High End Luxury Cars

24700 messages, Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 12:24 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Audi A8, BMW 7 Series, Jaguar XJ-Series, Lexus LS 460, Mercedes-Benz S-Class, Volkswagen Phaeton, Maserati Quattroporte, Mercedes-Benz CL-Class, Sedan

Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.

A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.

Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.

Outline

Messages Page 781 of 2471: 1; ...; 778; 779; 780; 781; 782; 783; 784; ...; 2471; Prev; Next; Last

#7794 of 24700 Re: The hard question... [rl81] by denaliinpa Feb 19, 2005 (9:29 pm)
Replying to: rl81 (Feb 19, 2005 8:06 pm) sure...Accords or Camry's are fine automobiles. i had a Camry and 2 Accords. since i love cars i eventually moved into more technically interesting automobiles. not out of peer pressure or anything else.... i just love cars. all of the technology in automobiles today is amazing. when i was shopping this past time for a new car i looked at tons of cars. some expensive ..some not so expensive. i couldn't give a flying sh!t what my neighbors think of me. cars are my favorite hobby. after all of these posts .....i hope nobody thought it was golf!
#7795 of 24700 response to Hard Question by sv7887 Feb 20, 2005 (6:27 am)
Hi All, I think there are a few types of buyers out there: 1) The real car nuts..They love everything related to their Marque.. Their cars strike an emotional chord in them. They love the look and feel of their car as well as the heritage of the brand. 2) Those who base their purchases on what JDP, CR, and other objective surveys say.."Feel" and looks are not as important to these buyers. You could say they simply want a nice car that will last. I'd probably fit into this group. 3) The "Me Too's" who simply want the snob appeal that comes with owning their cars. It's probably likely that they know nothing about the marque or car at all. I think this is what happened to the 3 Series. (which is sad because it's one of best cars out there) I can't tell you how many people I've seen do just that. What do you all think? SV
#7796 of 24700 Topic by pat HOST Feb 20, 2005 (7:18 am)
Let's remember that we are actually discussing the higher end makers here and luxury cars in general. Generalizing about the folks who purchase them isn't the subject, and it's dangerous territory. Why people buy luxury cars isn't the issue here - we're talking about the cars they do buy and the companies who make them. Again, let's stick to the cars. Thanks.
#7798 of 24700 Re: reversing the spin [denaliinpa] by brightness04 Feb 20, 2005 (9:34 am)
Replying to: denaliinpa (Feb 19, 2005 7:31 am) It's funny how you accused bais when I provided a link that listed a table of hard data comparing aluminum vs. steel tensile strength, then cite a link that has no hard data at all just promotional fluff . . . "talking to you is like a martian trying to have a discussion with a fungo"{Bull Durham). Do you dispute those tensile strength data are inccorrect? or you just have no clue what tensile strength is. only the Audi has taken it to the advanced technical level of a completely all aluminum vehicle. whether you like Audi or not what they accomplished is very advanced. Or simply part of a technical trial and error process like BMW's i-Drive. In any case, Aluminum-intensive construction (not all-aluminum, btw) only accounts for 3% of total Audis sold in 2004. That hardly defines the marquee as you stated.
#7799 of 24700 Re: A8 vs. LS [rl81] by michael_mattox Feb 20, 2005 (9:38 am)
Replying to: rl81 (Feb 19, 2005 5:17 pm) It seems to me that a CAR has no experience at all it is what it is...If it is faster and corners as well and has equal or better acceleration...and what ever it takes to beat the other car...It's esperience means little. We have been discussin Audi and LS..So I have limited my comments to those two cars. The frame of the LS is very solid..Mine is an 01 and is just as solid as it was when I bought it..Many here with LS 400s will say the same about their cars that are as much as 10 or 12 years old.
#7800 of 24700 Re: Lexus...brand vs reality [rl81] by brightness04 Feb 20, 2005 (9:41 am)
Replying to: rl81 (Feb 19, 2005 9:33 am) I can tell you that much: the alloy spaceframe is considerably harder to manufacture. It takes a lot more people to put together a spaceframe than a convantional frame, which is manufactured mostly by robots. All the more reason to stay away from aluminum spaceframe: product non-uniformity. Do I really want my family exposed to extra risk because some schmuck had a bad day and did not weld a particular point up to spec? It's not like they can crash test every individual car before selling Replies to this message: rl81 (Feb 20, 2005 11:08 am)
#7801 of 24700 Re: 0-60 times [denaliinpa] by brightness04 Feb 20, 2005 (9:50 am)
Replying to: denaliinpa (Feb 19, 2005 11:49 am) keep in mind that the A8 in either long or short wheelbase is AWD and I'm sure that will affect the quickness of the vehicle. For the same engine and same vehicle weight, AWD should be slightly quicker, especially for cars that have enough power to spin rear wheels. as for which automobile is safer i am sure they are both equally safe in accidents regardless of the steel vs aluminum nonsense that has been filling this thread. How can you be sure?? Based on what?? There are all sorts of accidents, most of which do not involve composite barriers and most are not at 40mph. They may both score similarly in crash tests; there is much more to safety than crash tests. One thing we do know for sure is that, in a fender bender, aluminum bodies are much much more expensive to repair. Another set of facts that we do know for sure is that: aluminum has lower melting and flaming points, so in case of severe accidents with fire . . .; no simiulated standard crash tests ever involve fire. Tensile strength difference is another fact we do know for sure. Replies to this message: denaliinpa (Feb 20, 2005 4:54 pm) michael_mattox (Feb 20, 2005 7:37 pm) denaliinpa (Feb 20, 2005 7:49 pm) and 2 more...
#7802 of 24700 Re: Lexus...brand vs reality [brightness04] by rl81 Feb 20, 2005 (11:08 am)
Replying to: brightness04 (Feb 20, 2005 9:41 am) Do I really want my family exposed to extra risk because some schmuck had a bad day and did not weld a particular point up to spec? Like that can't happen with any car. Of course Lexus would N E V E R make a mistake, since they are perfect, right? If you want to give me the robot excuse, there is still a possibility for errors.
#7803 of 24700 Response to rl81 by michael_mattox Feb 20, 2005 (11:14 am)
rl81: You can never say never, not even Lexus is perfect, but they are closer to perfect then the Germans,it is therefore much LESS likely that Lexus would make a mistake then the German Manfactures would. Replies to this message: rl81 (Feb 20, 2005 11:30 am) michael_mattox (Feb 20, 2005 4:45 pm) denaliinpa (Feb 20, 2005 5:02 pm) and 2 more...