Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans High End Luxury Cars
24700 messages, Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 12:24 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.
A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.
Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.
|
Replying to: brightness04 (Oct 18, 2006 6:32 pm) But any auto maker that uses your inflated residual argument will end up perishing due to losses or at least suffering the slow and gradual death that is afflicting the Big 3. BMW and Audi profits are healthy and growing while MB profits are going through a healthy recovery(apparently the same cannot be said about Chrysler). Fortunately such economics as you are describing above is not applicable to the three German luxury marques.
|
|
|
Replying to: blkhemi (Oct 18, 2006 2:53 pm) The 2006 G35 is also a lame duck. G35 sales should get a nice boost next year. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: dewey (Oct 18, 2006 7:17 pm) There are however three consequences of this game: (1) a higher sales revenue is booked at inception of the lease, to be followed by a $20k write-down disgorgement three years later. So long as the sales volume is expanding, the front-ending of the book (ie. more new cooked up sales than lease return coming back to roost) looks good for the current quarter. The day the sales volume drops (i.e. not enough new cooked up sales to offset write-downs from previous fake sales), the company is in trouble. That's how the domestics ran into trouble a decade ago: they had to increase volume at all cost. In other words, this particular marketting method can be either a profit booster or loss booster . . . it's a leveraged play on sales growth. (2) It allows the leasers to brag about having a car with higher MSRP: $100k vs. $80k, even if the real worth of the car (ie. the life time revenue of the car for the manufacturer) is the same $80k. (3) In states that collect excise tax based on MSRP, it results in a higer tax bill.
|
|
|
Replying to: brightness04 (Oct 18, 2006 6:32 pm) Even MORE . . . $70  (I get your point, though) TagMan
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: tagman (Oct 18, 2006 7:58 pm) edit: See your edit. Thanks for the witty reparte 
|
|
|
Replying to: brightness04 (Oct 18, 2006 8:03 pm) You're welcome.  Ever since I said that the "LS is all sizzle and no steak, and the S-Class is all steak and no sizzle" . . . all we're talking about any more is freakin' steaks, steakhouses, chunks of meat, taxes, tips, and gift certificates! What the heck's going on here? Are we opening up a darned restaurant or something? Heck, you want it medium-rare or well-done? To the point . . . I have yet to see your real numbers showing a loaded LS460L compared to an S-Class. You guys were trying to make it sound as though the prices were miles apart. And I just don't think they are. That's what this is really about. TagMan
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: tagman (Oct 18, 2006 8:32 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: unknown (Oct 18, 2006 7:06 pm) That is bunk doc. What difference does it make how many cars is in a comparo. That is absurd and a naked attempt to say that the LS430's wins are more important than the SC430's losses or the more expensive MB's wins. Apparently you didn't get my point, which was that winning a comparison and being #1 in sales have different values to different people. Yeah apparently, but the problem here is which you choose to talk about at any given time depending on the Lexi in question. That is my point, your too whishy washy with the whole comparo/sales rhetoric. Example: Lexus has stated they want to sell 30k GS a year. As far as I can tell, every month they are getting 2500 a month out of it, so even if it isn't King of The Mountain, it is successful to it's maker, and to 30k buyers. Translation: the GS doesn't win comparos or outsell the German competition so I'll pick on a new upstart and throw in the "long as it is selling" line for good measure. The SC doesn't have to win comparisons to be a success. Neither does the C-Class. Or the Lexus ES. Cop out. Plain an simple because if the SC was a comparo test winner you'd be shouting about it as you do the LS. That is far too hypocritical doc. The car doesn't outsell the German competition nor does it beat it in comparos, but it is still a success when it flunks two of your biggest test? Yeah ok. What a gloss over. Oh now the C-Class can be success, but I seem to remember correcting you C-Class sales a while back, and now it is be a success when it doesn't win comparos, but before it was a bottom feeder? If the boring LS can, consistently, win comparisons with other sexier, sportier, more powerful rides, it says something about Lexus and their ability to execute. Now comparos are important again just that quick right? I remember when the 1996 Isuzu Trooper won an 8-truck SUV comparison in C&D. Would you call the Trooper a success? No. Why? Because no one bought one. Pretty desperate to have to go back 10 years for that one to make a point in defense of Lexus. Which way is up? M
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: merc1 (Oct 18, 2006 9:13 pm) (1) many of the criteria used in a comparo are subjective rankings, not hard numbers (even hard numbers are problematic, how many tenths of an inch in shoulder room offsets how many tenths of a second to 60mph??, you get the point . So in a field of very few cars, it utterly comes down to the weight assigned to each category. Whereas in a field of many cars, because points are dependent on relative rankings, the sheer number of entries makes the rankings more meaningful. (2) Comparos with more cars also tend to involve more people, hence less likely to be beholden to the agenda of a couple individuals. (3) Comparos with more cars also tend to divest the testers' prejudice as they broaden their horizon. GS is not the only Lexus entry for a midsize luxury sedan/wagon. Just a hint: Lexus sells 110k midsize luxury sedans a year. If we want to bring the Lexus compeition to A6, 5 and E wagons into the discussion as well, Lexus sells well over 200k units of midsize luxury sedans and wagons in the US every year. Many midsize luxury sedan buyers find ES350 to be adequate, just like many 5 series buyers find 525 and 530 adequate. Enthusiasts and comparo writers may find 525xi (or was that 530xi?) an utter disaster, just like FWD ES is pathetic in handling . . . for most buyers who want to have a cushy ride while stuck in traffic, and occasionally get themselves around in snow, both cars are adequate. That is market reality. |
|
|
Replying to: merc1 (Oct 18, 2006 9:13 pm) Therefore, either side of the coin can be used, no? If a car is successful when judged against it's peers, that's good. But if it can't be sold, that bad. Are you calling the SC a failure?  Regarding the GS, let me state again, for the umpeenth time, it's not what I would've designed, but it is meeting the target numbers for Lexus, so it maybe successful TO LEXUS. I didn't say I'm THRILLED with it. It's not simantics. That's what I said before. Is it Lexus GS/ES successful, no. Is it winning comparisons, no. I'm not making excuses for it, or apologizing. It is doing the job for Lexus, but I know Lexus can do better. I'm not trying to discredit any Mercedes comparison victory. My point was if I beat on man in a race, it's not as impressive as winning the NYC Marathon. It just isn't. In the lower classes, it's harder to get a win, because you are taking on more competitors at once. In relation to Mercedes, since you are making an issue of it, I have never seen a Mercedes beat a manual tranny BMW in any comparison. So as long as Mercedes doesn't have to offer true sport in the car, they can win. The M5/6 doesn't seem to offer a manual anymore, so the E55/65/CLK55 is more attractive to performance drivers. Many would just get a pre-owned M5.  In that price range, manuals are harder to come by, which plays to Mercedes advantage, since manuals are not implemented by Mercedes. With a slushbox, the car's spirit is severely restrained, and it can never really be a driver's car. AMGs to me are bullet trains, but I wouldn't want to put a bullet train in my garage. DrFill
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Audi A8
2010 BMW 7 Series
2008 Jaguar XJ-Series
2010 Lexus LS 460
2010 Mercedes-Benz S-Class
2006 Volkswagen Phaeton
2009 Maserati Quattroporte
2010 Mercedes-Benz CL-Class
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
