Sign In Join 



Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis

3244 messages,  Last post on Aug 25, 2009 at 8:13 PM

You are in the Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Grand Marquis, Exterior, Sedan


Messages Page 247 of 325
1
...
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
...
325
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2456 of 3244
Would it be possible for Ford to... by bigunit67
Mar 13, 2005 (3:01 pm)
Reply
Could Ford alter the Panther platform to incorporate an AWD option, or would that necessitate moving to a stretched "500" platform, like one link said the company is planning to do with the TC?
 
I don't know if they'd want to steal any thunder from the 500, but if it were possible to modify the Panther platform so that they could squeeze 2-3 more inches in to the backseat area it would really be an upgrade for the car.
 
The folks talking about inserting the 300 HP engine from the Mustang are hitting that on the head. Ford's V-8's are trumped by many competitiors V-6's. Diamler-Chrysler and GM are showing that engine technology exists that can help get a few more MPG in highway mileage situations...where is Ford on this front?
 
Final thought...With the discussion of hybrid technology ever increasing, is it possible to incorporate THAT into the CV/GM/TC set-up? I've read before the engine bay won't accomodate the 5.4L engine from the F-150, but could a battery be installed that would help with fuel economy/total engine power and possibly "introduce" this car to a new market of consumers??? If not the engine bay, perhaps the top shelf of the trunk...Honda has put their battery for the Accord in the trunk, so it's not exactly unheard of.
 
Just a few rants/thoughts from a guy that owns a 98 Regal GS and would like to buy a CV/GM...albeit with a few modifications
 
Thanks...
#2457 of 3244
spark knock in 2003 GM by gene42
Mar 14, 2005 (5:24 pm)
Reply
Mostly in warm weather, when accelerating at low speed, I get what I think is spark knock in my 2003 GM. Dealer looked at it and made some parts changes in the computer which he said were part of a technical service bulletin advisory.
 
Still getting the knock (like marbles rolling around). Should I move up to a higher octane or seek to have timing adjusted? I don't mind using a higher octane but I don't want to mess up the computer setting. Is the moderate knocking seriously harmful?
#2458 of 3244
Re: spark knock in 2003 GM [gene42] by lostwrench
Mar 14, 2005 (7:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gene42 (Mar 14, 2005 5:24 pm)

Before "messing" with the computer,I would try going to a different gas station or two. At times, there is some baaaad gas out there. If no improvement,I would go up to a higher octane. Pinging occurs when the gas burns as more of an explosion within the cylinder. A higher octane gas burns with a smoother woosh. All octanes have the same "power", it is a matter of how smoothly they burn.
#2459 of 3244
Tie-rod failure by ronald1
Mar 15, 2005 (6:53 pm)
Reply
I experienced a tie-rod failure on my '99 GM with 124K miles. Given the number of miles on the vehicle, the failure of any component can not be considered unusual. The reason I am posting this event is not that the tie-rod failed, but rather the way it failed.
 
I drove this car since it was new and when I drove to work on Monday the vehicle handled as well as when it was new. On my way home the tie-rod end failed. Like a light bulb failure - no warning except for a few unusual steering feedback occurrences (like low tire air pressure) in the final three miles. In the past my vehicles have always shown signs of front end part wear for many miles before I had parts replaced. I have never experienced an actual front end component failure before this.
 
Is the rather sudden failure of my tie-rod end a freak occurrence?
#2460 of 3244
Blank Digital Dash, AGAIN on 2000 GM by dmers
Mar 16, 2005 (10:51 am)
Reply
I have to report that our Electronic Dash fuse is blowing again on our 2000 GM/LS w/93K miles. The Ford shop now disconnected the passenger Sun visor w/mirror light as well as the driver Sun visor w/mirror light and garage door opener__ for another $69.00 repair 3 months later. This seems to have cured the problem. We chose not to purchase the $800.00 replacement sun visors.
 
I see why Ford/Merc/Linc have gone to the stationary inflexible dual sun visors to quietly correct this problem. I feel dual sun visors should be standard on all cars, like delay wipers eventually became standard on most vehicles.
 
The 2000 model secondary dual visor was very adjustable vs the stationary secondary is not today.
 
dmers
#2461 of 3244
Re: Tie-rod failure [ronald1] by lostwrench
Mar 17, 2005 (7:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ronald1 (Mar 15, 2005 6:53 pm)

I,too,have a 99 GM bought new. 53,000 miles-my baby. Tie rod failure = ? Did it separate from the wheel assembly or did the connecting sleeve, which is quite thin, bend? Need more info. Thanks.
#2462 of 3244
Re: Tie-rod failure [lostwrench] by ronald1
Mar 18, 2005 (2:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lostwrench (Mar 17, 2005 7:32 pm)

The outer tie-rod end separated from the driver side wheel assembly.
#2463 of 3244
Re: Tie-rod failure [ronald1] by lostwrench
Mar 18, 2005 (3:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ronald1 (Mar 18, 2005 2:48 pm)

Total separation! I would say that is a rare occurrence. (Unless a curb or other immovable object was hit recently, or when the car was parked,with its wheels in the far right or left turn position, another vehicle hit a front wheel. No evidence of impact on a front wheel/tire/wheel cover? Do inspect the other tie rod end.)
#2464 of 3244
Re: Tie-rod failure [lostwrench] by ronald1
Mar 19, 2005 (1:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lostwrench (Mar 18, 2005 3:28 pm)

I can't remember any time where I hit a pothole or bumped a curve with my '99 GM that would explain the tie-rod end failure. It was this fact that there was no obvious incident to cause the tie-rod end failure that led me to have all four tie rod-ends replaced. (two on each side) $600 including the tow and a front end alignment.
#2465 of 3244
Re: Tie-rod failure [ronald1] by lostwrench
Mar 19, 2005 (9:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ronald1 (Mar 19, 2005 1:37 pm)

A 99 Merc with 4 tie rod ends? No such animal. If they charged you for 4, tell them you want your money back for 2, and the labor cost for replacing the phantom 2. (Are you sure you don't mean ball joints? There are 4 of them.)

Messages Page 247 of 325
1
...
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
...
325
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement