Sign In Join 



High End Luxury Cars

24700 messages,  Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 12:24 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Audi A8, BMW 7 Series, Jaguar XJ-Series, Lexus LS 460, Mercedes-Benz S-Class, Volkswagen Phaeton, Maserati Quattroporte, Mercedes-Benz CL-Class, Sedan



Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.

A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.

Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.



Messages Page 1854 of 2471
1
...
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
...
2471
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#18524 of 24700
Re: It's a no-brainer [dewey] by ctsang
Aug 31, 2006 (11:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: dewey (Aug 31, 2006 10:28 am)

The MB badge tells people that you are rich.
#18525 of 24700
Re: It's a no-brainer [ctsang] by tagman
Aug 31, 2006 (11:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: ctsang (Aug 31, 2006 11:12 am)

The MB badge tells people that you are rich.
 
One reason that some buy a MB, perhaps, or other prestige vehicle, but certainly not the only reason. After all, Mercedes are expensive, and financial clout is a pre-requisite for the most part . . . unlike, say, a Toyota Corolla.
 
But, you'd be amazed at how many rich people drive economy cars!!!!!
 
That logic applies to anything that is expensive. A yacht or private jet also say you are rich, wouldn't you agree? But a lot of rich people fly coach!!
 
TagMan
#18526 of 24700
Re: It's a no-brainer [dewey] by lexusguy
Aug 31, 2006 (11:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: dewey (Aug 31, 2006 10:28 am)

I hate to say this but this whole idea of platform sharing between Chrysler/MB platform sounds incredibly self- destructive for the Stuttgart side of DB.
 
I thought about mentioning that. If its done right, I think they can get away with it. Sharing V6s is ok, many automakers do that. V8s however, should remain M-B exclusive.
#18527 of 24700
Re: Lexus [tagman] by houdini1
Aug 31, 2006 (11:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: tagman (Aug 31, 2006 11:11 am)

So there is some merit to the idea of creating further distance between the Lexus and Toyota marques in terms of style and design, regardless of any platform sharing.
 
Why would there be merit in this? Toyota/Lexus seems to be doing just fine with the current arrangement.
#18528 of 24700
Re: Lexus [houdini1] by syswei
Aug 31, 2006 (11:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: houdini1 (Aug 31, 2006 11:25 am)

I agree with Tagman. If a company is going to ask customers to pay more for a product, they will probably have greater success, everything else being equal, if that product is differentiated from the lower-priced product...and that includes differentiation of appearance.
 
If Rolex and Timex were owned by the same corporate parent and you bought a Rolex, wouldn't you want it to look very different from a Timex?
 
As a consumer, I don't mind platform/parts sharing between Lexus and Toyota, even though it may hurt Lexus' prestige a bit. But I do feel that there should be more of an effort to diffentiate on the basis of appearance.
#18529 of 24700
Re: Lexus [syswei] by houdini1
Aug 31, 2006 (12:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: syswei (Aug 31, 2006 11:36 am)

I guess I can see your point a little bit. But this is so far down on my priority list in making a buying decision that it hardly matters. That's all I'm saying.
#18530 of 24700
Re: Lexus [houdini1] by syswei
Aug 31, 2006 (12:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: houdini1 (Aug 31, 2006 12:37 pm)

Actually, exterior styling isn't at the top of my priority list either. I figure, most of the time is spent INSIDE the car, not admiring it from outside. If I were single maybe it would be a different story.
#18531 of 24700
Re: Lexus [syswei] by tagman
Aug 31, 2006 (1:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: syswei (Aug 31, 2006 12:49 pm)

Actually, exterior styling isn't at the top of my priority list either.
 
Wow! That's quite a departure from the vast majority of consumers. Single or not.
 
TagMan
#18532 of 24700
Re: Lexus [tagman] by syswei
Aug 31, 2006 (1:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tagman (Aug 31, 2006 1:14 pm)

If styling was my top priority, I don't think I'd be a Lexus fan!
#18533 of 24700
Re: Lexus [syswei] by tagman
Aug 31, 2006 (3:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: syswei (Aug 31, 2006 1:29 pm)

If styling was my top priority, I don't think I'd be a Lexus fan!
 
lol . . . Is this "true confessions"?
 
TagMan

Messages Page 1854 of 2471
1
...
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
...
2471
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement