You are here:
Forums
Sedans
High End Luxury Cars

24699 messages, Last post on Nov 30, 2009 at 6:41 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.
A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.
Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.
|
Replying to: dewey (Nov 30, 2006 7:03 pm) What data did you base this conjecture on; it is not supported by the IIHS. Again, the rear-crash protection results are only one of several tests performed by the IIHS and do not invalidate any of the other tests performed by the IIHS. The Toyota/Lexus vehicles in question all have "Good" ratings in every type of crash test EXCEPT for rear-end protection (just like several competing European models), so I do not know how you would conclude that Toyota/Lexus has the largest number of unsafe vehicles when even the IIHS has not even made such a statement.
|
|
|
Replying to: shop123 (Nov 30, 2006 7:26 pm) I can understand your bitterness towards BMW. I would feel the same way if I had a lemon like yours. Fortunately I have been a very satisfied owner of BMWs for over eight years. I guess it has something to do with the fact that I never owned a 7 series. Nor do I have any desire to own a 7 series. |
|
|
The ratings of OVERALL crash safety in their "large luxury cars" category: link title 1. Audi A6 2. Lexus GS 3. Infiniti M35/M45 4. Mercedes E class 5. Cadillac DTS 6. Volvo S80 7. BMW 5 series 8. Acura RL 9. Lincoln Town Car 10. Cadillac CTS 11. Cadillac STS |
|
|
Mellow out with the shouting, dude. I never doubted you, just thought I'd ask what's that about? My official response is, if I were Toyota/Lexus, I'd take a "poor" rating, and work on that like a weakness or disease. A "marginal" or "acceptable" rating is nothing to write articles about. Tag, Two Tings! First Ting is I think some blok in Salt Lake got you to read his article by throwing "Toyota" and "anything bad" into the title. And my soupy #2 is check the front end of Toyota/Lexus cars, where the vast majority of accidents occur. Nothing less than a top mark. Not one. Toyota, and Lexus, know what they're doing. They sleep very soundly. Damn, so do I! Cool! DrFill |
|
|
Replying to: jcoby (Nov 30, 2006 7:32 pm) Toyota Motor Corp., whose vehicles earn top marks for buyer satisfaction, has more models than any other automaker ranked at the bottom of a crash-protection study. |
|
|
Replying to: shop123 (Nov 30, 2006 7:26 pm)
|
|
|
And for their "midsize luxury/near luxury cars": link title 1. Audi A4 2. Saab 9-3 3. Lexus IS 4. BMW 3 series 5. Lexus ES 350 6. Acura TL 7. Volvo S60 8. Mercedes C class 9. Saab 9-5 10. Acura TSX 11. Lincoln MKZ 12. Jaguar X-Type Blkhemi, in view of the results for the C and E as compared to Lexus models, I wonder if you are still confident that the S is safer than the LS? |
|
|
Point of clarification: "DOH" Do you mean the word as used by James Finlayson, mister double-take, in the old Laurel and Hardy flicks as a sign of exasperation or do you actually mean "duh" which needs no explanation. A small ting, but I really would like to know Actually, it's more of a play on words, as I mean "Though", but would like to say it like "DOH!" (Homer Simpson). DrFill
|
|
|
Replying to: anthonyp (Nov 30, 2006 7:39 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: dewey (Nov 30, 2006 7:37 pm) That's at the bottom of the REAR IMPACT crash study, NOT the OVERALL crash study.
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Audi A8
2010 BMW 7 Series
2008 Jaguar XJ-Series
2010 Lexus LS 460
2010 Mercedes-Benz S-Class
2006 Volkswagen Phaeton
2009 Maserati Quattroporte
2010 Mercedes-Benz CL-Class



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats