Sign In Join 



High End Luxury Cars

24700 messages,  Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 12:24 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Audi A8, BMW 7 Series, Jaguar XJ-Series, Lexus LS 460, Mercedes-Benz S-Class, Volkswagen Phaeton, Maserati Quattroporte, Mercedes-Benz CL-Class, Sedan



Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.

A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.

Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.



Messages Page 2095 of 2471
1
...
2092
2093
2094
2095
2096
2097
2098
...
2471
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#20936 of 24700
Re: greetings [dhamilton] by tagman
Nov 13, 2006 (9:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: dhamilton (Nov 13, 2006 9:08 am)

Thank's Pat for speaking up and keeping a good thing going....
 
To the point. Thank you's are in order here.
 
So . . .
 
THANK YOU, PAT!
 
AND . . . THANK YOU TO EDMUNDS MANAGEMENT.
 
 
 
TagMan
#20937 of 24700
Re: Quality is Job One Again for MB [dewey] by garyh1
Nov 13, 2006 (9:34 am)
Reply

Replying to: dewey (Nov 13, 2006 8:08 am)

AH, SO NICE TO BE BACK IN THE OLD CLUB ROOM AGAIN, WITH JUST A SMALL REDECORATION (MARQUES > CARS)!
 
Hi Dewey. Nice to hear from you. I too went into "read-only" mode for a while (just to be clear to everyone, not boycotting, just fell about 1700 messages behind while on vacation and never able to catch up; now Pat has given me an excuse to skip over the last 1700 messages! So if I say something already covered or miss some allusion to a previous post, please forgive me).
 
Thanks for that link to the BusinessWeek article. I raised the question in that other short-lived forum (HELV or whatever) that nobody has really answered: is the still low ratings in CR for S more based on the average of the past 3 years (which includes '04-'06), so that any improvements made in '06 got overshadowed by the well-documented problems in '04 and '05? I'd like to believe that the earlier 2 years masked any significant improvement in the last year of production; this becomes very relevant if I wanted to consider a lightly used '06 some time in the future.
 
Anyway, I am still hoping that MB has really righted themselves with the quality of the W221. This line from BusinessWeek gives me hope:
 
Since electronics problems peaked in 2002, the number of flaws has dropped 72%, to about one per car. And warranty costs are down by 25% this year. "It's about doing things right 1 million times over," says Mercedes Chief Operating Officer Rainer Schmückle.
 
But boy, all you have to do is look at the online "reader's comments" following that article and you see how far MB has to come to win back previous owners.
#20938 of 24700
Re: Quality is Job One Again for MB [dewey] by tagman
Nov 13, 2006 (9:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: dewey (Nov 13, 2006 8:08 am)

So, Dewey you are back. Now that you've got that beautiful new BMW, we're not supposed to talk about it.
 
Oh heck, keep us posted on it from time to time . . . I'm sure a little blurb or two won't destroy the forum.
 
Quote from BusinessWeek:
 
But Mercedes still has a long way to go.
 
Y'know . . . BusinessWeek is a great magazine, IMO. I subscribe to it, and love it. Remember that article about BMW I posted recently? That was also a good one, IMO.
 
That quote from the article you posted makes us realize that while MB is on the right path, the final benefits won't show up for a while yet. But it is good news, nonetheless . . . especially in the wake of the recent CR report, which can't be helpful as it extends the poor quality reputation, even though it is more of a historical data report as opposed to a current one.
 
Fortunately the current reliability is likely improved beyond what the CR report would have us believe.
 
That should mark the end of those bad CR reports for MB, as future reports should start to reflect the current improvement . . . finally.
 
Edit: I see garyh has made a good reply. Nice to see he has made it back to this HELC (?) forum.
 
TagMan
#20939 of 24700
Re: "I guess no one wants to talk anymore, huh?" [houdini1] by merc1
Nov 13, 2006 (10:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: houdini1 (Nov 13, 2006 7:00 am)

Would you believe that 1999 mesg was posted after another forum change? This board, the former HELM, now HELC isn't the original board for this type of chat. There was another board before this one and when it was closed it took some time for people to fome over to this one, the one we almost lost!
 
Thanks Pat!
 
M
#20940 of 24700
Re: Quality is Job One Again for MB [tagman] by merc1
Nov 13, 2006 (11:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: tagman (Nov 13, 2006 9:44 am)

I'm betting on the new W221 S-Class to get some good marks next year, but I still have no faith in the Bama made Benzes. For some reason (still) Mercedes-Benz USA, Mercedes-Benz in Germany and MBUSI still won't spend the money to make things "right" at the Bama plant. In just reading owners posts on MBWorld the new R/ML/GL are much better than the original M-Class, but that doesn't say much because the original was likely the worst Mercedes in history when it came to reliability and build quality.
 
True the new ML, R and GL (in that order) are built pretty well physically as far as their interiors and bodies go, especially the GL, but there are still many posts about problems with suspension (on models with Airmatic), nav systems, and even transmissions. That latter of which I don't get because other Mercedes' (E,S,SL,CLS,CL,C350 etc.) use the same tranny and there have been very few if any problems. Someone is still pinching pennies in Bama it showing up once again.
 
Now with the GL450 Mercedes made a curious decision regarding Airmatic. Every other Mercedes that has Airmatic (S550, E550, all CLS models, E63, ML63) have the adaptive damping standard, but the GL450 has just airmatic with no adaptive damping standard, to get it you have to order the off-road package. That is the only major difference between the GL450's airmatic and say the S550s, and the GL450's airmatic has been troublesome and the S550's isn't. The MBworld forums on the new S-Class has no reports of any problems and some of these owners now have over 10K on their cars. Total opposite to when the W220 was introduced.
 
With the new X5 BMW produces the same level of fit and finish here as they do in cars made in Germany. Why Mercedes won't (because I know they can) do that is beyond me. Oh well I'm not in charge of the plant. Why the ML and R have the old 5L V8 is beyond me also, a ML550 or ML450 should have been a given ditto for the R. Hopefully they'll do an early 08' model (next spring) with a sligh re-fresh next spring with the new V8(s).
 
M
#20941 of 24700
Re: Quality is Job One Again for MB [tagman] by pat HOST
Nov 13, 2006 (11:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: tagman (Nov 13, 2006 9:44 am)

Dewey and tagman - please go to the BMW 335i 2007 discussion if you want to talk about his new 335i. Sylvia was very serious about having to stay on topic. Please don't put me in a bad position.
#20942 of 24700
Welcome back, everyone! by pat HOST
Nov 13, 2006 (11:56 am)
Reply
Good to see you!
 
(Tagman, I knew drfill was kidding, btw.)
#20943 of 24700
Re: Welcome back, everyone! [pat] by tagman
Nov 13, 2006 (12:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pat (Nov 13, 2006 11:56 am)

Thanks, Pat.
 
BTW, since you're "lurking" about . . . you had suggested twice on the short-lived HELV/C forum that you have never objected to different body styles, so long as they were high end. Does that mean that I can continue some discussion with Designman regarding our Porsche quests, and with lexusguy about the high end suv's?
 
TagMan
#20944 of 24700
Re: Welcome back, everyone! [tagman] by pat HOST
Nov 13, 2006 (12:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tagman (Nov 13, 2006 12:03 pm)

If others don't object, I don't either.
#20945 of 24700
Re: Welcome back, everyone! [pat] by syswei
Nov 13, 2006 (12:15 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pat (Nov 13, 2006 12:10 pm)

Why the "management decision" to change the title from "Vehicles" to "Cars", anyway?

Messages Page 2095 of 2471
1
...
2092
2093
2094
2095
2096
2097
2098
...
2471
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement