 14-HP JOLT TO 184 HP."
 
Article also has a nice discussion about the changes to the M54 engine over time, including VANOS/double VANOS.
 
The MY 2000 full-color brochure for the 3 Series sedan says "Double VANOS steplessly variable valve timing" is standard with BOTH 323i (170 hp at 5500 RPMs and 181 pound-feet at 3500 RPMs) and 328i (193 hp at 5500 RPMs and 206 pound-feet at 3500 RPMs). And in the Technical Guide section of the brochure, it has a section devoted to explaining double VANOS.
 
The MY 2001 full-color brochure then shows output as 184 hp (6000 RPMs) and 175 pound-feet (3500 RPMs) for 2.5L and 225 hp (5900 RPMs) and 214 pound-feet (3500 RPMs) for 3.0L.
 
You have to keep in mind that the later 2.5L engine actually lost 6-pound-feet of torque from 2000 to 2001 and today. And notice how the higher hp figures come at higher RPMs compared to MY 2000.

#21992 of 30250 Hair splitting time... by shipo

Feb 21, 2003 (8:09 am)

The 1999 and 2000 323i have the following ratings:
 
HP: 1705500 RPMs
TQ: 1813500 RPMs
WT: 3153 Lbs
 
The 2001 and on 325i have the following ratings:
 
HP: 1846000 RPMs
TQ: 1753500 RPMs
WT: 3241 Lbs
 
In theory, the 323i should actually be a little faster off the line, and the 325i should be a little faster at higher speeds. If I remember correctly, Brave1Heart posted something a year ago or so that supported this theory, however, I cannot remember the specifics of his post.
 
Best Regards,
Shipo

#21993 of 30250 Riez by shipo

Feb 21, 2003 (8:12 am)

I see that great minds think along similar patterns, again. You and I must have been working on the two above posts at the same time.
 
Best Regards,
Shipo

#21994 of 30250 323 & 325 (e46) by jb_shin

Feb 21, 2003 (8:17 am)

Interesting torque rating for both engines:
 
323: 1813500
325: 1753500
 
and both engines have the same bore/stroke, compression ratio, and displacement. The only difference is the engine management system. The new system actually makes less torque, although it makes more bhp.

#21995 of 30250 Used 3-series market in Calif? by vkwheels

Feb 21, 2003 (10:20 am)

Would it be too weird (or risky) to plan a vacation to the West Coast, buy your car here, and then drive it home? just throwing the idea out there.

#21996 of 30250 by fjk57702

Feb 21, 2003 (10:23 am)

Looking at the bmw web site one can find for the 2.5 liter 6:
1995 - 189 hp5900 -> 168 ft-lbs 5900
1998 - 168 hp5500 -> 160 ft-lbs 5500
1999 - 170 hp5500 -> 162 ft-lbs 5000
2001 - 184 hp6000 -> 161 ft-lbs 6000
 
We can furthur compute that at 6000 RPMs the torque is less than:
1995 - 165 ft-lbs
1998 - 147 ft-lbs
1999 - 149 ft-lbs
2001 - 162 ft-lbs
 
So I think the 2001 engine has more torque at low and high speeds than the 99-2000 engines. I suspect that the 95 engine was not good below 2000 RPMs. But others on this forum can speak to that.

#21997 of 30250 by locke2c

Feb 21, 2003 (12:21 pm)

From 92-95 there was no 328, so of course the 2.5L made more power. When the 328 arrived, note the immediate and substantial loss of output.
 
-Colin

#21998 of 30250 by pheonixuno

Feb 21, 2003 (2:35 pm)

Very interesting stuff is there a web page with all the differences that happened from 97 on. I really have to check with my insurance for the M3. I pay 140 for 4 months and then I get 2 off but that is for my 96 civic. It really is interesting to read all the differences between the cars.

#21999 of 30250 by fjk57702

Feb 21, 2003 (2:45 pm)

http://www.bmwusa.com/
select certified preowned and then model library

#22000 of 30250 MY2000 Data--Torque by riez

Feb 21, 2003 (3:32 pm)

fjk... Why didn't you include the MY 2000 torque and hp data? (Methinks some of your numbers are off. The 2.5L torque data for 1999 and 2001 seems too low.)
To POST a message, please Sign In.

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement