Sign In Join 



High End Luxury Cars

24700 messages,  Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 12:24 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Audi A8, BMW 7 Series, Jaguar XJ-Series, Lexus LS 460, Mercedes-Benz S-Class, Volkswagen Phaeton, Maserati Quattroporte, Mercedes-Benz CL-Class, Sedan



Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.

A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.

Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.



Messages Page 1740 of 2471
1
...
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
...
2471
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#17384 of 24700
Re: Merc [drfill] by merc1
Jul 31, 2006 (10:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: drfill (Jul 31, 2006 3:53 am)

Regarding the IS300, my point was to show that it was not Roadkill, as Team Europe likes to put over on these airwaves. The fact that it was a couple of points behind the vaunted 328i shows it had great driving dynamics, and deserves respect.
 
Nah it doesn't because sales and more sales is part of the Lexus mantra and the IS300 never sold well relative to its competitors and it was a total outcast among traditional Lexus buyers. The car was a Toyota in drag, nothing more. You're still using sales one minute (SC430) to defend a comparo laggard, but you'll use comparos the next (IS300) to defend a sales laggard. Sales and more sales are what Lexus fans harp about more than anything else so if doesn't at least sell decently it ain't worth mentioning in Lexusland.
 
YES, I SAID IT! The S-Class will not sell 3k a month in 2007. It'll fall to 1500-2000 a month when the new LS changes the market direction this October.
 
Oh I don't doubt this at all, I wouldn't say 1500 units, but 2K yes. There are only so many buyers for a car that starts at 90K. Now MB will at least attempt to counter with the low-priced S450 at some point.
 
There WILL be plenty of buyers who would rather pay $900-1000 a month for an LS, than $13-1400 a month for an S550.
 
And there are plenty who can't (or won't) make that jump either which is what the LS depends on for a great many of it's sales, a cheaper price!
 
M
#17385 of 24700
Re: I Read..... [ljflx] by merc1
Jul 31, 2006 (10:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ljflx (Jul 31, 2006 8:20 am)

Merc - I was really thinking the market share issue in the last 5 years. The post I was responding to used a 10 year time period.
 
Well yeah some correction was needed, but yeah in the last 5 years they haven't grown as much as everyone else, this is true.
 
This year however looks to be quite an improvement over the incremental gains from 2000-2005, but like you said before (which I agree with amazingly!) we'll have to see if they can sustain the pace. The new C-Class can't get here soon enough!
 
M
#17386 of 24700
LS vs. S lease by maxhonda99
Jul 31, 2006 (10:51 pm)
Reply
"There WILL be plenty of buyers who would rather pay $900-1000 a month for an LS, than $13-1400 a month for an S550."
 
Actually the cheaper LS has consistently leased for about the same price as a S430 for years, and in some years for more. Such as when the 2001 LS430 came out it's lease was over $1,200 for a median priced LS430 with $0 down, similar to what a S430 was in 2001.
 
And as we all know(or should know) over 50% of luxury cars are leased, so the case that the LS sells better because it's cheaper doesn't hold much water.
#17387 of 24700
Re: LS vs. S lease [maxhonda99] by merc1
Jul 31, 2006 (10:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: maxhonda99 (Jul 31, 2006 10:51 pm)

And as we all know(or should know) over 50% of luxury cars are leased, so the case that the LS sells better because it's cheaper doesn't hold much water.
 
It most certainly does "hold water" if that other 50 percent (per you) still buys instead of leasing. No on is saying that it being cheaper is the sole reason for LS selling better, only that it plays a factor in that "50 percent" estimate. A good deal of folks (right here on these boards) still "buy" cars vs leasing them.
 
M
#17388 of 24700
Re: I Read..... [tagman] by dewey
Aug 01, 2006 (5:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: tagman (Jul 31, 2006 8:13 pm)

Thanks Tagman.
 
Now for Mr. OAC who made the following comment:
CEOs driving $25K cars in America, the land of corporate
greed, and capitalism run amock, and you defend the person who posted such drivel !!!

 
Please dont shoot the messenger! Also take a few deep breaths before pounding your keyboard.
 
Brightness04 comment:
How does this in any way or shape relate to the likelihood of a buyer of Lexus LS600HL would consider a Prius as replacement?
 
I was spoofing a spoof made by LJ many weeks ago. If you choose to take my post seriously regarding Hybrid LS owners flocking to Priuses then so be it.
 
I am not saying another word about this matter until I get some Legal Counsel. GaryH where are you? Oops I think Gary only defends Lexicans?
#17389 of 24700
Re: Hey PAT, (HOST) [blkhemi] by pat HOST
Aug 01, 2006 (7:47 am)
Reply

Replying to: blkhemi (Jul 30, 2006 8:25 am)

They are still there - the link at the top of this discussion has been changed to go to the 2007 A8 reviews. You can access reviews from earlier years, though, right there on that page.
#17390 of 24700
Re: LS vs. S lease [merc1] by ljflx
Aug 01, 2006 (8:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: merc1 (Jul 31, 2006 10:57 pm)

I'll bet that the percentage is more like 75% lease 25% buy. I don't know anyone that buys these cars anymore. The whole price structure is set up for leasing.
#17391 of 24700
Report on Japan's global production by ljflx
Aug 01, 2006 (8:41 am)
Reply
For the first time more cars were built outside of Japan than inside the country. 1.55mln "Japanese" cars now built in Europe. Watch this number grow much larger over the coming years along with car sales. There's always the dismissal of the business side here but guess what - smart business sells a lot more cars than enthusiast moves do.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/01/business/worldbusiness/01cars.html
#17392 of 24700
Re: I Read..... [dewey] by oac
Aug 01, 2006 (9:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: dewey (Aug 01, 2006 5:55 am)

Please dont shoot the messenger! Also take a few deep breaths before pounding your keyboard..
 
HELM cars we talk about here don't sell for $25K. So that survey was pointless and without merit, IMO... Now you say it was a spoof... So be it, but say so next time... Woulda saved the keyboard pounding
#17393 of 24700
Re: LS vs. S lease [merc1] by oac
Aug 01, 2006 (9:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: merc1 (Jul 31, 2006 10:57 pm)

No on is saying that it being cheaper is the sole reason for LS selling better, only that it plays a factor in that "50 percent" estimate...
 
Merc1: IYO, what other reasons, other than cheaper price, makes the LS a best-seller in its class ?

Messages Page 1740 of 2471
1
...
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
...
2471
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement