Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans High End Luxury Cars
24699 messages, Last post on Nov 30, 2009 at 6:41 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.
A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.
Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.
|
Replying to: blkhemi (Aug 09, 2006 2:30 pm) The VDS is probably more important to used shoppers than new car buyers. If you lease for two years, who cares what the VDS results are? If, on the other hand, you're in the market for a just off lease 3 year old car, as a lot of people are, its relevant information. BMW's strong showing probably has something to do with the '03 3 and 5 series, which were both near the end of the line and much more reliable than the earlier MYs.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: lexusguy (Aug 09, 2006 3:40 pm) Its the other way around. Its useful for new car buyers because they can figure out how many times they will visit the dealership during next 3-4 years. Its useless for used car buyers because they want to know VDS of expired warranty cars (5-8 yrs or more) rather than 3 year olds. Steve |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: merc1 (Aug 08, 2006 9:26 pm) Actually, it's sales have tanked big time in the US. It's not the "gotta have it factor" which meant everyone bought one last year and nobody will buy one this year. I just think the 4-door coupe concept isn't flying like Benz thought it would. It hasn't lived up to expectations like the GS, which Lexus continuously screws up! The GS is a flop because of a few factors, it is underpowered, it is not as roomy as it's main competitors. The Porsche 4-door coupe concept will probably fly because Porsche is a coupe builder and porsche is a smaller scale producer.
|
|
|
Replying to: maxhonda99 (Aug 09, 2006 6:16 pm) Now the S-Class itself is new and exciting and the CLS loses back some of its sales to the S as a result. The S-Class is just that good, IMO. I do not believe that the defining difference between a 4-door coupe and a 4-door sedan is important enough for most buyers. They will choose based upon overall style, features, performance and price, mostly regardless of the use or lack of use of pillars or frames. The defining characteristic of the CLS is more about the body's curved lines and the rear treatment. Nice, but when that new S-Class sits right next to it on the showroom . . . hard to resist. Porsche, on the other hand, unlike Mercedes, would not have ANY other 4-door, and thus if you are going to buy a Porsche 4-door it is going to be what it is . . . the Panamera. TagMan |
|
|
They don't even have an international presence. Strictly a minor league sham perpetrated by Toyota on those gullible enough not to recognize a re-badged Toyota when they see one. So is the US "Minor League" now? I guess being the #1 market in the World doesn't cut it anymore. As Toyota ads say, the best New Cars make the best used cars. So I guess Lexus makes the best of the best New cars, and the Best of the best Used cars? There is no sham!  The only sham is people who resent Lexus' success, and try to tear 'em down, and sell them to others as inferior. It's hopelessly transparent, and a sure indication of a desperate and lost soul. DrFill
|
|
|
Replying to: drfill (Aug 09, 2006 7:55 pm) Apparently Lexus' horrible crime is using a few parent company engines and platforms, and selling cars in the US market. Curiously unmentioned are Cadillac, Audi, Jaguar, Acura, and Infiniti, all of whom are guilty of exactly the same thing. BMW and Mercedes escape because they are the parent company. Not because they are "better" than anyone else. |
|
|
Replying to: lexusguy (Aug 09, 2006 8:50 am) Oh most definitely. Mercedes still opts to cheap out the Amerian produced interiors for some reason. True they're better than the first generation M, but the GL/R/ML could still be better. They simply don't have the same design and feel of the German built Mercedes models. That American supplier chain is showing. M |
|
|
Replying to: dewey (Aug 09, 2006 9:59 am) Bascially. I guess he felt left out because no one was talking about Lexus. M |
|
|
Replying to: lexusguy (Aug 09, 2006 10:20 am) So does it at least *seem* like Mercedes is improving? I remember MB being much lower than that in previous years for the 3-year survey? M |
|
|
Replying to: oac (Aug 09, 2006 11:44 am) Really? Offering all sedans and SUVS is giving people variation? Not one sports car or even sporty car in the bunch and this is called variation? Nonsense. Toyota has about the most non-diverse group of buyers of any brand today! That is why they have a stick-in-the-mud image with people who don't buy Toyotas. You've got to be joking if you think Toyota offers any kind of "variation". They're the dullest, most boring mainstream brand going. Nissan and Honda are much more "diverse" and offer more "variation". Ditto for Mercedes and BMW compared to Lexus. Toyota is a lot of things, but diverse isn't one of them. M
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Audi A8
2010 BMW 7 Series
2008 Jaguar XJ-Series
2010 Lexus LS 460
2010 Mercedes-Benz S-Class
2006 Volkswagen Phaeton
2009 Maserati Quattroporte
2010 Mercedes-Benz CL-Class
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
