High End Luxury Cars

24685 messages, Last post on Nov 02, 2009 at 4:40 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Audi A8, BMW 7 Series, Jaguar XJ-Series, Lexus LS 460, Mercedes-Benz S-Class, Volkswagen Phaeton, Maserati Quattroporte, Mercedes-Benz CL-Class, Sedan

Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.

A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.

Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.

Outline

Messages Page 778 of 2469: 1; ...; 775; 776; 777; 778; 779; 780; 781; ...; 2469; Prev; Next; Last

#7770 of 24685 The new Chrysler 300 by xkss Feb 19, 2005 (4:45 am)
has substance that the Crossfire lacks. The 300C is the 300 to get while the 300C SRT-8 is awesome. Information and pictures of the 300C SRT-8: http://seriouswheels.com/top-2005-Chrysler-300C-SRT-8.htm Information on the Chrysler/Dodge LX cars (the big rwd cars): http://www.allpar.com/cars/lx/index.html The Magnum is perhaps the first cool American station wagon that has sold very well (55-57 Chevy Nomad didn't sell well). Replies to this message: brightness04 (Feb 19, 2005 6:41 am)
#7771 of 24685 New Chrylser 300 is NOT a Bentley rip-off by xkss Feb 19, 2005 (4:50 am)
Here is the 1998 Chrysler Chronos concept car: http://conceptcars.free.fr/images/Chronos_image1.jpg http://www.allpar.com/cars/concepts/chronos.html 2005 Chrysler 300C SRT-8: http://fast-autos.net/chrysler/srt8.jpg http://www.allpar.com/cars/lx/srt8-chrysler.html Now the 1957 Chrysler 300C: http://www.allpar.com/cars/chrysler-300c.html The grilles of both Chryslers (57 and 05) look similar. Notice the lines in the middle of the 57 and 05 Chrysler's hoods. Also notice the rectangular taillights of both cars. The front end styling of the new Chrysler 300 is almost IDENTICAL to the front end styling of the 1998 Chrysler Chronos concept except for the slant of the new one. The Bentley Arnage... "Named for one of the most challenging corners on the Le Mans racing circuit, the Arnage was fittingly introduced at the French circuit in April of 1998." from autos.msn.com
#7772 of 24685 My pick for a new luxury car: The aluminum Jaguar XJR by xkss Feb 19, 2005 (4:57 am)
I'd like a new aluminum Jaguar XJ8. The new XJR's aluminum chassis is 60 % stiffer than its predecessor and 40 per cent lighter than that of an equivalent steel body. http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/jk/images/04jagxjbody.jpg http://www.jagweb.com/aj6eng/v8_performance.html (the new aluminum XJR has a 4.2 V-8) p.s. The 2005 Jaguar Super V8 is the flagship XJ and it weighs over 800 pounds less than the BMW 760Li.
#7773 of 24685 Re: Sales volume [brightness04] by denaliinpa Feb 19, 2005 (6:37 am)
Replying to: brightness04 (Feb 19, 2005 3:07 am) complete nonsense and spin. Replies to this message: brightness04 (Feb 19, 2005 6:46 am)
#7774 of 24685 Re: The new Chrysler 300 [xkss] by brightness04 Feb 19, 2005 (6:41 am)
Replying to: xkss (Feb 19, 2005 4:45 am) Almost any daring retro design can be popular for a few months (or even longer, witness the New Beetle craze a few years ago). Ultimately however, it's the internals that matters. Crossfire was very sought after (Chrysler's first sold-at-MSRP car for nearly a decade), but now has months of supply queued up in the supply chain. "Cool" is in the eyes of behold. Magnum sales can not compare to Taurus wagon in its hey days, nor Focus wagon today.
#7775 of 24685 Re: Sales volume [denaliinpa] by brightness04 Feb 19, 2005 (6:46 am)
Replying to: denaliinpa (Feb 19, 2005 6:37 am) complete nonsense and spin. That's certainly a very intelligent rebuttal. I will take it as you are unable to make any counter-argument to the points I made. Namely: (1) Lexus has higher significantly higher price of admission than MB does, even in the US (the difference is far greater in Europe) (2) Lexus average selling price is higher than that of MB, in the US and worldwide. What does that say about which is the higher end luxury marquee?? (3) Halo cars sold in relatively small numbers compared to the rest of the lineup do not make a high end maruqee.
#7776 of 24685 Re: brightness04 [brightness04] by syswei Feb 19, 2005 (6:50 am)
Replying to: brightness04 (Feb 19, 2005 2:50 am) "industrial insiders at the site referenced above concur; if you follow the link for a few pages you will actually see an in-depth analysis of the 2002 Audi A8 Space Frame Aluminum Intensive structure and its disadvantages" Errrr...American engineers don't know what they're talking about. Only German engineers do. Don't you know that? hehehe.
#7777 of 24685 Re: brightness04 [brightness04] by denaliinpa Feb 19, 2005 (6:58 am)
Replying to: brightness04 (Feb 19, 2005 2:50 am) more nonsense and spin.... you post a link to US Steel!!! now there is an unbiased promotion!!!! is this the best you could do? i read all of it. and guess what....they complain that the last version A8 is heavier than the "steel" LS430!!duh...it has AWD? did it ever occur to you that any weight savings made by using aluminum afford an automaker the ability to ad more equipment that other wise might make the automobile too heavy? even after reading all of the article which is clearly biased....the A8 is obviously one of the most advanced automobile designs in the world. what a joke!! tell you what...i will go to ALCOA.... find an article about "how aluminum is better than steel" and post a link. don't you think it might be a bit biased? duh!!! both steel and aluminum manufacturers are fighting neck and neck to supply the auto industry. i read an article in USA today about a year ago that was quite interesting. i will try to find it. hopefully it will have less spin and sales pitch. Replies to this message: brightness04 (Feb 19, 2005 7:08 am)
#7778 of 24685 Re: brightness04 [denaliinpa] by brightness04 Feb 19, 2005 (7:08 am)
Replying to: denaliinpa (Feb 19, 2005 6:58 am) did it ever occur to you that any weight savings made by using aluminum afford an automaker the ability to ad more equipment that other wise might make the automobile too heavy? Or trying to make up for inadequate engineering. the A8 is obviously one of the most advanced automobile designs in the world. what a joke!! The joke is on you. Obviously, each one of LS, 7, S and A8 is "one of the most advanced automobile designs in th world." Dah! You'd think after spending that much money it ought to be. Biased or not, the steel side certainly has the material expertise and have a long list of disadvantages for aluminum. As far as I can tell, the only counter-argument the aluminum side expert witness can provide is weight savings, which in the case of A8 is quite removed from the spirit of the vehicle. More to the point, A8 only makes up 3% of Audi sales. How can you argue that differentiates Audi from VW? "Nonsens and spin"?
#7779 of 24685 reversing the spin by denaliinpa Feb 19, 2005 (7:31 am)
http://www.autoaluminum.org/sp1.htm here is a link to an article from Reuters about aluminum in automobiles. it is on a biased site that promotes aluminum but the article is interesting. there is also a sub article that discusses the previous generation A8....how it received 5 stars in crash tests. for any person to believe that an ALL ALUMINUM A8 is not different than a an ALL STEEL Phaeton...."talking to you is like a martian trying to have a discussion with a fungo"{Bull Durham). many auto manufacturers are using aluminum today to save weight in their vehicles. the current E class has an aluminum hood, trunk and i believe front fenders. only the Audi has taken it to the advanced technical level of a completely all aluminum vehicle. whether you like Audi or not what they accomplished is very advanced. Replies to this message: brightness04 (Feb 20, 2005 9:34 am)