You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis
Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis

3244 messages, Last post on Aug 25, 2009 at 8:13 PM
You are in the Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
| DOES ANYONE KNOW IF THERE ARE ANY MAJOR CHANGES PLANEED IN THE DESIGN OF THE CROWN VIC/GRAND MARQUIS FOR 2001 | |
| Have a 88 302 that began leaking oil from intake manifold area--found out a small filter under the PVC valve was plugged up.Changed it & all o-k..Anyone step into this one too ??? | |
| I am going to purchase soon, either a Buick LeSabre or Grand Marquis. I guess everybody here would recommend the Grand Marquis. Please give me reasons why I should purchase the Grand Marquis? | |
|
|
|
both cars are nice and well built. the interior quality in the Grand Marquis is a little better. And even if some say the 3800 is a good motor, I know from owning one in my Tbird that the 4.6 v8 Ford is bulletproof. Now I know why law enforcement professionals rave about the CV. Otherwise it just boils your preference of v6/fwd vs. v8/rwd. Either way, they are solid cars for decent price. |
|
|
|
|
One other thing... If you life in an area with a temperate climate or in a snow area, ordering drivetrain traction control for the Grand Marquis is a must since it's RWD. Trust me... I've driven my '95 Fleetwood in weather my own father wouldn't even drive in, and the traction control works wonders by keeping the car stable during bad road conditions. (Unless, of course, I go in snow above my bumper... Then I'm as stuck as anybody else. Also, don't make the mistake of thinking the traction control is a license to do something stupid like drive faster than you normally would in poor driving conditions.) If you are planning on doing a little spirited driving in the Grand Marquis should you purchase one, you might also want to consider the ride and handling package. It won't turn it into a Ferrari, but it does firm the ride up a bit (especially around corners) without sacrificing smoothness. IMHO, even though the Grand Marquis is a better value, I like the styling of the '00 Crown Victoria better... |
|
Don't worry about the old man complex. I'm 37 and will be buying a CV or MGM next year. There are some other people who post here who are the same age as both of us, too. The thing I like about the CV/MGM is the price, ride comfort, and safety rating. Buying a CV/MGM doesn't mean you're an old man. It just means you recognize value in a car when you see it. Enjoy your new Grand Marquis.
|
|
| it has the touring package, ABS, Air suspension, leather interior. Or buy the Buick and get a free lifetime subscription to AARP's MODERN MATURITY. | |
|
|
|
Don't worry about the "old man complex." I'm only 20, and I drive a behemoth geezermobile '95 Fleetwood. Seriously, though... You shouldn't worry about what others think. As Steve said, you're recognizing exceptional value when you see it. If you're like me, you're also looking for practicality... And the Grand Marquis certainly has it due to its ample interior room and cargo space. Oh, and pay no attention to kinley... He thinks that Lincoln Town Cars should perform like Ferraris... (No offense, kinley. *Smirks*) He does make a couple valid points, though. I'd insist upon ABS, traction control, and the ride and handling package for the benefit of the rear air suspension. Those improvements will make the GM all the more enjoyable. One last thing... The Buick rode harder because it's FWD, as opposed to the RWD drivetrain of the Mercury. Let's face it... RWD cars will always ride better than their FWD counterparts. |
|
| How much will the touring package take away from the GM's soft ride. I do not want to add harshness to the ride. | |
|
|
|
It shouldn't detract too much from the Grand Marquis ride. In fact, the difference should be barely perceptible. The official Mercury website says the package contains the following: 3.55:1 rear axle ratio (aids in transmission downshifting) Larger diameter rear stabilizer bar (aids in vehicle stability during agressive cornering or emergency maneuvers) Goodyear BSW “handling” tires (nothing really special, here, and good if you choose to do without whitewall tires) Uniquely tuned rear air suspension (must make the ride a little firmer, but still be able to soak up bumps with no fuss) 16” lacy-spoke aluminum wheels Dual exhaust (ups engine output to 215 h.p. which wouldn't hurt) So in other words, this package will make the Grand Marquis more stable in quick maneuvers, but the ride should not be harsh. In fact, it should still be as soft as you experienced it when you test drove that other GM. If in doubt, just ask the Ford/Mercury/Lincoln dealer to test drive one with the ride and handling package, and see for yourself if you would rather do without it. At the very least, though, order it with the rear air suspension... It not only keeps the tail from dragging, but accounts for the smooth ride without the car pitching and rolling all over the place. I wish they married Ford's superb rear air suspension to my Cadillac. You'd then have the ultimate luxo barge.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis
Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Ford Crown Victoria
2010 Mercury Grand Marquis



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats