Sign In Join 



Mazda 626

2018 messages,  Last post on Oct 09, 2009 at 1:07 PM

You are in the Mazda 626 Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Mazda 626, Sedan


Messages Page 6 of 202
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
202
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#51 of 2018
. by ateixeira
Mar 01, 2000 (5:46 pm)
Reply
Quite fast if you just rev the engine a bit.


It's geared short for acceleration, my only complaint is that 5th gear could be a little taller, or there could be a 6th cruising gear to save gas.


Minor nit-pick, I know.


-juice
#52 of 2018
Purchasing A Used Mazda by jmazda
Mar 02, 2000 (6:23 pm)
Reply
I was just wondering if anyone has any advice for me purchasing a used mazda. It is a 1991 Mazda with 40,000 miles. Its has a manual transmission and is loaded with a lot of options. I have a choice between that car and others that are similar but, with 80,000+ miles. I was wondering if anyone has had or knows someone that owns a 1990-1992 mazda 626, and if so, has there been any problems since you/they have had the car. I would greatly appreciate any advice from anyone about this.
#53 of 2018
. by ateixeira
Mar 02, 2000 (6:57 pm)
Reply
Ours is newer, but we purchased it largely based upon the great reputation of the model years that came before it.


That should be reliable, just make sure the mileage is accurate. Check the pedals to see if the rubber pads seem too worn for 40k miles.


-juice
#54 of 2018
jmazda by barich1
Mar 02, 2000 (9:40 pm)
Reply
It should be reliable. The '89 that I had was in the same redesign (That one ran from '88 to '92). It went to 212k miles with NO PROBLEMS except for 2 major (about $1,000 each) automatic transmission rebuilds. If the one you are considering is an auto, make sure that the reverse gear works and the transmission doesn't slip in the forward gears. If you buy it, I have read that frequent A/T fluid changes (evey 10k miles or so) do wonders for the life of it. (It may last the life of the car with them) Great car.
#55 of 2018
Malibu brake and tail light problem by larry886
Mar 05, 2000 (3:32 am)
Reply
Anybody else have this problem, the tail lights tend to melt the plastic next to the conductor on the bulb itself. The bulb # is 3057LL "Sylvania"
I beleive the tail light fixture is the problem, not the bulb. I have a Lumina that has the same bulb and no problems and the Malibu has melted the plastic on both sides, left and right tail lights. I have noticed a few Malibu's on the highway with brake lights and turn signals not working. You can fix by scraping melted plastic off the bulb and cleaning the conductor but what a P.I.A. ANYONE ELSE HAVE SAME PROBLEM??
#56 of 2018
Doubleought 626 LX 5spd by skibry1
Mar 05, 2000 (1:23 pm)
Reply
700 miles and what a babe.At 6ft I loose a sight
line from that rear-view mirror not being mounted
in the darkened portion of the windshield.It took
about an hour and 2 single-edge razor blades to
whittle away at that mirror button glue but it's
raised now and out of my sight line.That flippin'
black trim piece is another story!What the heck
is that made from?It's inpervious to blades,heat
and acetone!Help me! For a head-rest restraint to
be effective it needs to be elevated to at least
the top of one's ear.Mine is about 2.5" to low,
the head-rest not my ear,and should be modified.
 Will get back later. Thumbs Up
#57 of 2018
. by ateixeira
Mar 06, 2000 (2:36 pm)
Reply
Never had trouble with the lights on our 626, but why ask about a Malibu in a 626 topic?


-juice
#58 of 2018
Doubleought 626 LX 5spd by jgard1
Mar 06, 2000 (3:07 pm)
Reply
The head restraint thing goes back a while, IIRC it was only an issue on the ES model of previous years, and well documented in the Lemon Aid book. It was something I checked out on the '97 ES I bought last year. At 5'10" the head restraint is for me perhaps a tad too low at its fully extended position. For someone 6+ feet it could be downright dangerous in the event of a rear ender. I'm surprised that not only has mazda NOT done anything about it, but now it seems that more than just one model has the problem.
#59 of 2018
barich1 by skorol
Mar 07, 2000 (12:33 am)
Reply
I also used to have 1989 Mazda 626, but with 5-spd, and it was a great car. I loved the 2.2L engine, it was so smooth and powerful. I didn't have many problems with that car, only minor ones, and have a lot of good words to say about it. By the way, Mazda I thoguht started making that disign in 1989, and not 1988, as you said in your posts. That engine, however, consumed oil, and I had to put half a quart in every 2 weeks or so, did you experience the same fenomena? Despite that, I never had problems with engine, and considered it to be the best part of the car even with that small oil consumption. Mazda has always been making great cars, especially with manual transmissions.
#60 of 2018
. by barich1
Mar 07, 2000 (2:40 am)
Reply
Yeah, it did use oil, but not that much. I know a few people with supposed '88s that look like mine, but when I bought it they had some '88s left over on the lot that were clearly an older body style. On MSN CarPoint it says '88-'92. I really am not quite sure. In retrospect I wish I had gotten the 5 spd.

Messages Page 6 of 202
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
202
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement