Sign In Join 



Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis

3244 messages,  Last post on Aug 25, 2009 at 8:13 PM

You are in the Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Grand Marquis, Exterior, Sedan


Messages Page 232 of 326
1
...
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
...
326
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2303 of 3244
Love My '94 GM! by ragdollgirl
Sep 23, 2004 (8:19 am)
Reply
I have a '94 GM with almost 191k miles. Love it! Still has original suspension - rides great. It has a few electronic problems, such as non-working air bags and a blinking "check engine" light, which will be looked at shortly. Wish I knew how much it would cost to fix the short in the air bag wires -- I've been told it could be substantial, depending on how long it takes to trace down the short. Otherwise, except for the blue smoke it blows, it's a wonderful car and even though I'm starting to get new car fever, I hesitate to just give this car away, which is what I'd be doing. What are the planned updates for 2006? Major restyle or what? If the updates are exciting, I may wait for them (if the car cooperates).
#2304 of 3244
jsylvester by marsha7
Sep 24, 2004 (6:05 am)
Reply
But they could have made the info center an option w/o the digital dash; I hope the 2006 will have a 300 HP engine like the Marauder, or at least 275 HP w/325 ft lbs...a race car for older people and young people "in the know"...a tachometer would be nice, even tho it is an auto trans, side marker lights like the Grand Marq would be helpful (my 83 GM had them, and it illuminates the side of the road like a baseball field at a night game when your signal light is flashing)...keep the floor shifter and bucket seats, of course...moonroof option might be nice...DEFINITELY an audiophile 6-CD in dash unit with 250/300 watts, like some of Ford's other vehicles (like Mountaineer)...I also appreciate the power reclining seats with adj inflatable lumbar support in driver and passenger, was almost the sole reason to buy the car...most Fords, I believe, have manual reclining seats, few have power recliners...
 
Also, years prior to 2004 (don't know which ones. specifically), the Crown Vic taillights had amber signal lights on the bottom of the red lens... they made it all red in 2004...I have always believed that amber flashing signal/emergency lights are much more visible at night than all red...why did Ford make that change, when they already had the design, engineering and wiring for the amber/red lights???...it just seems to me that the vehicle was safer with amber, and they retrograde it to be all red...why???
#2305 of 3244
by jsylvester
Sep 25, 2004 (5:11 am)
Reply
Moonroof is a factory option, I believe it was added to the option list part-way through the 2004 model year.
 
On the CD player, not sure why they still go with a trunk-mounted one. Similar story on the tail light lenses. The only thing I can come up with is since the car has a huge fleet purchase percentage, maybe the decision has something to do with that.
 
Let's hope the interior has a major reworking for 2004. It is currently not bad, but some of the features are out of date.
#2306 of 3244
Amber Signal lamp by samnoe
Sep 28, 2004 (9:01 pm)
Reply
is really much better than the red one. i agree. I have no idea why Ford started to change everything to red, including the Freestar.
 
But so are other brands doing. Example, the new GM minivans will have red lamps, and Toyota minivan got red lamps as well.
 
Seems that ford tries to match all rear signal lamps, to match the Explorer/Expeditions looks.
#2307 of 3244
by johnclineii
Sep 29, 2004 (2:35 am)
Reply
Sometimes I think it is only change for change's sake, as in make them buy the new one cause it is different than the old one. I can't possibly imagine that anyone would think that would work very well on CV/GM owners. Most are far too practical (and sensible) for that.
#2308 of 3244
Re: sidvid2 - re: squeaks - [harmar2] by sidvid2
Sep 29, 2004 (3:53 pm)
Reply

Replying to: harmar2 (Sep 18, 2004 9:51 pm)

Thanks harmar2,
 
That was a lot of useful information! I have an appointment with Ford tomorrow to take it in along with my list. Hopefully they will be able to correct these things.
 
I will be sure to take in your note and suggestions with me as an FYI of some things to look for.
 
It is nice to have this source of experience the forum provides in dubugging issues that many owners have been through.
 
Thanks Again
#2309 of 3244
samnoe by marsha7
Oct 13, 2004 (8:38 am)
Reply
On the previous design Explorer, the signal lights were also amber, but the taillights were, naturally, red...they changed to all red on the 2002 redesign of the Explorer...it wasn't so many years ago (1960s, 1970s) that ALL of the imports had amber signal lights, British, Swedish, Italian, German, etc...that's how you could tell an import on the freeway a full mile ahead of you, was that you could see the amber signal lights over a mile away, all American cars had ONLY red, until sometime in the late 80s/early 90s, Buick/Olds actually put amber signal lights on a few of their larger, luxury models...considering the safety factor, I cannot see why it would be something that is changed from year to year...plus, it gives you extra bulbs in the back, so if your taillight bulb breaks, you still have amber signal lights, but if it is all red, a bad bulb may cause you to lose parking lights (lower filament) and brake and signal lights and 4-way flashers (upper filament)...another reason for amber, is that it is a separate bulb and circuit for signal lights and 4-way flashers...so, why do they change it???
#2310 of 3244
by johnclineii
Oct 13, 2004 (3:23 pm)
Reply
My guess? Cost containment and lack of customer demand for an otherwise costly feature...
#2311 of 3244
2005 Grand Marquis by jsylvester
Oct 21, 2004 (7:59 pm)
Reply
Anybody seen any new 2005's? All the dealers are still selling off the 04's, but from what I understand, the beginning of the model year is mostly fleet purchases on the production schedule.
 
I'm holding out to see what the 06 looks like, but to be honest, my 94 runs so well I cannot see me getting rid of it anytime soon.
#2312 of 3244
Rear axle problem on '03 GM by gene42
Oct 24, 2004 (11:58 am)
Reply
After hearing an axle noise on my '03 GM with 16000 miles on it, I brought it to the dealer for warranty repair. The dealer replaced both rear axle drive shafts, bearings, seals etc. and refilled differential assembly. There was no charge to me and dealer said that there was a recall on the rear axle problem due to faulty materials used at the factory. He said that he has repaired many GM vehicles under the "recall".
 
I received no notice of such a recall being in effect and wonder why. Was the rear axle problem not consisdered dangerous? Is there such a thing as a "silent recall"?

Messages Page 232 of 326
1
...
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
...
326
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement