Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans High End Luxury Cars
24700 messages, Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 12:24 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.
A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.
Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.
|
Replying to: designman (Jun 15, 2006 5:26 pm) Not like Phil. Never saw Tiger hit a putt like he did on #2: 2 feet short from about 12 feet. I guess 6 gazillion dollars will do that to you after a while. Oh well, if he remains disinterested in golf and Jack's pursuit, he can always slum over here on the 2 Buick Rainier threads. |
|
|
Replying to: drfill (Jun 15, 2006 5:16 pm) I do believe that is about to change big-time (in terms of sales). They are starting to infiltrate the airwaves. As consumer demand increases, which it will, they will use some of that capital to build more dealerships and soon pretty much everywhere you see BMW, Lexus and MB showrooms, an Audi will be nearby. I am excited when I hear the name "Audi" and I never was before. Will definitely drive a 6, 8 and a Q7 in my exhausting and (to other posters) nauseating search for my next vehicle, which usually begins the day after the new one is in the garage. The list of potential test-drives at this moment also includes the Porsche Cayman S. I plan on driving the new LS to see if its handling has improved. No BMW's on my list as yet. |
|
|
Replying to: reality2 (Jun 15, 2006 5:51 pm) You didn't have to. Merc 1 provided the link already to this article in post # 16384. |
|
I am going to consider it along with the new MDX and maybe the GX for purchase around Dec. Anyone have any thoughts as to whether reliability might prove more like VW, or more like Porsche? Excuse my ignorance but I don't really understand the corporate/manufacturing/design relationships between the 3 companies when it comes to the Tourareg/Cayenne/Q7.
|
|
|
Replying to: syswei (Jun 16, 2006 5:20 am) The Q7 looks like it will be a major help in the move. It's enormous! Because if that, It must be considered my current front-runner at this time. |
|
|
Replying to: ljflx (Jun 15, 2006 8:14 pm) We can wax nostalgic all we want, but the performance qualities of German cars live in the present. Write your check and get it now. Lexus heritage? Manufacturing, reliability, hybrid, price… all good things but nothing to excite the pure driver. The Autobahn and Nurburgring are alive and well… German car heritage is alive and well… a vitality that is very alluring to the people who buy these cars.
|
|
|
The Lexus VS Europeans argument on this HELM thread is heating up again, so I am throwing in my two cents as well: IMO, to be a first tier HELM, the car company must go through three stages: 1- It must have a full history of building (perceived or otherwise) exceptional products that are generally accepted by the consumers. The products must include full line of vehicles from entry level to top end. Being accepted by the general public helps to make the company profitable i.e. bread and butter. Benz and BMW have certainly got this under their belt; Lexus has done it very well. Audi has been kind of hit and miss in NA. Jaguar has basically done nothing on the entry level. 2- With the firm footing built in step 1, the company can then enhance/grow its image by building/offering more extravagant/expensive products. I believe it is very important that anyone spending his/her own money on HELM would like to feel that the car company is standing solidly behind its offering. Initially, the loyal fans trading up support these. Then as the words get out, you get the converts i.e. customers leaving the other HELMs because of the styling, performance, technology and reliability etc... I believe Audi has not totally completed this step in NA since it is not drawing people away from the other HELMs. Again, Benz is already here, and actually it must work hard to keep its customer; BMW is kind of blurring its HE offerings by focusing more on its low and mid level products, nothing wrong with this since these are already pricey/HE. Lexus is now truly deep into this step with its new upcoming LS and other various potential models such as LFX, LFA and LFC. It is also in the process of improving the image of the entire product line with more technologies, performance and styling while maintaining the top rate reliability. 3- Once became first tier HELM, the company must constantly be innovative with technologies. It must keep the entire product line fresh and competitive. Relying solely on past performance to sell new vehicles is the recipe for disaster and may end up becoming second/third tier HELM (By the way, my definition of a less than first tier HELM is a HE vehicle that is nice to have but I would not pay for it with hard earned $). For those that are knocking Lexus, just keep watching the unfolding story. Lexus fans should just ignore these comments and enjoy the ride. I am happy that Lexus is not Europeans like; after all, we live and drive in NA (except for those biz trips accross the pond). |
|
|
Replying to: designman (Jun 16, 2006 5:59 am) We can wax nostalgic all we want, but the performance qualities of German cars live in the present. Write your check and get it now. Lexus heritage? Manufacturing, reliability, hybrid, price… all good things but nothing to excite the pure driver. The Autobahn and Nurburgring are alive and well… German car heritage is alive and well… a vitality that is very alluring to the people who buy these cars. I liked the way you wrote that so much I thought I'd copy/paste it again. "alive" . . . "vitality" . . . ah yes, good words. TagMan
|
|
|
|
|
As someone who has driven Lexi over 100,000 mi-----all models I own MB's. Lexi are fine cars but also have their problem. A run of recalled trannies, sludge engines etc. No mfg is perfect. Recently made an over 700 mi 1 day trip in my late model E Class with Dynamic Seats. No comparison in the seats or driving ease in mountain conditions. Yes the LS seats are soft but No support. MB seats are harder but the real test is how YOU feel after 12 hours in the saddle. Also more accurate stearing and braking in the MB. Maintenance-------every 5'000 mi with Lexi. Every 13'000 mi with MB. Take your choice on styling. I did. Both are very good. IMHO in also comes down to-------do really want to drive or do you want to ride?
|
|
|
Replying to: merc1 (Jun 15, 2006 8:53 pm) 1) Lexus isn't half the innovator the Mercedes is and this nonsense about MB's electronics never working is total nonsense. Maybe you'd like to list all the innovations MB has brought forward since 1989 ? And stack them up against Lexus' in the same period... Let's see who wins... Pls include well-integrated into the list... No one has ever insinuated that MB electronics NEVER works... Just that they seem poorly integrated in some models... Do you recall your post commenting on how many electronic features MB are removing from their newer cars just to reduce the electronic gremlins afflicting them ? And that was only circa 2005, or thereabouts... If you don't recall, I can find it for you.... its right here on this HELM board. 2) Because they're cheaper. Read the previous posts and see what a LS430 sells for on average. If MB wins in all those area shouldnt they sell more because of a higher price? Is that what you're asking? That doesn't make any sense. The higher up in price the thinner the market is. Obviously you are wrong here. For starters, the affluent class has EXPANDED globally in recent years. Many more people can now afford to own/lease luxury cars, and you see the evidence all around you, and in luxury sedan sales growth. Secondly, a car like MB with so much more attributes than its competitors should be selling in droves, despite its higher price (heritage, class, features, performance, etc). Besides, its not like most S-class buyers pay cash for a $90K product. They mostly lease. And the difference in lease rates b/w a 65K LS430 and a $90K S500 can be a matter of a few hundred bucks (money factor, down payment, rates and incentives). I don't suppose that if I can pay $900/mth on an "inferior" LS430, I will be easily scared to pay $1200/mth for a "superior" S500. Would most buyers in this category not afford another $300 a month or so for the MB afterall most are earning in the 6-figure+ range ? Real-world pricing/leasing knocks your argument down, Merc1. Finally, MB is priced higher BCOS ............. its cost structure is higher, not bcos the car is better. I am sure you know that already... So why knock Lexus for making a product that competes at the S-class level but costs thousands LESS to produce and sell ???? Ahhhh !!!
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Audi A8
2010 BMW 7 Series
2008 Jaguar XJ-Series
2010 Lexus LS 460
2010 Mercedes-Benz S-Class
2006 Volkswagen Phaeton
2009 Maserati Quattroporte
2010 Mercedes-Benz CL-Class
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
