Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis
3244 messages, Last post on Aug 25, 2009 at 8:13 PM
You are in the Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
|
|---|---|
My '94 GM LS will be turning 200k miles by tomorrow. I've had it since day one and it's been the best car I've ever had. If that GM seems good to you, buy it! It's probably got tons of good miles left, and then you can worry about what to do with it. 
|
|
| Hello all,,Glad I found this forum.I have an issue I cant figure out.MY 1987 Crown Vic has lost its mind and backbone too.I went to pass a car the other day and I didnt get the normal downshift for passing,but thats okay,,I made it around the other car.Worst part was after I parked the car, now when I start it ,it acts like it is in gear or something. Like the wheels want to turn when it is started.I thought it might be something like the older cars with modulator valves,but after buying one for the model car I have,I cant find the dang thing on the transmission anywhere.So,thats one question I have,where is the modulator valve on a 1987 Crown Vic,secondly I also heard someone the kickdown cable bushing may have got worn out or broke and/or something, I got it tied back on with a ziptie..If anyone has an exploded view or diagram please email it to me even a link to where one is will be helpful,,same for the kickdown cable,where the bushing is suppose to be at.Thanks a bunch and thanks even more for having this forum so maybe a stupid man like me can try to fix my own car. | |
|
One of my best friends works for the highway patrol and has stated that they seem to be having much more trouble with the transmission on later model CV's than what they used a few years ago. Knowing that Ford hasn't done any makeovers of the tranny, I was wondering if "regular" users were noticing that same problem. Now, I realize that those guys and gals do things none of us would probably want to with our cars, but even given that he states that they're having a lot more 25,000-35,000 mile replacements of the tranny whereas they usually made it to the 50,000 mile mark (when they sell them at auction). HOPING that Ford will update this car soon (3 valve 4.6 and a few other upgrades) I'd consider myself in the future market for one, but if the tranny's are becoming more suspect that is definitely something to watch out for. Just curious, what say you all?
|
|
|
Replying to: bigunit67 (Jun 10, 2005 11:35 am)  
|
|
|
Hi! Which car cover do you guys recommend? The Ford one runs about $230 which I heard is what good and customized car covers cost. Thanks for your help.
|
|
|
Replying to: skysba (Jun 12, 2005 8:14 am) Any help would be appreciated.
|
|
|
Replying to: basils (Jun 13, 2005 5:10 am)  . I'm still amazed that a factory dual exhaust system can boost hp by more than 10... I've heard that it really doesn't make that big a difference. I'm quite sure that if you get an LX with the handling package, you retain the chrome accents. Also, isn't the antenna in the rear window now, too? It looks like my 2004 LX has a rear window antenna.
|
|
|
The Crown Victoria/Grand Marquis is a joke to have only 224-239 HP. It was acceptable until about 2001. The Honda Accord V6 puts out 240 HP (starting in 2002) and from a SOHC 3.0L while the CW/GM requires a 4.6L V8. When is Ford going to update these engines? They need to up the HP to 300 to get respect from their customers. The 2006 Toyota Avalon puts out 280HP from a 3.5L V6 and so does the Infinity engines.
|
|
|
|
| (Note to self: same person will be complaining about the poor fuel economy when gas starts selling for four dollars a gallon or more...) | |
|
Replying to: batista (Jun 13, 2005 4:40 pm) In all fairness my friend, you're not really accurate. Have you ever driven both? I did, in the same hour as a matter of fact. The V-6 in the 2006 Avalon does have great horsepower output, but this is at a higher rpm than a Crown Vic. When I drove the Avalon I noticed that it did have good power at higher rpm, but it lacked torque of any kind. The Toyota didn't even compare at all with the Vic when it came to the smoothness and quiteness department either. My wife even noticed it and she doesn't know a thing about cars! We both thought the Crown Vic felt much more substantial and even more powerful....just not as jerky as an Avalon. And the Toyota engine REQUIRES high octane unleaded in order to get the full hp out of it. The Ford just needs regular. Hey, some of these new Mitsubishis are putting out volumnes of hp from 4 banger engines....but would they drive nice or be powerful AND comfortable? No way. The Avalon is also about 5 grand more than the Crown Vic....and not worth it in my book. Like I said, drive both, side by side like I did, THEN decide which car feels like a luxury model and the other one a toy. Sorry bud, V-8 wins every time! |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Ford Crown Victoria
2010 Mercury Grand Marquis
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
