You are here: Forums Sedans High End Luxury Cars

High End Luxury Cars

24699 messages,  Last post on Nov 30, 2009 at 6:41 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Audi A8, BMW 7 Series, Jaguar XJ-Series, Lexus LS 460, Mercedes-Benz S-Class, Volkswagen Phaeton, Maserati Quattroporte, Mercedes-Benz CL-Class, Sedan

Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.

A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.

Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.

#14750 of 24699 why burn with anger, when love can win all by stevekilburn Apr 12, 2006 (4:36 pm)
Replying to: tagman (Apr 12, 2006 10:31 am) Why engage in arguments. Even if Maybach is inferior to LS600hL, those of us who want Maybach will get one and those of us who want Lexus will get one too.   Love is in the eyes of loveholder.   Both lexus and My-bug are great. Only thing is Lexus is like Angelina Jolie while Mybug is like Anna-Nicole Smith Replies to this message: tagman (Apr 12, 2006 8:02 pm)
#14751 of 24699 Some intimate pictures of the LS600hL by oac Apr 12, 2006 (4:59 pm)
Here are some pics of the LS600hL AWD.. Amazing pics, if you ask me...
#14752 of 24699 I don't know! by drfill Apr 12, 2006 (5:04 pm)
Replies to this message: oac (Apr 12, 2006 5:21 pm) merc1 (Apr 12, 2006 8:29 pm)
#14753 of 24699 Re: I don't know! [drfill] by oac Apr 12, 2006 (5:21 pm)
Replying to: drfill (Apr 12, 2006 5:04 pm) MB and BMW execs scurrying to attend a meeting about this new LS600hL... That sayz something, buddy.... Its still a full year away before this car gets here, so plenty of time to improve, refine, copy, remake, engineer, compete, etc.. any adjective that fits. This is a car the competition will *copy*, and I know how that word is a bad word around here, so I say that with all trepidation Replies to this message: merc1 (Apr 12, 2006 8:29 pm)
#14754 of 24699 Hybrid MPG by houdini1 Apr 12, 2006 (6:44 pm)
My neighbors wife drives a RX400H. She drives basically to and from work so it is virtually all city type driving. In the 8 months she has had this auto she is averaging 22 mpg. They were expecting 30 mpg. My point being that in some of these larger hybrids the real world mpg is not always as advertised. Replies to this message: ljflx (Apr 12, 2006 7:10 pm) tagman (Apr 12, 2006 7:52 pm) houdini1 (Apr 13, 2006 5:32 am) syswei (Apr 13, 2006 5:54 am)
#14755 of 24699 Re: Hybrid MPG [houdini1] by ljflx Apr 12, 2006 (7:10 pm)
Replying to: houdini1 (Apr 12, 2006 6:44 pm) I know one person that has the RX hybrid and they average 30mpg and well into the 30's on pure city driving. They love the power of the RX with this hybrid though and this is their third gen RX. It's not just about mpg anyway - it's about the power. You pay 4-8K more for a more powerful engine and a hybrid is a more powerful engine. The whole return on investment arguement holds no water with me if you are getting all that extra power. You jump 10-12K if you leap from an S430 to an S500 and you get some extra options and 30 more horses. All of a sudden a hybrid that is fully optioned out plus adds the same 30+ horses has to sell on ROI. It's $8-10K more because it's a lot more car. Replies to this message: tagman (Apr 12, 2006 7:52 pm) houdini1 (Apr 13, 2006 5:32 am) syswei (Apr 13, 2006 5:54 am)
#14756 of 24699 NY Times by ljflx Apr 12, 2006 (7:13 pm)
That linked NY Times article puts a $125K estimated price on the LS600H. But from what I've been told it's more in the $100-105K range. Misprint or does the Times really know something??   Well I'll see what I can find out. I'll be at the auto show twice now - once on business and once with family and friends.
#14757 of 24699 Re: Hybrid MPG [ljflx] by tagman Apr 12, 2006 (7:52 pm)
Replying to: ljflx (Apr 12, 2006 7:10 pm) It's not just about mpg anyway - it's about the power. You pay 4-8K more for a more powerful engine and a hybrid is a more powerful engine. The whole return on investment arguement holds no water with me if you are getting all that extra power.   ljflx, well said. In the same analogy . . . people have paid a premium for ICE displacement upgrades for years, opting for more power and paying for it, without any benefit to fuel efficiency . . . heck, traditionally we've all ended up with hungrier engines if we wanted more power. We literally paid more for the privilege of burning more fuel.   This LS hybrid is different. You get more power AND greater fuel efficiency. Do the math any way you want to. That sounds like a winning formula to me.   ljflx, you said you are on TWO lists, not just one. Which two?   TagMan
#14758 of 24699 stevekilburn???? What???? by tagman Apr 12, 2006 (8:02 pm)
Replying to: stevekilburn (Apr 12, 2006 4:36 pm) I think it's been very clear that I have not engaged in any argument . . . and I'm quite sure that the other posters would back me up on that. There must be some major misunderstanding or mix-up, cause I don't have a clue what you're talking about.   Gosh, the more I look at this LS600hL, the more I like it.   TagMan
#14759 of 24699 Re: Australian press release LS600h [blkhemi] by merc1 Apr 12, 2006 (8:21 pm)
Replying to: blkhemi (Apr 12, 2006 2:35 pm) Yeah but the Corvette does weigh a lot less like you stated and it has a manual. Does it still have the 2-3 skip feature or whatever gears it was?   I think we didn't see 500hp because at that point the MPG would have made the whole exercise pointless, IMO.   M

You are here: Forums Sedans High End Luxury Cars