Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans High End Luxury Cars
24700 messages, Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 12:24 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.
A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.
Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.
|
Replying to: hpowders (Dec 26, 2006 5:21 am) Well not if they're already on the market, which in fairness the Audi, BMW, Mercedes, and Jaguar all have been for some time now. I'd read in one of these C&D comparos in which Lexus asked for the comparo. I believe it was the first comparo of the original LS400 back in 1989-1990 and that car was a pre-production prototype also. It won. What I don't get is why Lexus would supply a car that was defective in the first place since they're known for such detail and quality. I dunno, maybe the brakes and door seals failed after C&D thrashed the car. Pre-product status though has nothing to do with the trunk space and handling though so it isn't like it would have won if it were a production model. M |
|
|
Replying to: houdini1 (Dec 26, 2006 5:39 am) Poor analogy because you use your computer everyday. You don't use airbags but maybe once or twice in your life, never preferably. Problem is that you don't know how an airbag works and you seem to think that because an insurance company says a car has been totalled that airbags should have gone off. You couldn't be more oblivious to the facts if you wanted too. Its amazes me how one can say they don't know how something works and then say it is defective. Yep your opinion, but it isn't based on anything other than a silly bias. There isn't a fact within a 1000 miles of your "opinion". M |
|
|
Replying to: cyclone4 (Dec 26, 2006 5:44 am) They should have been though, at least enough to check the car out and made sure it was truly represenative of what customers would be getting. If you notice these comparos seem to come around at C&D when a new or refreshed LS hits the scene. M |
|
|
Replying to: reality2 (Dec 26, 2006 12:47 pm) I raised this same point back in Dec of 2003 when this same comparo was done with all 2004 model year cars, except the S430 which was a 2003. C&D complained about the S430's 5-speed transmission, but they noted the 2004 model had the 7-speed (which is praised worldwide) and that would have made some difference, just like the case of the 2006 A8L in a feild of 2007 cars. I was told that the fact the S430 was a 2003 model didn't make a difference, it wouldn't have won anyway. I agree, it wouldn't have, but maybe it wouldn't have been last either. Fast foward to this comparo and now these minor details make all the difference in the world. The LS wasn't production, like a production model would have helped it go from the last to first. No conspiracies here. Applause. M |
|
|
Replying to: dewey (Dec 26, 2006 3:34 pm) That and the fact that MB has upped their payments to C&D. M |
|
|
Replying to: cyclone4 (Dec 26, 2006 4:16 pm) One thing though, we know the BMW is a handler and it placed ahead of the LS based on that, if you want to go with that, its ok by me. The S550 on the other hand didn't win out over the LS based on just handling like and others make it seem. The S does like I've said all along provide the same ride as the LS with better handling and that is what put it over. It isn't if you're being short changed on ride comfort or comfort in general with the S as you would in say the BMW for its superior handling. The fact that the LS didn't have a huge price advantage this time around probably hurt it too. It wasn't just a simple case of better handling by a long shot. M |
|
|
|
|
I don't see any "conspiracy" in C&Ds test. But one should look at other comparo's also as they come out. You can bet within under 6 months, Automobile, Motor Trend & Road & Track will do comparison tests of all of these cars also. The LS460 in C&Ds testing definately was flawed as both Motor Trend's and Road & Track's testing has shows similar braking, slalom, and skidpad numbers as it's competitors. C&D's Ls460 also performed poorly on the skidpad, yet for COTY testing the LS460 and S500 tested pretty evenly in braking, skidpad, and slalom. One must also look at the LS460 placing in last place and see just how good luxury cars and cars in general have gotten from just a few short years ago. It will be interesting to see what Infiniti throws out with the next Q45. Also, pricing played a big role in the LS's ranking, I think more than anything. I think if the same LS460 were priced in the $70K range instead of the as tested $93K MSRP it would have been number 2 or 3. It will take a while for it to sink in that a LS460 can now cost almost $100K. the Value card was one of the big reasons the LS always came out on top or near the top in comparo's. |
|
|
Replying to: cyclone4 (Dec 26, 2006 6:41 pm) You're telling me you're going to feel every crack and bump in the road driving a S550? If Gary is going overboard on brakes you seem to be doing the same here regarding (if you're talking about) the S550. The BMW? Yes it does have firmer ride as does the Audi, but the S550 rides better than either of them. I've read many times here from Lexus owners that if you can have it all why not. By that same token, a car that rides as good or better (Consumer reports on the previous S vs. the LS430) while handling better should be the obvious choice shouldn't it? That is if how a car ride and drives is so important. S-Class drivers have never been punished in the ride department. Never. I too of course think the brake issue was just a pre-production thing. Both MT and R&T have tested the SWB LS460 and got much better braking numbers. C&D drove pre-production LS460s twice, in their first drive report and in this comparo so.....they've never been able to get good braking numbers. M |
|
|
Replying to: dewey (Dec 26, 2006 7:37 pm) M
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: merc1 (Dec 27, 2006 3:51 am) Oh No, Toyota's gonna go bankrupt!
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Audi A8
2010 BMW 7 Series
2008 Jaguar XJ-Series
2010 Lexus LS 460
2010 Mercedes-Benz S-Class
2006 Volkswagen Phaeton
2009 Maserati Quattroporte
2010 Mercedes-Benz CL-Class
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
