Sign In Join 



High End Luxury Cars

24700 messages,  Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 12:24 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Audi A8, BMW 7 Series, Jaguar XJ-Series, Lexus LS 460, Mercedes-Benz S-Class, Volkswagen Phaeton, Maserati Quattroporte, Mercedes-Benz CL-Class, Sedan



Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.

A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.

Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.



Messages Page 1641 of 2470
1
...
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
...
2470
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#16401 of 24700
Re: Potpourri... Tagman, question for you... [tagman] by oac
Jun 15, 2006 (11:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: tagman (Jun 15, 2006 10:41 am)

Mercedes is clearly more luxurious. The LS is good, but the materials seem a little flimsier and cheaper somehow, and their application and the execution of them still falls short a bit in comparison to Mercedes. The winner - Mercedes.
 
Which MB is this ??? Have you even sat in an LS recently ? Go sit in the new IS250 or 350, and check out the quality of the material in the lowest Lexus vehicle, then multiply that by a factor of 10 to get to an LS level quality. Please.... MB seats are hard, and not supple enough, IMO, which gives the nod to the LS.
 
The interior ergonomics and seats are superior in the Mercedes. The S-Class Drive-Dynamic driver's seat is particularly better than the Lexus drivers seat. The winner - Mercedes.
 
Interior ergonomics... Yikes ! No one would put the MB over the LS in ergonomics... No one. Next !
 
Technological enhancements - Certainly Lexus also has technology, but Mercedes has been a pioneer and leader in Pre-Safe, Collision impact capabilities, Distronic Plus Radar Cruise Control, Tel-Aid, Advanced Ergonomics, Night-View Assist, Electronic Stability Program, Superior braking systems, Parktronic, Dynamic Rear-View Monitor, Active Curve Illumination, Comand System, and the more typical Bluetooth, Voice Control, and Navigation technologies. The winner - Mercedes.
 
This is an easy one.... Clearly the LS is the winner. MB's problems in recent years has been ELECTRONICS, or a poor integration of the myriad of chips in the car. This is NOT an area MB can compete against the LS. The latter shines here as well. All the techo wizadry in these cars are similar, except for one thing - seemless and flawless integration... LS wins this one going away. Next
 
Safety - This is a slam dunk for Mercedes, but one small thing should be noted. Superior performance is generally an attribute of safety. Overall, no discussion necessary. The winner - Mercedes.
 
You must be referring to the old slab-sided S-class of the '90s. Today's MB is not any more safer than the LS. I'd say EVEN. Next
 
Overall, the S-Class is superior to the LS.
 
Obviously NOT ! MB wins outright on style (against the current gen LS, that is), safety is about even, but technology, reliability, ergonomics, and luxury are all LS... And finally, why do you suppose the LS is the undisputed #1 LUXURY car sales in America ? If MB wins on all these areas you give to them, and has a higher price, won't MORE people buy it ??? Smoke that one, buddy...
 
Do you need a refresher course in MB v LS or what ???
#16402 of 24700
Once again by dhamilton
Jun 15, 2006 (11:33 am)
Reply
Not making a judgment on who is a more sophisticated customer. Merely pointing out what seems to be the difference between the Lexus vs Audi BMW Mercedes customer IMO. The Lexus fan will generally not make handling a factor, If so, they would not be considering Lexus to begin with IMO.
 I agree that styling and status are subjective so can't really put those in my argument.
#16403 of 24700
Re: Potpourri... Tagman, question for you... [oac] by tagman
Jun 15, 2006 (11:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: oac (Jun 15, 2006 11:32 am)

oac - It just goes to show how different many of us see these cars.
 
Regarding your #1 in sales thing in AMERICA only, don't forget that the Ford F-150 is AMERICA's favorite vehicle.
 
S-Class is the Heavyweight Champion of the WORLD in sales for this category we are all discussing.
 
All things considered, I'd have to say that the LS price is still a big reason to pick the LS, but the S-Class is so much more car, IMO.
 
TagMan
#16404 of 24700
Tagman by cyclone4
Jun 15, 2006 (11:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: tagman (Jun 15, 2006 10:41 am)

TagMan, first of all, I very much respect your opinion and I enjoy your thoughtful posts. I guess I tend to disagree on some of these points:
 
Luxury - To me this a toss up.
Technological enhancements - Also a toss up.
Safety - Not sure, but I'll give it to MB. Personally, I think they are about equal.
Reliability - Lexus
Style - MB
Environmental concerns - I think Lexus is the winner here.
Fuel economy - I did not mention this above, but Lexus is the winner here I believe.
 
Thus, seeing it point by point, it is a close call, but I would give the nod to the LS. I don't see a clear cut winner in my opinion. It depends on which of the points are considered more important than others. Now if you throw in the price tag, there is no longer any question.
 
The main reason I responded so strongly above is due to this stuff about history and heritage. I don't think that matters at all. It is a matter of "what have you done for me lately". I do believe that with the new generation of LS in a few months, Lexus will be a clear cut winner since the above points will go more in the favor of the LS (especially the LS600HL).
#16405 of 24700
Re: Potpourri... Tagman, question for you... [oac] by stevekilburn
Jun 15, 2006 (12:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: oac (Jun 15, 2006 11:32 am)

Well said Oac
 
But I advise you not to raise this issue again with him on LS. When it comes to Lexus he is almost always irrational and uses most baseless and uninformed arguments.
 
The wise among us know these people who keep parroting "heritage, heritage, heritage"... like a never ending puppet.
 
I say china and India have a 5000 yr heritage. Does any one give a sh** when buying products from these countries.
#16406 of 24700
Re: Potpourri... Tagman, question for you... [oac] by cyclone4
Jun 15, 2006 (12:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: oac (Jun 15, 2006 11:32 am)

Oac,
 
You obviously made it more of a slam dunk for the LS as the winner than I did. You are obviously much more familiar with the idiosyncrasies and features than I am. Since I was not sure about the electronic problems on the MB, I did not bring that up with TagMan. Also, perhaps that goes along with the general title of reliability.
 
"Thank you for your support"!
#16407 of 24700
Re: A very interesting and timely article! [merc1] by lexusguy
Jun 15, 2006 (1:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: merc1 (Jun 14, 2006 10:25 pm)

The "premium" brands of BMW, Porsche, Audi and Mercedes-Benz, and for the time being Range Rover and Volvo, are superior to mere luxury cars like Lexus, Infiniti, Cadillac, Jaguar, and Rolls Royce
 
Ok, there are some MAJOR problems with that sentence. I'll give the author BMW, Porsche, and Mercedes. Audi and Range Rover, maybe. But Volvo?? Are you kidding me? Who in their right mind thinks Volvo is a "premium" brand, above Jaguar and Rolls Royce!?
 
They go on to imply that Volvo is above Aston Martin and Maserati as well. Aston Martin and Maserati have heritage in spades, both as manufacturers and from their racing programs. How many Le Mans wins does Volvo have?
#16408 of 24700
Re: I [dhamilton] by ljflx
Jun 15, 2006 (1:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dhamilton (Jun 15, 2006 10:41 am)

You've got to be kidding me. Get real.
#16409 of 24700
Re: A very interesting and timely article! [lexusguy] by tagman
Jun 15, 2006 (1:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lexusguy (Jun 15, 2006 1:14 pm)

I'll give the author BMW, Porsche, and Mercedes. Audi and Range Rover, maybe. But Volvo?? Are you kidding me? Who in their right mind thinks Volvo is a "premium" brand, above Jaguar and Rolls Royce!?
 
Exactly . . . no one in their right mind would think that. I agree with you.
  
They go on to imply that Volvo is above Aston Martin and Maserati as well. Aston Martin and Maserati have heritage in spades, both as manufacturers and from their racing programs. How many Le Mans wins does Volvo have?
 
I agree once again. There is a serious difference in the heritage of those vehicles, and I'm glad to see you recognize heritage as a relevant attribute . . . as we are all aware of which HELM has NONE.
 
TagMan
#16410 of 24700
Re: A very interesting and timely article! [lexusguy] by ljflx
Jun 15, 2006 (1:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lexusguy (Jun 15, 2006 1:14 pm)

That sentence discreditted the whole article but his incredible partisan standing was clear anyway. Reading that article was like being at Yankee Stadium in a series with the Red Sox - you know who the crowd is rooting for. The writer thinks we are still in the 1980's and is completely lost.

Messages Page 1641 of 2470
1
...
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
...
2470
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement