Sign In Join 



Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable Sedans Pre-2008

3374 messages,  Last post on Jul 20, 2009 at 1:51 PM

You are in the Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Ford Taurus, Mercury Sable, Sedan


Messages Page 326 of 338
1
...
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
...
338
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#3250 of 3374
Re: 2002 Mercury Sable [vppc] (from: beancounter) by beancounter
Dec 12, 2005 (10:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: vppc (Nov 22, 2005 5:20 pm)

Price? I don't know. But, I have a 2000 Sable LS with 156,000 miles on the std Vulcan V6. Bought it w/ 16,000 miles. With 55,000 miles on the one you're looking at, if there are no maint records, I would change all fluids (cooling, trans, & oil). (At 55,000, trans & cooling should have been done twice already.) Maint is the key to getting max mileage out of any car, but I feel even more so on American cars.
 
While there are certainly the exceptions (but how would you know which ones), I personally don't think people that trade their cars in at 40-50,000 miles do much in the way of maint (why would you spend more than you have to if you're not planning on keeping the car?). I would much rather see you buy a 1 or 2 yr old car w/ under 15 or 16,000 miles. It won't cost you any more to own, and you may have fewer problems with it by not buying somebody else's 55,000 miles of neglect/bad driving habits.
 
If you've already bought it, here's my experience thus far: I bought mine w/ every intention of going 250,000 miles, and at this point, I have no doubt that it will. The only problem of any significance I've had is a starter I replaced last year. Everything else has been routine maint, including in Sept, all new struts & springs (it was my choice to have them done) and lower ball joints. (Ball joints were just starting to show signs of wear. Went ahead and replaced them as long as it was all apart for the struts & sprgs.) Had to switch from 89 oct to 90+ to control the pinging, but I do get better gas mileage, as well as better performance when I want it. Eliminating the pinging will also help me get the 250,000 miles I'm shooting for out of the engine. All fluids have been changed religiously: Oil every 4,000 (hi-way miles), Trans & cooling every year or about 30,000 miles. Got 70,000 miles on my first set of tires. Replaced them w/ the same Continentals and am going to get 100,000 easily this time (only been rotated twice). I keep the car waxed and get the engine cleaned 1x per yr. Once the warranty was up, I have not let the dealer touch my car. I have an excellent mechanic that I have complete faith in. With all that I have done, the car rides, drives, and looks like the day I bought it (despite midwest winters & no garage). There are no leaks or rattles. Engine runs smooth and uses no oil. While my maint cost per thousand miles has gone up slightly each year, depreciation has slowed down considerably now. So, I am expecting my total cost of ownership per thousand miles to be cheaper on this 2nd 100,000 than it was on the 1st. We'll see. Hope this was helpful and good luck w/ what I think is one of the most underated cars on the market.
#3251 of 3374
'03 Taurus- you may have a problem by fixitford
Dec 12, 2005 (2:17 pm)
Reply
If you own a 2003 Ford Taurus the odds are very good that you already have, or are just about to have your Defrost Blower Motor go out.
 
We noticed a puddle of water on the passenger side floor very soon after we bought the car. It turns out that due to a design defect, water can get into the heater system and ends up on the floor. We took the car to the dealer twice (under warranty) to have this addressed. What the dealer didn’t tell us- is that the blower motor and resistor wind up sitting in a puddle of water.
 
You don’t need to be an electrical engineer to figure out what happens next. This week the weather turned cold and the blower motor burned out. Back to dealer, 3rd time, charged nearly $300 to replace the blower motor. They told us sorry, not a warranty issue!
 
Ford has issued at least 2 TSBs on this, and they know it is a design issue. There hasn’t been a recall so they tell you to get lost.
 
If you have a 2003 Taurus, this will probably happen to you. If it already has do us all a favor and file a complaint with the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration. Link below:
 
http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/ivoq/
 
You will need your VIN # to complete the process, but aside from that it is easy.
 
If enough people complain, they may make Ford issue a recall and correct this under warranty.
#3252 of 3374
Good-Bye Taurus by jh1977
Dec 19, 2005 (12:26 pm)
Reply
Ford says 2006 will be the last model year of the Taurus. I once owned a Taurus. Its a shame Ford did not invest more into the Taurus to keep it competitive with the Camry and Accord. At one time years ago, The Taurus was the best selling car in the U.S., outselling the Camry and Accord. Good-Bye Taurus.
#3253 of 3374
Re: Good-Bye Taurus [jh1977] by chuck1
Dec 22, 2005 (9:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: jh1977 (Dec 19, 2005 12:26 pm)

"The Taurus was the best selling car in the U.S., outselling the Camry and Accord. Good-Bye Taurus."
 
Yes, but they made that drastic "jelly bean" design and the Taurus lost the number one spot and never regained it. The Fusion is a great car, the 500 was designed to be very bland, and consequently is not a run away success. Ford needs to fire it's designers and get some young blood in there!
#3254 of 3374
Ok, You were right about the DPFE Sensor-now by bates3
Dec 22, 2005 (5:38 pm)
Reply
First let me say you were right on about the DPFE sensor on my 2000 Taurus that wouldn't idle. Now, I have a new question, please. My automatic headlights do not come on anymore, but the parking lights work automatically. I checked the fuse and it is fine. Is there a separate relay for the headlights? Was told by mechanic that I would just probably need to replace switch, which is $85 at dealership parts. Mechanic did not check just figured that would be my fix. Any suggestions?
#3255 of 3374
Re: Good-Bye Taurus [chuck1] by jh1977
Dec 23, 2005 (11:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: chuck1 (Dec 22, 2005 9:06 am)

I agree 100% Ford destroyed the Taurus with the "jelly bean" design, not updating the car with modern technology to compete with the Camry and Accord. Ford should bring in new Designers for the 500 and Montego (The successors to Taurus and Sable) so the cars can be redesigned. These cars are currently designed for the 65 plus senior citizen crowd and they remind of the 1970s Plymouth Valiant. When the new 3.5 liter engine arrives for the 500/Montego, Ford needs to redesign the 500 and Montego so they can have attractive body styles to appeal to customers in their 20s, 30s, 40s and 50s. The Camry and Accord cars have attractive body styles, why can't the 500 and Montego have the same.
#3256 of 3374
2005 Taurus--move forward when touching brake by semendua
Dec 23, 2005 (5:16 pm)
Reply
Greetings,
 
I have a 2005 Taurus with 33K, 3.0L. I have noticed that only on the first start of the day, for 1-2 minutes, there is a clunking noise each time I press the brake pedal about 1”. The RPM’s go down with the brake pedal and the car will move forward (very slightly). It does this everyday on only the first start of the day. The Ford dealer had an engineer from Ford look at it. They ended up saying that they tried other Taurus on the lot and saw the same problem. They say that no one had ever complained about this problem, and were not sure what was causing it.
 
Any of you out there have a 2005 Taurus that you can test to see if you have this problem?
 
Thanks, David
#3257 of 3374
Re: Should this be "Tauri" [L8_Apex] by alek_medic
Dec 23, 2005 (7:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: L8_Apex (Apr 24, 2000 2:34 am)

stumbled upon this one :
 
Ford Taurus owner manuals 1996-2006
#3258 of 3374
Re: Good-Bye Taurus [jh1977] by chuck1
Dec 23, 2005 (10:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jh1977 (Dec 23, 2005 11:26 am)

"Ford needs to redesign the 500 and Montego so they can have attractive body styles to appeal to customers in their 20s, 30s, 40s and 50s. The Camry and Accord cars have attractive body styles, why can't the 500 and Montego have the same."
 
JH, I agree with everything you have said. My only comment is that the 500 will probably appeal to the 45 year age group if it were designed properly. It needs a little more excitement. I think the Fusion is a step in the right direction!
#3259 of 3374
2002 Mercury Sable GS by romanrubene
Dec 24, 2005 (9:01 am)
Reply
Do somebody know where is located the power window fuse and how many amps uses? All the windows refuse to work.
I just suspect the problem is with the power window fuse.
 
Thank you for your attention.
 
Ruben E.

Messages Page 326 of 338
1
...
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
...
338
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement