Sign In Join 



Honda Accord vs Toyota Camry

2806 messages,  Last post on Jul 25, 2009 at 4:28 AM

You are in the Honda Accord Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Honda Accord, Toyota Camry, Sedan


Messages Page 193 of 282
1
...
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
...
282
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1914 of 2806
Re: 2005 LA show impressions [kurtamaxxguy] by moeharri
Jan 19, 2005 (3:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kurtamaxxguy (Jan 18, 2005 5:38 pm)

Would you mind pointing out which part(s) of the Camry's dash is "downright cheap"? I just want to know for comparison sake what your definition of cheap is. Thanks.
#1915 of 2806
Re: differences [ktnr] by cutedh
Jan 19, 2005 (7:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ktnr (Jan 12, 2005 7:39 am)

The Camry does have a auto up feature on the driver's window. Mine came with standard carpet mats too. Also, lets not forget that Camry has the auto dimming electrochroming rearview mirror which is so very much helpful with all those glaring lights out there UNLIKE the accord and the Camry also has the outside heated mirrors UNLIKE the accord. I would choose the Camry any day over the accord. A lot of my friends have also told me that it looks like a very high class car and is one too and with time the Camry is not going to lose its nice looks but the accord will look bland. Also...to let you know that a friend of mine just bought a brand new accord against my wish and advice and since then has regretted it because the dash in her car was misalligned and the steering wheel was crooked. She has returned the car for a Camry and not regretted it so far.
#1916 of 2806
Re: 2005 LA show impressions [kurtamaxxguy] by cutedh
Jan 19, 2005 (7:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kurtamaxxguy (Jan 18, 2005 5:38 pm)

As far as i am concerned and from various magazines that I have read, the car with top notch quality interior is the Camry with its lexus like interior and then the passat and then comes the accord. But, by no means am I trying to say that the accord does not have high quality interior. All of them do.
#1917 of 2806
Accord's seats are hard, ride is very stiff by peterpan
Jan 20, 2005 (10:57 pm)
Reply
Driving the Accord is like riding a touring bike, with a wooden seat, over rough roads!! You can feel every bump, bounce and shake.
 
Handling qualities in both Camry and Accord are not much to brag about, since they are both FWD.
 
Camry's seats are much softer, more cushiony, more comfortable, with just the right amount of back support.
 
The Camry's ride is much quieter and smoother, more like luxury cars. In fact the Camry's ride quality comes pretty close to the top Lexus sedans. It just has more chassis twisting and body rolling in hard maneuvers, things that are barely perceptible to experienced drivers, whereas the Lexus always feels rock solid. Unless you are familiar with the ride qualities of luxury and high-performance cars, you would never be able to discern the Camry's ride quality compared to the Accord's.
 
Drivers should feel more tranquil and less fatigue in a Camry, especially on long trips, for women, children and older people.
 
As Camry and Accord are roughly equivalent in prices, features, performance and reliability, I would favor the Camry to reduce the amount of wear and tear on the bodies and minds of drivers and riders, especially during the long hours of commute or long road trips. After all you want the car to work for you, not you working for the car!
 
For fun and excitement, I have plenty of computer games, some far more exciting and challenging than taking the risks of tearing up roads and terrorizing traffic with my car everyday, as a few Accord drivers think they should.
 
 
Test drive all expensive luxury cars, Lexus, Acura, MB, BMW...before buying your next cars. The guys at Jim Falk's Bevery Hills Lexus will give you a free wild ride that would proves the worth of luxury cars.
 
No, I don't work for Toyota!
#1918 of 2806
Re: Accord's seats are hard, ride is very stiff [peterpan] by richards38
Jan 21, 2005 (11:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: peterpan (Jan 20, 2005 10:57 pm)

Yes, the Camry (at least the LE I test drove in August, '03) is soft and quiet and dull as dishwater.
 
And yes, the Accord rides harder but is more of a driver's car and less of a passenger's car.
 
Fortunately, both the Camry and Accord are excellent cars with respect to reliability and resale value.
 
With respect to seats, the leather seats in the Accord are about the best available IMO....Richard
#1919 of 2806
Re: Accord's seats are hard, ride is very stiff [richards38] by peterpan
Jan 21, 2005 (12:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: richards38 (Jan 21, 2005 11:18 am)

You are probably trying to say the Camry is as dull as the MB S class or Lexus LS430!
 
If you prefer sporty ride, buy the Camry SE.
 
For $1000 more than the LE, it has stiffer suspension tuned for sporty rides,quicker steering, sway bars front and rear, 4-wheel dis brakes, 16" tires, moonroof and a bunch of other standard features. You can also order the GU option which combine the Veh Stability Control and all side airbags for another $1000. Accord does not even have Stability Control option.
 
The SE is the best buy for Camry.
#1920 of 2806
Re: 2005 LA show impressions [cutedh] by 03accordman
Jan 21, 2005 (12:40 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cutedh (Jan 19, 2005 7:48 pm)

Most top magazines have picked the Accord over the Camry. If you look at the interior od both their volume sellers, LE and LX, the interior (IMHO) is much better in the Accord than the Camry.
 
Also, most publications have praised the Accords saets as some of the best around.
 
Having said this, both cars are great and cater to different kind of drivers, some looking for isolation, others looking for feel.
#1921 of 2806
Re: Accord's seats are hard, ride is very stiff [peterpan] by bamacar
Jan 21, 2005 (7:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: peterpan (Jan 21, 2005 12:38 pm)

I think most Accord owners were trying to say the Camry interior was about as dull as the Buick Century and LeSabre!
 
Camry is as close to a S class or LS430 as the Accord is to a BMW 7 series or Aston Martin. In other words, not in the same universe.
#1922 of 2806
Re: Accord's seats are hard, ride is very stiff [peterpan] by richards38
Jan 21, 2005 (10:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: peterpan (Jan 21, 2005 12:38 pm)

Except for the stability control (OK, I'll get that on my next car) my '04 EX-L Accord includes ALL of the features you mention along with others like a telescoping steering wheel and XM radio that weren't available on the Camry.
 
Not sure about this, but the Camry SE might have included one of those silly wing things on the trunk lid and I will not own any car with such junk stuck onto it.
 
The Camry is fine for those who want a soft car--I don't......Richard
#1923 of 2806
Opinion on V6 by bizi
Jan 22, 2005 (12:22 am)
Reply
With recent purchase experience, I'd offer following opinions (well, just opinions):
 
1. Because of trim differences, Accord vs. Camry comparison is best done by comparing competing trim levels. For example, I4 engine comparison and V6 engine comparison could very well yield different results. I was shopping for V6 sedan, so following opinions are for V6 sedans only.
 
2. In currently models, Camry has two different V6 engines. SE has newer 3.3L engine (which is similar to the one used in Toyota Sienna and Lexus RX330), other trims have older 3.0L engine. Performance wise, 3.3L SE is more comparable to Accord V6, which uses single 3.0L engine. Both Toyota 3.3L and Honda 3.0L are smooth and powerful. Toyota may sometimes hesitate at street speed acceleration (see also Sienna and RX330 discussion forums, I have experience on this), Accord maybe a bit slow on down shifting at highway speed (saves gas, I guess). I believe Accord feels a bit more responsive.
 
3. As you know, Toyota go by options, Honda usually only go by trim level with little options (Navigation is the only MFR option for Accord). Toyota gives more flexibility in configuration, but what one wanted in particular may not be easy to get. For V6 trims, Accord usually has a bit lower MSRP compare to similarly equipped Camry. This is often reflected on street prices as well.
 
4. For Camry, not all features available on XLE are available on SE. This could make a tough choice, especially when XLE cannot have the newer 3.3L engine. BTW, XLE has a nice rear A/C vent (rear of center console). Other trims don't have it. Accord has vents under front seats, mostly for heater.
 
5. Some posts mentioned hard ride or noisy cabin of Accord. I suspect these opinions may be influenced by older generations of Accord. In my experience, the current model of Accord doesn't feel any noiser than Camry. Some commentators are saying Accord is too isolated, actually. The ride feel are very different between Accord and Camry, indeed. Accord is taut, but not jarring. Many Acura TSX and TL buyers actually think Accord's too soft. Camry has softer feel, but it's not really that bouncy soft either (and diffrence between SE and XLE is not huge).
 
6. One interesting observation: many people in the forum uses closeness between Camry and Lexus to make a point that Camry is nicer, but few people use "Accord is close to Acura TL" to prove that Accord is nice car:-) Maybe Lexus is better than Acura? Maybe Accord buyers don't need such a comparison?
 
7. Checking many on-line magzines, they usually give edge to Accord. Maybe because it's more "driver-oriented" car?

Messages Page 193 of 282
1
...
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
...
282
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement