You are here:
Forums
Sedans
High End Luxury Cars

24645 messages, Last post on Aug 26, 2008 at 4:40 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.
A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.
Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.
|
Replying to: lexusguy (Dec 25, 2006 11:11 pm) I think the pre-production status is what caused the long braking distances. Mind you all of this is for those who used to boast about how the LS400 and LS430 whipped the competition oh so many times in years past, not you. Some say C&D was looking for the sportiest car. That isn't true either otherwise the BMW or Audi would have won. They picked the car that was the best all arounder, IMO. We all know the Audi and BMW can be driven like sports cars, but the lack that ride that a lot of luxury car buyers like, especially the A8 (according to some magazines) The S is able to deliver that "ride" with better handling than the LS and that is what puts it over. Truth be told I actually like this LS more than even the 1993-1994 LS400 (my previous favorite LS). I like the interior shots making their rounds in all the mag advertisments and the car does indeed set a new standard for Lexus styling out on the road. I rode next to a white LS460L the other day, dare I say it was actually good looking for a Lexus. The pipes coming through the rear bumper is nice touch, but I take it Lexus has tested this to make sure they don't melt anything. Actually it was a LS460L, a Bentley Continental Flying Brick, a CLS550, S500, 3-Series, and me (CLK430) all sitting in 2 lanes waiting at a light. I live the wrong area. M
|
|
|
Replying to: merc1 (Dec 25, 2006 11:34 pm) Again, I appreciate your honest attempt to be fair. This is in stark contrast to some others (will not name names but you can well guess) on this board.
|
|
|
Replying to: merc1 (Dec 25, 2006 9:55 pm) No. It is more convenient for some to resort to name-calling as one recently did, calling me a "troll." When you don't like what you hear or don't have the intellectual capacity to respond, resort to name-calling. Nice. Folks, if you have nothing to debate, please ignore my posts. I consider myself way too
|
|
|
Replying to: cyclone4 (Dec 26, 2006 4:55 am) What difference does it make? Auto manufacturers send pre-production models for testing all the time. How else would the auto mags get their reviews off in a timely manner? Do you think the LS that won a previous C&D comparo wasn't a pre-production model? I didn't hear anyone at that time asking if it was a pre-production model that won. Do you think a manufacturer in its right mind would send a pre-production vehicle for testing that was significantly different in driveability than the production model? Face the truth. Let go of the state of denial. The new LS came in a dismal last in the comparo. If the average "Joe Blow" doesn't care about spending a fortune for mediocre brakes and steering, then that's his problem. The rest of us will continue to buy or lease MB, Audi and BMW. Also stop with the insinuations. You want to discuss cars, then do so. Please leave out that you will "not name names." This is a place to discuss cars. It is not the Spanish Inquisition.
|
|
|
Replying to: merc1 (Dec 25, 2006 9:45 pm) I certainly know WHEN an airbag should go off and when a $200K+ car is totalled in a front end collision the airbag should deploy. That is my opinion and I think it is very reasonable. Your attempted brow beating won't change it. Now get over it.
|
|
|
Replying to: hpowders (Dec 26, 2006 5:26 am) BTW, no I don't believe that the other vehicles tested were pre-production models. The S550 for example has been out for a long time. The LS460L testing was done on August 29. The official release of the LS was about 2 months later. I don't think that Lexus was overly concerned that it was a pre-production model. They knew that this car would be a huge hit no matter what the reviews said.
|
|
|
Replying to: cyclone4 (Dec 26, 2006 5:44 am) Well that's all well and good for Lexus corporate. Too bad that attitude hasn't filtered down to the Lexus faithful posters on these boards who are coming up with such creative excuses to wish away the last place finish in the C&D comparo.
|
|
|
we should be talking about the cars and the reviews, but we do not need to be criticizing other posters. There's some eggnog and cookies on the table over there. Everyone help yourself! And go ahead and spike it, if you want - as they say, it's gotta be 5 o'clock somewhere. |
|
|
Replying to: hpowders (Dec 26, 2006 5:55 am) |
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Audi A8
2008 BMW 7 Series
2009 Jaguar XJ-Series
2009 Lexus LS 460
2009 Mercedes-Benz S-Class
2006 Volkswagen Phaeton
2009 Maserati Quattroporte
2009 Mercedes-Benz CL-Class



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats