Sign In Join 



High End Luxury Cars

24700 messages,  Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 12:24 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Audi A8, BMW 7 Series, Jaguar XJ-Series, Lexus LS 460, Mercedes-Benz S-Class, Volkswagen Phaeton, Maserati Quattroporte, Mercedes-Benz CL-Class, Sedan



Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.

A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.

Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.



Messages Page 2349 of 2471
1
...
2346
2347
2348
2349
2350
2351
2352
...
2471
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#23475 of 24700
Re: Interiors [tagman] by merc1
Jan 30, 2007 (10:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tagman (Jan 30, 2007 9:07 pm)

It doesn't look like it there, but the Range Rover easily has the best interior of any luxury SUV on the market. Some of their interior options are just way too luxurious. Constrasting piping and what not, miles ahead of anything from the usual suspect's SUVs here.
 
M
#23476 of 24700
Re: Acura [syswei] by merc1
Jan 30, 2007 (10:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: syswei (Jan 30, 2007 2:30 pm)

Simply put it should have been kept HELM, for marques. There was no need to change the title of this thread since it wasn't model or make specific.
 
M
#23477 of 24700
Re: Interiors [tagman] by lexusguy
Jan 30, 2007 (11:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tagman (Jan 30, 2007 9:07 pm)

Actually, I think M-B's best work is the CL600. Its stunning on the inside, it looks like a more expensive car than it is, the exact opposite of the last CL V12.
 

 
#23478 of 24700
I'm sick of this interior decorator bickering! by drfill
Jan 30, 2007 (11:07 pm)
Reply
Apparently, no one make a top-notch interior!
 
   The BMW is universally panned, and the S-Class apes that.
 
   The Camry has been passed styling cues from the LS, so now the LS is no good.
 
   I guess because the Maybach and Benz are sharing an interior, neither of them are any good.
 
   I'm still not sure why Acura is in this forum.
 
   When you try to reinvent the wheel, you will screw it up (ask BMW).
 
   Many vehicles share parts, styling cues, and layout with lower-priced cars. I can look at 3 different Mercedes front ends and not know what car I'm looking at.
 
   Porsche only has one interior from what I can tell.
 
   Everyone lives in a glass house on this one.
 
   The only maker who still can't make an interior livable is BMW. And I don't think they care!
 
   DrFill
#23479 of 24700
Re: Interiors [lexusguy] by merc1
Jan 30, 2007 (11:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lexusguy (Jan 30, 2007 11:00 pm)

I knew when the SLK and CLS arrived that Mercedes had learned their lesson about interiors. The S and CL just gave them the chance to really pour it on thick.
 
Too bad the folks in Bama at MBUSI still aren't on the same page. Better than the first generation ML for sure, but the R/GL/ML still aren't cut from the same German cloth.
 
M
#23480 of 24700
Re: Topic [merc1] by pat HOST
Jan 31, 2007 (4:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: merc1 (Jan 30, 2007 10:54 pm)

Feel free to email Sylvia and discuss it with her. But let's please stop kicking this back and forth in here.
#23481 of 24700
Re: LG, RX 300-350 [merc1] by houdini1
Jan 31, 2007 (8:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: merc1 (Jan 30, 2007 10:20 pm)

Sorry, wrong again. Your silly argument on starting prices of the GL should be with Edmunds, not me. The 320 CDI starts at $52,400. and the GL 450 starts at $54,900. Keep trying and you will get it right eventually.
#23482 of 24700
Re: LG, RX 300-350 [houdini1] by merc1
Jan 31, 2007 (9:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: houdini1 (Jan 31, 2007 8:45 am)

Guy, do you know what a destination charge is? Try adding it and then posting. Eventually you'll get it right. If anyone is being silly it is you by hiding behind a price difference of 5K or so to disqualify a vehicle that you know full well is a competitor to the LX470. Then not being able to actually read a price in the first place. Now thats silly.
 
I'm still waiting on a valid reason as to why the Range Rover doesn't stomp the ancient LX470?
 
You're the one using their prices so the problem lies with you and this fuzzy math. First the GL had a price in the 40K, now you're not able to get the actual sticker price right. You'll not find a GL anywhere for the prices you listed.
 
M
#23483 of 24700
Re: LG, RX 300-350 [merc1] by houdini1
Jan 31, 2007 (10:18 am)
Reply

Replying to: merc1 (Jan 31, 2007 9:09 am)

Sigh.....nobody includes the destination charges in MSRP. Just like the taxes you have to pay or doc fees or whatever are not incl. in MSRP. You might as well also include the cost of your first years gasoline in the MSRP as well. Maybe you can hit the magic $60,000. number yet.
 
I'm not saying the Range Rover is not a good vehicle. I'm just saying I prefer the LX 470. That is why I own one. Since you own neither, just what is your beef?
#23484 of 24700
houdini1 and merc1 by pat HOST
Jan 31, 2007 (11:14 am)
Reply
It's time to agree to disagree and move on.

Messages Page 2349 of 2471
1
...
2346
2347
2348
2349
2350
2351
2352
...
2471
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement