Sign In Join 



Acura RL

7335 messages,  Last post on Nov 26, 2009 at 12:31 PM

You are in the Acura RL Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Acura RL, Sedan


Messages Page 663 of 734
1
...
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
...
734
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#6620 of 7335
Re: Lakeshore Silver and ebony or taupe interior [jjacura] by spinningwheels
Aug 09, 2005 (1:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jjacura (Aug 08, 2005 2:05 pm)

Thank you, jjacura and formula, for your help.
 
Formula, you may have a point about the taupe being more popular since we don't see any of it. Black interiors seem to be plentiful.
#6621 of 7335
Re: CR Comparo [jjacura] by bartalk3
Aug 09, 2005 (8:41 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jjacura (Aug 06, 2005 5:57 pm)

jjacura: Yes, I was serious about an RL V-8 coming several years down the road. Saw it in a note in the current issue of Motor Trend. Also, in the current issue of Automotive News, a Honda official strongly suggests that they may be working on a V-8.
#6622 of 7335
Re: Acura RL Turning radius 3 feet wider than the others? [birdbird] by msu79gt82
Aug 10, 2005 (5:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: birdbird (Aug 09, 2005 1:27 pm)

I also thought it was strange that they placed the Acura TL in the same test category as the RL?
 
CR did not test the TL with the same group of AWD cars that included the RL. CR recently changed the way they score cars; there is now a standard measure that allows for comparisons to other tests. The recent comparo was AWD Luxury Sedans (RL, M35, A6, GS300, and STS). However because of the standardized scoring the final list could include other luxury cars tested earlier (e.g. BMW, LS430, and the TL).
 
BTW, I really disliked the turning radius in my old '02 TL-S. Not sure I can live with the RL's either
#6623 of 7335
Re: CR Comparo [bartalk3] by jjacura
Aug 10, 2005 (6:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: bartalk3 (Aug 09, 2005 8:41 pm)

Yes Bartalk, I heard from our good friend Acuraphile and he confirmed it as well, an aluminum 4.2 litre V-8. I'm a little backlogged on the car mags...we are having a busy summer. Daughter is up visiting from Houston with "The Girls" and we are having a blast...State Fair, Custard Stands, Pizza parlors...etc...will need to go on a diet soon!
 
The low beam headlights. A few of us have mentioned that there should be some kind of adjustment made because it seems that they are not focusing enough light and wondering what can be done about it. Anyone have the low beams adjusted yet? The brights are fine.
#6624 of 7335
Re: CR Comparo [jjacura] by sgl1
Aug 10, 2005 (10:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: jjacura (Aug 10, 2005 6:45 am)

"The low beam headlights. A few of us have mentioned that there should be some kind of adjustment made because it seems that they are not focusing enough light and wondering what can be done about it."
 
I actually adjusted mine myself. It was very easy. Under the hood there's a screwdriver hole in the plastic housing just above the headlight unit. It shows which way to turn the screwdriver for up or down. There is a rubber gasket in the hole, so a large shank screwdriver will fit snug enough into the hole to turn the dial. It took about 10 twists and now my low-beam xenons are terrific (without blinding on-coming traffic)! A must for all new RL owners. .
#6625 of 7335
Re: CR [msu79gt82] by satire
Aug 10, 2005 (2:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: msu79gt82 (Aug 04, 2005 11:16 am)

"What a joke This line of BS is pure satire right?"
 
If anything, I'd probably say my comments were sarcastic. But my intent was to make a point and apparently I did. However, do you feel that this forum is an appropriate place to be insulting? "Deluded"???
 
As I said, for what it's worth, Consumer Reports will play no role in any decision I make regarding a new car. I continue to encourage everyone to seek other opinions as well. After all, how many times has CR been taken to task for making false statements about their test cars? I seem to recall at least two.
 
And while it's fine if Consumer Reports calls a product a piece of crap beware if they give something a glowing review. Why? Because CR refuses to allow anyone to quote them. Do so and CR files a lawsuit. Sorry my dears, I don't have time for such hypocrisy and self-righteousness. Note to Consuder Reports, it's only an opinion, not a divine judgment. Get off the cross, we need the wood.
 
Now, stepping down off my soapbox, y'all can harbor whatever opinion you want about CR. But please don't belittle mine simply because you don't agree.
#6626 of 7335
05 RL window problem... by flyaway123
Aug 10, 2005 (4:02 pm)
Reply
Does or have anyone had a problem with any window in their 05 RL not lowering? My RL has this problem. The car is in service now and the service manager told me he has two other cars with the same problem but different windows. I would love to pass on a solution. I want my car back! Anyone?
#6627 of 7335
Re: CR [satire] by frisconick
Aug 10, 2005 (7:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: satire (Aug 10, 2005 2:06 pm)

Tell me where has CR been accused of false statements? Peope quote CR all the time, what are you talking about? Make statements of fact, tell me where has CR ever been considered biased? If anything, CR is the most unbiased place of infor in the car world.
#6628 of 7335
A Long-time Subscriber, But Not A Worshipper by washdcguy
Aug 11, 2005 (1:06 am)
Reply
To anyone who believes that CR's opinions on cars is highly worthwhile, you have my unending sympathy. CR's automotive division takes its marching orders from David Champion and Alan Hanks, two rather opinionated individuals, who have long appeared to "guide" the general direction of all CR car reviews that are eventually published. The review of the RL was total hogwash. For example, it's navigation system is much more intelligently laid out than the Infiniti's (as previous CR opinions of Honda systems attest to), is better at recognizing spoken commands, and is accessible while en-route (not just while stopped on the side of the road). But these items were either incorrectly reported or not mentioned in the comparison test. Equally disturbing was the failure to mention the ease of using spoken commands for climate, audio, and essential controls. Instead, the focus was placed on the central layout that Mr. Champion and Hanks appear to dislike. Noise is substantially higher in the Infiniti, especially at idle, but was passed over. Etc. etc. Shame.
 
Because other than its "God-like" opinion of itself, CR is a useful publication when it comes to paints, household products, and the like. However, to take its opinions regarding automobiles, as anything other than just another opinion, is laughable. It's frequency of repair records are tremendously skewed because of its subscriber base (unlike more objective reports than are still available via the internet and other consumer organizations). CR doesn't do objective surveys of the car buying public. It merely sends out "quickie" check off lists to those who already subscribe and buy into the CR mystique. (I know because though I continue to subscribe and get those little check off lists.) But also, over the years, people well acquainted with the publication have told me what sections to view with suspect eyes. If you truly believe CR knows automobiles that well, by all means follow its reports like dogma, like gospel itself.
 
But I strongly recommend that anyone investing in expensive automobiles draw from many sources and in the end, make evaluations based on his/her own personal experiences and preferences. You will be the one sitting in that car, driving on the highway, going to and from work, picking up the kids, and so on. CR's staff will not be in the car with you. CR is just one tool. Nothing more. (Though it is high on CR's agenda that you view it as the only source to go to; an important part of its funding drives and continued existence rests on your assumptions that it is virtually infallible.) But it is not the final source by any means, especially when it comes to automobiles.
 
This little diatribe was, of course, just another opinion.
#6629 of 7335
Re: CR [satire] by jjacura
Aug 11, 2005 (9:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: satire (Aug 10, 2005 2:06 pm)

Not just because I agree with you about CR but more importantly my respect goes out to you for standing up for yourself against the flippy remarks. I have been a little mystified by the "Turncoat" attitude of your assailant anyway. And yes, we indeed do need the wood!

Messages Page 663 of 734
1
...
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
...
734
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement