You are here: Forums Sedans Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis

Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis

3244 messages,  Last post on Aug 25, 2009 at 8:13 PM

You are in the Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Grand Marquis, Exterior, Sedan

Messages Page 249 of 325 1 ... 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 ... 325 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#2479 of 3244 Re: 92 MGM -Gear selector lever cable fixed! by maytag87 May 02, 2005 (12:42 pm)
Replying to: pat (Apr 29, 2005 8:21 am) Good afternoon folks,   Here was the message that helped me fix the problem: jamesjones000 - I had the same problem in my '92 and with mom's '94 Grand Marquis. If you remove the covers under the steering column, you should find where the shift cable connects to the an arm in the linkage. On both of our cars, 2 torx screws in the arm connected to the cable were either loose or falling out completely. Tighten these (and check for any others that may be loose) and you should notice easier shifting instantly. You may need to adjust the cable where it connects to the transmission, but most likely this should do the trick. ------- Well the two t-30 torx screws that are the on the column mount point were loose enough - just about ready to fall off. The bracket was even loose enough to be crooked rather than straight, not sitting flush on the column mount point as it should be. Tightened up those two screws, no others appeared loose, and outstanding results - shifts perfect now!   Thanks a lot for that tip!! Rob Replies to this message: pat (May 02, 2005 12:45 pm)
#2480 of 3244 Re: 92 MGM -Gear selector lever cable fixed! [maytag87] by pat HOST May 02, 2005 (12:45 pm)
Replying to: maytag87 (May 02, 2005 12:42 pm) Great, glad to hear it!!   Where did you find that message? I could link to it, but I can't find a poster by that name.
#2481 of 3244 Re: 06' Crown Vic [mystique] by pantherapardus May 02, 2005 (1:56 pm)
Replying to: mystique (Apr 27, 2005 1:32 pm) Look at the 2005 to see the 2006. At the NYC Int. Auto show in March, I asked the Mercury people what the deal was on the 2006 "freshening" of the GM(CV). They snapped back - "None". I explained I had read several things about there being a minor face lift in 2006 and a more substantial change in 2008 and that the St. Thomas plant manager indicated to a local paper that these coincided with $100m & $250m investments in the plant. They again replied there is going to be one re-freshening in 2007. I then told them that I understand the 500/Montego would be re-skinned that year, are they confusing the two - also the GM/CV are "due" for a 3 year grill change at least. There reply, "No, we mean the CV/GM are to be re-styled in 2007". This confused me a bit, but I will take them at their word. After thinking it over, it made a little more sense to me that a freshening might happen in the model year following an investment. So I have accepted this as the way things are going to be for now.   Pantera Pandus Replies to this message: euphonium (May 02, 2005 3:01 pm) mystique (May 02, 2005 6:30 pm)
#2482 of 3244 Re: 06' Crown Vic [pantherapardus] by euphonium May 02, 2005 (3:01 pm)
Replying to: pantherapardus (May 02, 2005 1:56 pm) I can't think of a better way to kill sales of 05 units than telling you there will be a major change in the 06 models.   Should the Mercury people be right and the 06's are warmed over 05's, I will be looking into motorcars produced in Coventry in 04 with low mileage - and they are out there, some still new on the dealer's lots.   Brand new 04 Town Cars still for sale in Portland advertised at 15k off MSRP, but who wants a '98 in '06?
#2483 of 3244 Re: 06' Crown Vic [pantherapardus] by mystique May 02, 2005 (6:30 pm)
Replying to: pantherapardus (May 02, 2005 1:56 pm) Ok thanks, I suppose the look would not have changed that much anyways. The 03' looks just like the 98' to 02' save for the LX wheels. Have you heard about the 3 valve V8 being used at all?
#2484 of 3244 2006 Changes by jsylvester May 03, 2005 (9:20 am)
Would be for the 2007 models that go on sale in the fall of 2006. At least, that is my take.   I'm still using as my back-up car my 94 Grand Marquis (actually, my parents are driving it right now, as their 2002 CRV just got hammered by a Yukon XL in an accident, and it is out of action for about 4 weeks), but I'd like to replace it and the 2000 Intrepid at the same time with a new Grand Marquis. I'm waiting on an updated powertrain, so I'm right there with you hoping for the upgraded 4.6 and a 5-speed auto ASAP.   The new Charger pursuit vehicle is the only thing that will make Ford get off it's butt and upgrade the best platform they have from a longevity and durability standpoint.
#2485 of 3244 Re: Ford Crown Victoria SVT [lexusrocks] by tbear503 May 04, 2005 (6:54 am)
Replying to: lexusrocks (Mar 25, 2005 3:45 am) Autoweek ( www.autoweek.com ) shows the '06 Explorer.. says it will definitely have the 3-valve Mustang motor...Let's hope this carries over to the CV/GM
#2486 of 3244 Crown Vic/Grand Marquis rear end problems? by turbo301 May 04, 2005 (8:11 am)
I have a 1985 Grand Marquis whose rear end virtually liquidated itself one day about 12 years ago. We (my family, who bought the car new) were about thirty seconds from getting onto the freeway when it appears some sort of retaining pin or something slipped out and got caught in the gears, leading to a total failure; it blew a hole right in the pumpkin, and the mechanic who replaced the rear (no hope of a rebuild!) was shocked at just how damaged the thing was. He said that, had we gotten onto the highway before the failure, the rear axles could have slipped right out and caused, well, a serious accident.   At the time, the car had about 60,000 km. Of course, the car was out of warranty when this happened, so Ford did jack all as far as help is concerned. I was wondering if anyone is aware of a problem with these cars' rear ends, or was this just a very unfortunate fluke? The replacement rear (3.08 gears instead of the original 3.55s, unfortunately) has held up fine; the car now has 103,000 km.   BTW in case anyone is interested, my car is a base model, but with 15" wheels and the handling package. It had to be custom ordered because we never found ANY Grand Marquis at the dealerships that had the handling package; lots of digital clocks and lame formal roofs, but no handling packages!   Thanks for any help!   P.S. Now that I'm starting my first job, I'm looking at getting myself a 2004 Crown Vic. I'm amazed at how totally different they are from the '85! I know that some accuse the 4.6L of being a bit underpowered, but compared to the carburetted 5.0L, it's a screamer!">
#2488 of 3244 Re: Tie Rod Ends [dbc123] by markerman May 08, 2005 (6:47 am)
Replying to: dbc123 (Mar 26, 2005 5:14 pm) How long can I expect a 92 CV alternator to last? I have 125,000 miles on the original alternator and I am amazed! I drove General Motors' cars in the 70' and 80' and had to rebuild the alternator every 30,000 miles or so.

Messages Page 249 of 325 1 ... 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 ... 325 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Sedans Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis