Sign In Join 



Acura RL

7339 messages,  Last post on Dec 02, 2009 at 9:04 AM

You are in the Acura RL Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Acura RL, Sedan


Messages Page 659 of 734
1
...
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
...
734
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#6581 of 7339
Noted ... by pat HOST
Jul 21, 2005 (8:39 pm)
Reply
Now let's not get any further into things that are not specifically RL related, okay?
 
Back to our subject...
#6582 of 7339
Re: Noted ... [pat] by hendjaz
Jul 22, 2005 (7:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: pat (Jul 21, 2005 8:39 pm)

Pat, I believe cstiles response and our brief discussion of the crash test results is very germaine to the RL and its direct competitors. We are looking forward to the Institute's side testing and results foe the RL. Since the RL had only been fully tested by one of the two testing organizations, it is a legitimate question as to which of the organizations might be more credible. I for one welcome opinions on this as most of us have little knowledge other than reading the test results when they come out.
 
Here's hoping for an RL "double" when it is finally tested in the all important side test by the Institute. Then it will match the A6 and exceed the M35.
#6583 of 7339
Re: Noted ... [hendjaz] by pat HOST
Jul 22, 2005 (7:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: hendjaz (Jul 22, 2005 7:01 am)

This is not the place to debate IIHS vs NHSTA and it's not the place to get into the political forces behind those agencies.
 
Our subject is the RL sedan. We have a News & Views board where in depth examination of the crash testing methodology is appropriate.
 
If you or anyone else wants to discuss this further, let's take it offline instead of continuing to keep this discussion off-track.
 
Thanks.
#6584 of 7339
Re: Noted ... [pat] by jjacura
Jul 22, 2005 (7:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: pat (Jul 22, 2005 7:24 am)

I would agree not to extend this subject as pertains to the comparison between agencies but cstiles information was excellant and did lend credibility to distinguishing the DIFFERENCE. And like hendjaz look forward as we all do to the results of the RL side crash tests with IIHS.
#6585 of 7339
Oil Change Frequency by dib
Jul 22, 2005 (4:31 pm)
Reply
I got my RL on April 1. The manual says change the oil every 7500 miles; dealer says they know what Honda recommends and they respectfully disagree and recommend 3750 mile intervals. When I pushed the service manager, he said he would ignore the message lights and let the dealer's computer dictate what to do.
 
He also says that for the TL, Honda recommends changing the oil but not the filter (!) at 3750 mile intervals and both at 7500 mile intervals which he thinks is ridiculous.
 
This is a very reputable dealer.
 
Thoughts?
 
David B in CT
#6586 of 7339
Re: Oil Change Frequency [dib] by acraandy
Jul 22, 2005 (5:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dib (Jul 22, 2005 4:31 pm)

1st off: You can not change the oil too often, however you can wait too long.
 
That being said:
If the oil says 7500 miles and you follow that guideline to the number I believe you will not have any issues. If you do have an issue, you will be able to produce evidence that you followed the guidelines.
I (and others at my dealership) use the 7500 mile intervals as a feature that seperates the RL cost of ownership from other cars in the same price range.
You are basically dealing with a disagreement between the people who designed, engineered, manufactured, tested and warranteed the engine and the person who sells it. I tend to agree with the former.
#6587 of 7339
Re: Oil Change Frequency [dib] by bodble2
Jul 22, 2005 (9:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dib (Jul 22, 2005 4:31 pm)

Your dealer is full of it. He wants to pad his profit margin. I would not patronize this dealer because they have shown that they do not have your best interest at heart.
#6589 of 7339
Re: Oil Change Frequency [acraandy] by delmar1
Jul 23, 2005 (5:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: acraandy (Jul 22, 2005 5:26 pm)

From multiple dealers, I heard that the first initial oil change should not be performed until the first owner's manual change interval. That point is clearly indicated in the section regarding the break-in of the car.
 
The reason is that the first initial oil fill at the factory includes a special oil additive to aid in the break-in of the engine.
 
??? Anybody have knowledge of that?
 
Also...I agree to the concept that oil is cheap enough to change on a more frequent basis. I subscribe to the 5k rule...as it is more frequent than the 7500...but not where it will not consume too much of my time.
#6590 of 7339
Re: Oil Change Frequency [delmar1] by jjacura
Jul 23, 2005 (7:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: delmar1 (Jul 23, 2005 5:52 am)

Your information is exactly right on the FIRST oil change at 7,500 miles due to the special additive to that break-in oil. After that it really becomes a personal choice comfort level under 7,500 and you'll get different answers from service managers and mechanics depending on their preferences. (I personally like to keep changing out the oil and filter more frequently than 7,500 miles. My 2nd change was at 10,500 along with a tire rotation.

Messages Page 659 of 734
1
...
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
...
734
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement