You are here:
Forums
Sedans
High End Luxury Cars

24700 messages, Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 12:24 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.
A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.
Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.
|
What this only proves is that, yes, even the quality king has problems. Did anyone ever expect Dell to be in the shape it's in, the all-out king of computers? No. Toyota has problems. Just like the General. Just like Ford. Even like it's homeland competitor Mitsu. May it be corruption, scandal, or plain lack of useability/attention of the brand, they all have their problems. But Toyota's problem is unique in that it can have an X amount of recalls but their sales never waver. Sure it makes headline news, particularly here in the States. But is it a deal breaker for someone looking at that sporty Camry SE V-6? Absolutely not. OTOH, when it comes to "world domination", it's easier said than done. It's pure economic sense. GM has stables in 6 continents and 96 countries. Toyota is really a start up company in East Europe and next-door-neighbor, China. Almost obsolete in the Land Down Under. So it's gonna take more than "we're Toyota" to have the king's crown. It can be done, but not this decade.....
|
|
|
Replying to: blkhemi (Sep 20, 2006 11:59 am) I just wanted to make it clear, given the way the posts were going, that there is a distinct difference between recalls and reliability. "World domination" doesn't happen overnight. But, Toyota certainly is on a track that could get them there. There are other factors at play here, as well. Particularly regarding the energy scenario. GM has recently patented some of its hydrogen fuel engineering, and while I don't think it will necessarily hurt Toyota, I do think that it represents that the automobile industry is in such a massive and unprecedented transition, and that there will be major rewards for innovation when the dust settles . . . and GM certainly has the potential to be innovative. TagMan
|
|
|
Yep, looks like our love affair is over. The California Attorney General filed suit today against the top 6 auto makers alledging billions of dollars of damage to the CA environment because of green house gas emissions. Extorting billions from tobacco wasn't enough for these crooks. Their quest for deep pockets continues. Gimme a break! |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: blkhemi (Sep 20, 2006 11:59 am) Toyota has problems. Just like the General. Just like Ford. Even like it's homeland competitor Mitsu. Having more recalls is not the same as having poor quality. As of now, the JD-Power and Consumer Report's evaluation of Toyota cars are still top-notch. We can start the doomsaying for Toyota, after CR finds any significant change.
|
|
|
Replying to: killerbunny (Sep 20, 2006 1:02 pm) BTW: CR is for losers....
|
|
|
Replying to: tagman (Sep 20, 2006 12:21 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: dewey (Sep 20, 2006 9:49 am) Do these figures include the Ford Pinto, Torino and Mercury Capri? The figures are very real. From Detroit news: The Dearborn automaker has recalled 6.7 million vehicles worldwide since January 2005 that are equipped with a Texas Instruments speed control deactivation switch that has been linked to dozens of engine fires and has sparked numerous lawsuits. If the combined total of 6.7 million vehicles called back -- including 5.8 million in the United States -- were a single recall, it would be the fourth-largest ever, behind a 1996 Ford recall of 7.9 million vehicles for ignition switches and two by General Motors Corp., according to NHTSA data. Full link here Toyota has a long way to go before they can match the domestics for "recall all-stars".
|
|
|
Replying to: blkhemi (Sep 20, 2006 1:53 pm) Well, I've predicted before that lexicans would be defending their favorite brand from koreancarfans in 10 years or so. On the other hand, as regards JDP, most people consider the VDS more important than IQS. VDS rankings 2006 IQS rankings 2006
|
|
|
Replying to: killerbunny (Sep 20, 2006 1:02 pm) Wouldn't that be a notch below Buick and Cadillac? Luckily the individuals that designed and manufactured my “old” 99 A6 didn't read any of these publications; my A6 was more reliable than my subsequent Honda. |
|
|
Replying to: syswei (Sep 20, 2006 2:50 pm) It will be interesting to see how Hyundai does in the 2009 VDS report. Their quality has improved quite a bit since '03.
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Audi A8
2010 BMW 7 Series
2008 Jaguar XJ-Series
2010 Lexus LS 460
2010 Mercedes-Benz S-Class
2006 Volkswagen Phaeton
2009 Maserati Quattroporte
2010 Mercedes-Benz CL-Class



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats