High End Luxury Cars

24700 messages, Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 12:24 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Audi A8, BMW 7 Series, Jaguar XJ-Series, Lexus LS 460, Mercedes-Benz S-Class, Volkswagen Phaeton, Maserati Quattroporte, Mercedes-Benz CL-Class, Sedan

Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.

A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.

Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.

Outline

Messages Page 2159 of 2471: 1; ...; 2156; 2157; 2158; 2159; 2160; 2161; 2162; ...; 2471; Prev; Next; Last

#21578 of 24700 Re: Tag [jcoby] by dewey Nov 30, 2006 (6:59 pm)
Replying to: jcoby (Nov 30, 2006 6:49 pm) Wow aint that a fluke! I bought a 3 and 5 series this year without knowing how superb their crash safety records were. Oh yes and both my cars unlike the Lexus LS have amazing brakes also. Makes me feel like my my wife and I own two Swedish cars Replies to this message: jcoby (Nov 30, 2006 7:09 pm)
#21579 of 24700 Re: Tag [jcoby] by dewey Nov 30, 2006 (7:03 pm)
Replying to: jcoby (Nov 30, 2006 6:49 pm) I hear what you are saying and it makes a lot of sense. But as Tagman said all car companies are measured by these new standards. Similarily reliability ratings change with time. Today a below average reliability rating in Consumers Reports does not neccessarily mean a model is a lemon. While in the 70s or 80s a below average rating almost guaranteed that a model is a lemon. Does it make sense for a 2004 MB M Class owner to boast that his auto is very reliable compared to 1970s models? No! Does it make sense to say Toyotas do not have the largest number of least safe autos because prior year safety standards were not so strict? No! If you are going to evaluate a car then you got to use the tougher criteria (reliability or safety) of today and not some softer criteria of yesterday. Replies to this message: jcoby (Nov 30, 2006 7:18 pm) jcoby (Nov 30, 2006 7:32 pm) dewey (Nov 30, 2006 7:37 pm) syswei (Nov 30, 2006 7:45 pm) and 1 more... tagman (Nov 30, 2006 7:51 pm) and 5 more...
#21580 of 24700 Re: Tag [dewey] by jcoby Nov 30, 2006 (7:09 pm)
Replying to: dewey (Nov 30, 2006 6:59 pm) Exactly! Although BMW performed very poorly overall in the rear-end crash protection test by the IIHS, the other BMW crash test ratings are stellar and I certainly would feel extremely safe in a BMW. Just like Toyota/Lexus, BMW will have some "Top Safety Pick" models once the head restraint/seat design issue is addressed in the next couple of years. A poor showing in one of many tests does not make a car unsafe, as both of us are aware of
#21581 of 24700 Re: Tag [tagman] by syswei Nov 30, 2006 (7:12 pm)
Replying to: tagman (Nov 30, 2006 6:55 pm) there should be no confusion that these new measurements are significant enough to lower Toyota/Lexus's ratings. ALL manufacturers were subjected to the same tests, not just Toyota/Lexus. Bottom line... a crack in the Toyota/Lexus armor... the bubble is leaking. Shouldn't you be saying the same about BMW? It didn't fare so well in rear crash ratings either.
#21582 of 24700 Tony by drfill Nov 30, 2006 (7:16 pm)
I found Tagman`s pictures of the S vs LS dash to be a good guide, and wonder what your thoughts are on the comparison??? Anyway just a faint supporter of the LS and a strong supporter of you Tony Thanks for the luv, Tony! Where would I be without my people, my fans? Probably building a new LS board! I am no fan of the 7's interior, and the S apes the 7 a little too much for my taste. If you're looking for something new, or better, don't look thur! BMW should be oh so flattered. If anyone wants to see a real interior, just check out pages 28 & 29 of this month's C&D. You can say what you want, but at the end of the day, Lexus can sell the hell out of a car! That Kool-Aid sure is refreshing right about now! Ahhhhhhhh! Sweet! DrFill
#21583 of 24700 Re: Tag [dewey] by jcoby Nov 30, 2006 (7:18 pm)
Replying to: dewey (Nov 30, 2006 7:03 pm) Of course "all car companies are measured by these new standards." I just took great offense at the conjecture that Toyota and Lexus vehicles are some of the most unsafe vehicles on the road because of the poor performance in the rear-end crash protection test when many of the competing European makes scored no better on these same tests. Toyota/Lexus still manufactures very safe vehicles overall, as do Audi, BMW, and Mercedes. Just please don't say that a Toyota/Lexus model is unsafe when a competing European model scores the same or worse on the same test.
#21584 of 24700 Re: Tag [tagman] by brightness04 Nov 30, 2006 (7:22 pm)
Replying to: tagman (Nov 30, 2006 6:51 pm) In case you did not notice, they are still rated "Good," the highest rating available. That is a far cry from the spin you gave: "RANK AT BOTTOM OF CRASH-SAFETY STUDY"
#21586 of 24700 Hemi by drfill Nov 30, 2006 (7:26 pm)
What was said is that the acres of GM-grade hard plastic can be acceptable in a 300C HEMI at a pricepoint of 32k. It is grossly unacceptable on a $61k car, let alone a fully-plushed $92k model. Definitely don't want to read a post like that more than once. It will definitely have to be rewritten, and neutered! You are implying the interior plastics of the LS ape those of the 300. Having driven both cars, I know you are wrong. That was your point, no? The two cars do not belong in the same sentence. Period. Funny how you can't spell the word "credibility"...... Please move on. DrFill