You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Jaguar S-Type
Jaguar S-Type

1027 messages, Last post on Sep 09, 2009 at 9:18 PM
You are in the Jaguar S-Type Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: rayainsw (Aug 03, 2005 10:05 am) Don't know your age but in the late 70's early 80's there were conversion kits for a chevy small block into the jags. Many were done here in NJ. Was a trip to hear 350 horses of fresh SB in a Jag--ran like the dickens too!!!!!!!! and almost maintenance free. |
|
|
I'm new to this forum. I own a 2002 Trailblazer with over 160,000 on it and the TB forum here has been most helpfull. Truck runs well still..... knock on wood! I'm possibly looking to by a used S-Type in the 2002-2005 year range. Is there any thing that should worry me about doing so--as in inhert problems that continue to repeat? I understand that you can luck out and have no problems or get a lemon right from the start--been there already. But , I never owned a Jag before. Bunch of Toyos and Chevys and a couple of nissans. Any kind word would be extremely helpfull. Thanks. |
|
Back in July, I posted a message asking whether or not anyone had put 150,000 miles or so, on a Jaguar S type. Given the many responses as to the problems most people seem to be having, and no one having put 150,000 trouble-free miles on the "S",I must conclude that it is nothing but a "piece of junk" -- over-priced, and under-engineered. It is a "money-pit" that I'll avoid.
|
|
|
Replying to: wshfl (Aug 19, 2006 4:33 pm) It is not car for driving 150,000 miles. If you can afford to buy one, you should be able to afford to dump it a 50,000 miles or earlier and get another new car at that time. |
|
|
Plus, the car has just been out for just four years. You;d have to drive an awful lot to put 150K miles on on that time. 150,000 trouble-free miles is a pretty tall order. That didn't happen on my old toyota, nor on hondas, toyotas, lexuses, and subarus friends of mine have. |
|
|
That's true; 150,000 miles is a lot to put on in 4-6 years.It's just that it seems that most people who comment have a litany of consistent niggling problems, punctuated by catastrophic failures of transmissions, engines, etc. Then, posting #908 states that a Jag should not be expected to go 150,000 miles. To me, any car that can't be relied upon to travel that distance, should not be on the market. It's not a matter of affordability; it's a question of manufacturing integrity, and honest value for the money.
|
|
|
Replying to: wshfl (Aug 22, 2006 9:38 am) 150K miles is really a tough metric--in general you're talking about a very old car. My bmw has 120K miles and has been great. I do recall hearing about a 150K+ XJ8 from a friend. The owner owned businesses in several states and visited them every week. There are several such jags on autotrader..
|
|
|
Replying to: dhanley (Aug 22, 2006 6:05 pm) The repair and maintenance is so expensive that it makes no sense to do that. Who wants to drive a raggedly, rattling 100K mile plus S-Type with worn seats and cracked leather anyway? What is the point of that? Just dump the car at 36-50K miles and move on to the next car before it starts falling apart. If you want to drive high mileage, get a Corolla or Civic that might hold up for 250K miles and you can replace the engine and transmissions when they finally die for 1/3 or less of the cost of Jaguar parts if you are inclined to take the car even further. |
|
|
Why, exactly, do people buy Jag S Types, when every comparative test with similar BMW's, Audis, M.B.'s rate it as lagging behind the competition in almost every field: handling, perfomance, build quality, and resale value? Not only that, post #912 points out that by 100,000 miles, the car is apt to be raggety, and rattling, with seats that are cracked and falling apart.Inferior, even to Toyotas and Hondas. What are buyers getting for their money? The "Leaper"?
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Jaguar S-Type
Jaguar S-Type
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2008 Jaguar S-Type



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats