Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans High End Luxury Cars
24696 messages, Last post on Nov 28, 2009 at 10:43 AM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.
A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.
Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: sv7887 (Feb 18, 2005 2:58 pm)  Even at $400k per vehicle, it takes 10k vehicles to break even (assuming the car manufacturing itself cost negligible amount of money . Either that or trim the engineering budget and let cars leave the factory with myriads of bugs due to a shoe-string engineering budget. One way to increase unit sales for a niche vehicle is prolonging the product cycle, but then the mfr ends up having an obsolete product line. MB seems to be trying some marketting trick with the Chrysler purchase: using the latter as some sort of life cycle extension program for obsolete MB platforms, so more unit sales can be generated. Exterior design is cheap, getting everything working together well inside takes real engineering budget, so it is a cheap trick to extend a platform's shelf life; every brand does that sort of thing with mid-cycle refreshes, but MB is trying to double the shelf life by giving Chrysler hand-me-downs. I wonder how quickly people are going to realize those hand-me-down "MB technology" on re-skinned Chryslers are little more than twice warmed left-overs. I will give it perhaps one year, before 300C piling up in the supply channel to multi-month proportions just like Crossfire has. |
|
|
has substance that the Crossfire lacks. The 300C is the 300 to get while the 300C SRT-8 is awesome. Information and pictures of the 300C SRT-8: http://seriouswheels.com/top-2005-Chrysler-300C-SRT-8.htm Information on the Chrysler/Dodge LX cars (the big rwd cars): http://www.allpar.com/cars/lx/index.html The Magnum is perhaps the first cool American station wagon that has sold very well (55-57 Chevy Nomad didn't sell well).
|
|
|
Here is the 1998 Chrysler Chronos concept car: http://conceptcars.free.fr/images/Chronos_image1.jpg http://www.allpar.com/cars/concepts/chronos.html 2005 Chrysler 300C SRT-8: http://fast-autos.net/chrysler/srt8.jpg http://www.allpar.com/cars/lx/srt8-chrysler.html Now the 1957 Chrysler 300C: http://www.allpar.com/cars/chrysler-300c.html The grilles of both Chryslers (57 and 05) look similar. Notice the lines in the middle of the 57 and 05 Chrysler's hoods. Also notice the rectangular taillights of both cars. The front end styling of the new Chrysler 300 is almost IDENTICAL to the front end styling of the 1998 Chrysler Chronos concept except for the slant of the new one. The Bentley Arnage... "Named for one of the most challenging corners on the Le Mans racing circuit, the Arnage was fittingly introduced at the French circuit in April of 1998." from autos.msn.com |
|
|
I'd like a new aluminum Jaguar XJ8. The new XJR's aluminum chassis is 60 % stiffer than its predecessor and 40 per cent lighter than that of an equivalent steel body. http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/jk/images/04jagxjbody.jpg http://www.jagweb.com/aj6eng/v8_performance.html (the new aluminum XJR has a 4.2 V-8) p.s. The 2005 Jaguar Super V8 is the flagship XJ and it weighs over 800 pounds less than the BMW 760Li. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: brightness04 (Feb 19, 2005 3:07 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: xkss (Feb 19, 2005 4:45 am) "Cool" is in the eyes of behold. Magnum sales can not compare to Taurus wagon in its hey days, nor Focus wagon today. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: denaliinpa (Feb 19, 2005 6:37 am) That's certainly a very intelligent rebuttal. I will take it as you are unable to make any counter-argument to the points I made. Namely: (1) Lexus has higher significantly higher price of admission than MB does, even in the US (the difference is far greater in Europe) (2) Lexus average selling price is higher than that of MB, in the US and worldwide. What does that say about which is the higher end luxury marquee?? (3) Halo cars sold in relatively small numbers compared to the rest of the lineup do not make a high end maruqee. |
|
|
Replying to: brightness04 (Feb 19, 2005 2:50 am) Errrr...American engineers don't know what they're talking about. Only German engineers do. Don't you know that? hehehe. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: brightness04 (Feb 19, 2005 2:50 am) you post a link to US Steel!!! now there is an unbiased promotion!!!! is this the best you could do? i read all of it. and guess what....they complain that the last version A8 is heavier than the "steel" LS430!!duh...it has AWD? did it ever occur to you that any weight savings made by using aluminum afford an automaker the ability to ad more equipment that other wise might make the automobile too heavy? even after reading all of the article which is clearly biased....the A8 is obviously one of the most advanced automobile designs in the world. what a joke!! tell you what...i will go to ALCOA.... find an article about "how aluminum is better than steel" and post a link. don't you think it might be a bit biased? duh!!! both steel and aluminum manufacturers are fighting neck and neck to supply the auto industry. i read an article in USA today about a year ago that was quite interesting. i will try to find it. hopefully it will have less spin and sales pitch.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: denaliinpa (Feb 19, 2005 6:58 am) Or trying to make up for inadequate engineering. the A8 is obviously one of the most advanced automobile designs in the world. what a joke!! The joke is on you. Obviously, each one of LS, 7, S and A8 is "one of the most advanced automobile designs in th world." Dah! You'd think after spending that much money it ought to be. Biased or not, the steel side certainly has the material expertise and have a long list of disadvantages for aluminum. As far as I can tell, the only counter-argument the aluminum side expert witness can provide is weight savings, which in the case of A8 is quite removed from the spirit of the vehicle. More to the point, A8 only makes up 3% of Audi sales. How can you argue that differentiates Audi from VW? "Nonsens and spin"? |
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Audi A8
2010 BMW 7 Series
2008 Jaguar XJ-Series
2010 Lexus LS 460
2010 Mercedes-Benz S-Class
2006 Volkswagen Phaeton
2009 Maserati Quattroporte
2010 Mercedes-Benz CL-Class
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
