You are here: Forums Sedans Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis

Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis

3244 messages,  Last post on Aug 25, 2009 at 8:13 PM

You are in the Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Grand Marquis, Exterior, Sedan

Messages Page 234 of 325 1 ... 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 ... 325 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#2331 of 3244 Re: More questions about my [marsha7] by nvbanker Nov 27, 2004 (9:18 am)
Replying to: marsha7 (Nov 18, 2004 4:16 pm) The HVAC system is designed to bring the interior of the car to the temperature you have set it for as quickly as possible, regardless of the method you have prescribed, VENT or AUTO, so if you have it set on 72 for example, and you push VENT, and the interior of the car is 85 from sitting in the sun, it's going to fire up the fan to cool down the interior with that cool outside air until it reaches the desired 72 degrees. Then it will begin to throttle back the fan automatically, unless you override the fan control, which apparently, you do. It's what Automatic Climate Control is all about. But you can always override it.
#2332 of 3244 Re: Radio Volume and Climate controls by samnoe Nov 27, 2004 (4:59 pm)
That's one of the reasons I hate auto temperature control. Another reason is it's much more difficult to use than usual manual controls. Especially in the new design which Ford introduced lately (in the 500, Freestyle, Freestar/Monterey, etc.) it's even more complicated.   And about the radio volume, I have the same "feature" in my Windstar. The manual states that whenever you start the engine, the volume will be reset to a comfortable volume. in case you put your volume way too up, it shouldn't scare you or other people, and especially if you get a remote starter and your radio has been left in a very high volume position, it will not be good...   But I do agree that even the 'reset' feature should be at a higher volume. The current setting is too low for me. And maybe Ford should offer this feature "optional", so you can turn it on or off to your liking. (sweet dreams).
#2333 of 3244 by nvbanker Nov 27, 2004 (5:45 pm)
Not all new ideas are good ones - complain in places like this one, e-mail the company. Usually you don't hear back, but they are listening....I assure you, and they do read these boards. The engineers are told to read these boards and monitor these discussions very regularly.
#2334 of 3244 I appreciate the answers by marsha7 Nov 27, 2004 (7:51 pm)
you all have given me...at least I am not alone in the woods...any thoughts on how long it takes for the engine to break in where I can get the sticker 17 city/25 hwy MPG???...I have 7200 miles on it now, since August 1, and the hwy mpg does not surpass 20-21 mpg...thoughts???
#2335 of 3244 by ehaase Nov 28, 2004 (3:29 pm)
My 2004 Crown Victoria has consistently given 20 mpg in town and 26 mpg on the highway from the day I got it.
#2336 of 3244 pricing of 1999 Crown Vic by haup Nov 29, 2004 (3:59 pm)
I have a 1999 Crown Vic with 103000 miles, 65% of which are highway; perfect condition, new Michelen tires, silver, purrs; high 20's on the hwy since new. I am buying a new Highlander. My dilemma: is there anyone out there who would not be scared of the mileage, or should I just forget it and trade it in?
#2337 of 3244 Mileage by jsylvester Nov 29, 2004 (7:55 pm)
I would not be afraid of that kind of mileage. That being said, depreciation should be substantial either way. I don't think you would have that difficult of a time selling it privately. Your trade-in woudl not be that great.
#2338 of 3244 Should I buy a CV/GM ? by bdeyes333 Nov 30, 2004 (6:46 pm)
OK Guys, here's my dilemma. Wife Wants to get a Camry or Accord for our next car. we've got a 99 Chev Malibu (AKA Boat Anchor) right now. My preference is a good old RWD Full frame Car.Since the Choices these days are limited I suggested the CV/GM. I'm seeking advice as to the reliability of theses two vehicles. Have never owned anything except General Motors products (a few RWD) and have had so-so luck with most of them.Think it's time for a change but not sold on the hype about Japanese cars being better etc.Is Ford a good choice ?Not concerned with depreciation or resale value as We will be keeping this car for the long term. Most likely looking at a 1 or 2 year old model with low mileage. I'm From Toronto, Ontario Canada and we have alot of these cars around here,mostly older owners. I'm 40 but can see the value of having a big car to feel safe while driving.Any Comments or caveats would be greatly appreciated.                    Many Thanks, BD Eyes
#2339 of 3244 I've had very good luck with my '98 Vic by iusecad Dec 01, 2004 (10:17 am)
in the 2 years & 17k miles I've owned it, even though it was an "abused" Sheriff's car. (Actually I feel the deputy that drove it treated it like he owned it.)   As to whether you should buy one, the only concern I might have is if you want to go back to RWD in the snow. That's the only thing I hate about having a Vic. But in the past I had a 4x4 to drive, and now this winter I have a Focus and a Taurus, so the Vic can stay in the garage when the snow flies...
#2340 of 3244 BDEyes - Re: Accord-Camry-CV/GM choice - by harmar2 Dec 01, 2004 (12:02 pm)
My last Toyota & Honda were '77 models. Both were extremely reliable, and I never had to argue, plead or fight with either if something went wrong during warranty. Consumer Reports data seem to suggest their reliability is still high.   Your wife should take a test drive in cars under consideration. (But a short test drive may not fully bring out the factors cited below.) A buddy and I alternate driving to visit places, with drive times ranging from 2 -10 hours. He has a '01 Accord. He absolutely loves my GM for these trips, because it is comfortable and quiet. His Accord has a stiff ride. It is noisy; you have to raise your voice when conversing at 70 mph. And its seats are lower, meaning your legs are practically straight when sitting rather than having more knee bend in my GM. (My lower back sometimes hurts after a long ride in his Accord.) When we get to our destination, I am happy, because his car is just plain uncomfortable for me. We have no such problems in my GM, and he fully admits that.   So - your wife may well find her desire for an Accord or Camry is trumped by creature comfort factors present in the CV/GM.   Good luck with the decisions.

Messages Page 234 of 325 1 ... 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 ... 325 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Sedans Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis