Sign In Join 



High End Luxury Cars

24700 messages,  Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 12:24 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Audi A8, BMW 7 Series, Jaguar XJ-Series, Lexus LS 460, Mercedes-Benz S-Class, Volkswagen Phaeton, Maserati Quattroporte, Mercedes-Benz CL-Class, Sedan



Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.

A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.

Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.



Messages Page 780 of 2471
1
...
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
...
2471
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#7782 of 24700
Re: Lexus...brand vs reality [michael_mattox] by rl81
Feb 19, 2005 (9:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: michael_mattox (Feb 17, 2005 8:27 pm)

"Audi A-8 336 HP...O-60 6.3 sec..No bad for a big car."
"Lexus LS430 290 HP...0-60... 5.9 SEC...and it gets much better gas milage."
 
Why don't you tell the whole truth?
Where does the A8 reach its peak HP? at 6500rpm!
Where does the LS reach its peak HP? at 5600rpm!
Torque? about the same: 317 A8 vs. 320 LS
Is (18/25 LS vs. 18/24 A8) that so much better???
 
The Audi weighs about 300 lb. more (8%)
 
Now, the discussion between alu space frame and conventional steel is very interesting. I have seen the difference between the two in the production. I can tell you that much: the alloy spaceframe is considerably harder to manufacture. It takes a lot more people to put together a spaceframe than a convantional frame, which is manufactured mostly by robots. Audi has a considerable experience in alu frames, since they are the first who did that in large scale production, as far as I know. The new Rolls-Royce is an aluminum space frame, for example.
#7783 of 24700
Re: Lexus...brand vs reality [rl81] by michael_mattox
Feb 19, 2005 (10:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: rl81 (Feb 19, 2005 9:33 am)

RL81:
 
I am not a real knowledge Auto guy...Don't know how to fix them...or build them..Only know how to buy them...Question..
 
If the Lexus has Almost 16% Less HP...and slightly more toque..AND IS MUCH FASTER 0-60
 
What is the relavance of the LS reaching Peak HP at a lower RPM...ISN'T THAT A GOOD THING.
#7784 of 24700
More on Construction by sv7887
Feb 19, 2005 (10:46 am)
Reply
Hi All,
  Does a welded body have any disadvantage over the uniframe design a la Mercedes? If you were going to get into an accident, is there anything conclusive on the merits of either design?
 
SV
#7785 of 24700
0-60 times by denaliinpa
Feb 19, 2005 (11:49 am)
Reply
hey guys,
 
when it comes to which automobile is quicker the A8 or the LS430....the LS is quicker. i have yet to see a 0-60 time for the short wheel base
version of the A8. the 6.3 is usually what i see quoted for the long wheelbase. keep in mind that the A8 in either long or short wheelbase is AWD and I'm sure that will affect the quickness of the vehicle. as for which automobile is safer i am sure they are both equally safe in accidents regardless of the steel vs aluminum nonsense that has been filling this thread.
 
having said that Audi should be commended for manufacturing a unique vehicle.
#7786 of 24700
Re: Lexus vs Audi [michael_mattox] by rl81
Feb 19, 2005 (2:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: michael_mattox (Feb 19, 2005 10:27 am)

michael_mattox:
 
the two cars/ engines have totally different characters.
LS: comfortable and refined
A8: sporty and dynamic
 
Compare it to the M5/M6 engine: V10, 5liters, 507 HP7750rpm, 383 ft-lbs6100rpm
 
The A8 short and long wheelbase are supposed to be the same from 0-60 (6.3s), based on the audiusa website. Either that is a little too optimistic for the long wheelbase or too slow for the short wheelbase. Alright, after reviewing the German Audi website, I found out that the A8 SWB goes from 1-100kph in 6.3s and the LWB takes 6.4s. Because 0-100kph equals 0-62mph, in order to be fair, you have to take off 0.1 or 0.2 seconds off to get the 'real' 0-60 time. Also, don't forget that the A8 is AWD which will slow it down in pure acceleration compared to the LS. However AWD gives you better traction at the limit.
 
What does that mean? If you ask me? NOTHING. How many luxury car owners in here take their car regularly on the track? How many have driven their LS or whatever on a track? There is nothing to prove it, my opinion is that the A8 will be faster driven at the limit. And I don't mean pure acceleration. Speed in curves is more important on a track.
 
Really people, the way most people drive these cars, they only get the cars to 60-70% of their potential. It's more about knowing that you could if you wanted.
#7787 of 24700
Re: More on Construction [sv7887] by rl81
Feb 19, 2005 (2:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sv7887 (Feb 19, 2005 10:46 am)

The welded construction gets its strength through multiple sheets of metal. You have to imagine it's like an onion, where you have multiple layers that give the final strength. In the beginning that whole construction flaps like it's made out of paper. When it's finished it's very very solid.
The uniframe design on the other hand is more like a skeleton. Conceptually it should be stiffer.
 
What does this mean in an accident?
Well it depends, the key here is that in an accident you have to bend as much metal as possible to take out the energy of the crash without hurting the people that are inside. Weight is also another consideration because the heavier car will be less damaged in an accident. Safety is a very hard thing to do right because it's not JUST that they try to make to frame as hard as they can. You want to absorb most of the energy in the front where the engine is (in a frontal crash).
Conclusion: safety depends more on how good of a job the engineers have done rather than how stiff the frame is. I personally don't believe that there are cosiderable differences between any serious lux car.
Don't forget, the stiffer the frame the sportier, therefore I assume that Lexus would be more on the soft side since they are more on comfort than sport.
#7788 of 24700
Re: Lexus vs Audi [rl81] by michael_mattox
Feb 19, 2005 (3:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: rl81 (Feb 19, 2005 2:21 pm)

rl81
 
when you look at the numbers...The LS is both comfortable and refined and Sporty and Dynamic...
 
How else do you explain both the faster 0-60 time and the slightly stronger gear ratio?? in the LS..As far as faster on the Road...Well you made a GUESS...But we don't have to guess about which is actually faster....
 
PS. Because of the Audi's greater Turning Radius and great weight I would GUESS it is not faster on the Road either. BUT, that is just MY guess.
 
Do Dynamic Sporty Cars generally have 4wd, how about Race cars? just curious...I do believe the Hot little Subury does have AWD ...Maybe Audi is in that catagory..Just isn't as fast.
#7789 of 24700
A8 vs. LS by rl81
Feb 19, 2005 (5:17 pm)
Reply
I tried to find some racetrack times for both of them but, like I said it's not like people race those things. We're just left with guesses.
 
All new Subarus are AWD...
You probably refered to the WRX, which is the street legal version of the worldcup rallye car. The WRX has about 300 hp and is very light. Sure it's fast. Same with the Mitsubishi Lancer Evo, a Euro version of the Ford Focus...
 
Other race/sport cars with AWD:
1. Porsche 911 Turbo
2. Lamborgini Murcielago
3. Lamborgini Gallardo (built by Audi)
4. Audi Le Mans (the new super sport check it out at the Future Vehicles seciton)
5. Nissan Skyline (but this is not a 'real' super sport)
6. we might also add the one and only Audi Coupe Quattro
...I can't think of any more, right now...
 
Back in the early 80's Audi racecars dominated in rallye and touring cars...they were the first ones to do that. My point is that Audi has extensive race experience. I don't want to say that Toyota doesn't have any race, but not as much as Audi...
#7790 of 24700
World Car of the year? by rl81
Feb 19, 2005 (5:41 pm)
Reply
Lexus? NO
Acura? NO
Infinity? NO
 
See the answer here:
http://www.carpages.co.uk/audi/audi-a6-18-02-05.asp?switched=on&e- cho=154506977
#7791 of 24700
Audi by sv7887
Feb 19, 2005 (6:02 pm)
Reply
Hi rl81,
  You make a good point about Audi. But is AWD really needed on a Luxo-Cruiser that is likely going back and forth to the office? I'd definitely see the benefit on the S8 though. Like you said, it's not like anyone is racing these cars. I looked at your link and found something interesting:
 
"They rated the 36 candidates based both on objective criteria, such as product characteristics, and on their emotional charisma: the "wow" factor is clearly just as important an evaluation criteria as safety & environment or value for money."
 
I think this perfectly illustrates the difference between Lexus and German marque owners and maybe even US and European buyers..We discount the "wow" factor in favor of the objectives. This is not meant to diminish the Audi in anyway. I feel each brand has its' own personality cult. If you were to take an unscientific survey on this board you'd come to the same conclusion. Perhaps this is why Europe has always been hesitant towards Japanese cars. I think it's really the cultural difference.
 
SV

Messages Page 780 of 2471
1
...
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
...
2471
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement