Sign In Join 



High End Luxury Cars

24700 messages,  Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 12:24 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Audi A8, BMW 7 Series, Jaguar XJ-Series, Lexus LS 460, Mercedes-Benz S-Class, Volkswagen Phaeton, Maserati Quattroporte, Mercedes-Benz CL-Class, Sedan



Let's try to define this forum as being limited to luxury performance vehicles where the mainstream version in a typical configuration has an MSRP of at least $60k.

A luxury vehicle with a base price of $59k qualifies because it would typically be bought with some additional equipment, bringing the MSRP over $60k.

Vehicles like the E, 5, A6, M, or GS, even if available in certain versions over $60k, don't qualify because they are cars from companies that have higher end cars in their lineups.



Messages Page 1349 of 2471
1
...
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
...
2471
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#13476 of 24700
2006 Detroit Autoshow Report (cont) by merc1
Jan 19, 2006 (12:03 am)
Reply
Rolls-Royce - Two Phantoms on display. One short, one long. The LWB model is a big as a Peterbuilt. I'm still not a fan of this car, but its presence is undeniable. I guess beauty and grace aren't part of the Rolls-Royce theme anymore because the Phantom is neither. Why the better looking (at least in photos) 100EX (future Corniche) hasn't been shown outside of L.A. yet is beyond me.
 
Land-Rover - A winning lineup of SUVs. The best luxury SUVs going IMO. My favorite is the Range Rover Sport of course. Ford had Land Rover and Jaguar next to each other and they compliment each other nicely. Nothing new here, but a few people seemed to be shocked at the nearly 100K sticker on the Range Rover Supercharged.
 
Acura - Acura has long since been replaced by Infiniti as my favorite of the Japanese luxury three. There is nothing exciting to look at when it comes to Acura. Just nice, reliable, vehicles...no spice. The TSX and TL are nice cars, as is the RL, but they simply don't excite any way style wise. The RDX I'm sure will be a hit. Now bring on that new NSX and we'll have something to talk about here.
 
Notes, Trends and Details:
 
BMW, Maserati and Bentley all had their sedans in Dark Blue with either cream or tan leather. This just happens to be my favorite color combination for big luxury 4-doors. Some type of dark Blue or Green are my favs on these type of cars. Everyone has a Black or Silver MB/BMW etc.
 
My favorite concepts this year:
 
1. Chevy Camaro - without a doubt the best concept of the show and the best one GM has ever shown. They finally had a concept to rival the Concept Car King - Chrysler. The Camaro manages to pay tribute to the past while brining the classic ponycar theme into the future. It isn't a complete duplicate of the past like the Mustang and Challenger. That puts it ahead of those two with me.
 
2. Mazda Kabura - small, light, sleek and shaped just right. Built on the Miata chassis and very doable. There is something about the side profile and stance of this car that makes it a winner with me.
 
3. Dodge Challenger - Retro taken to far? Unlike the Camaro, the Challenger is a exact duplicate of the original. Still stunning, but not as much so in person after seeing the futuristic Camaro.
 
4. Chrysler Imperial - This car had folks mesmerized. Heavy, big, large, etc. etc. The sentiment seemed to be that since the 300 is seen as a knockoff Bentley, why not build this as a knockoff Rolls. I agree. Priced right (40-50K) this would be a hit for Chrysler. Make the 340hp Hemi standard and the 425hp version standard on the top line version.
 
5. Mini Concept - A natural follow up to the current hit. Mini should offer a hybrid IMO. That would go real well with their imagine and marketing slant on small cars.
 
6. Volvo C30 - Very Golf-like. I doubt if we'll see it here, but it will undoubtedly do well in Europe.
 
The crowds for Bentley, Rolls-Royce, Aston-Martin, Ferrari, Lamborghini and Maserati were as thick as ever. These cars draw attention no matter what they have on display.
 
Overall you get the sense the GM and Ford are really trying. Ford seems to be serious about giving Lincoln some actual cars to sell besides the age/livery cast Town Car. The MKS seems like a step in the right direction as is the MKX crossover. While Ford seems to be concentrating on more mainstream products with the Ford and Lincoln brands, GM seems to still be concentrating in niche products like the Camaro and Solstice GXP. These products won't save them. The need a mainstream hit like the Chrysler 300.
 
Don't think for a minute that the Dodge Challenger won't be in a showroom near you in summer 2007 as a 2008 model. I'd even wager that the Imperial will be built also.
 
Now the one GM concept that I saw that held the most promise (besides the Camaro) is the Buick Enclave. This is what GM needs, a good looking, modern mainstream product, not niche vehicles.
 
Some disappointments were the Bentley Continental Flying Spur, Infiniti Coupe Concept, the Chevy Tahoe's interior material quality. I expected more with all three of these considering how they each have been represented in pictures.
 
Pics to follow in a few days. There you have it, the "Merc1" 2006 NAIAS report!
 
M
 
#13477 of 24700
Re: 2006 Detroit Autoshow Report (cont) [merc1] by syswei
Jan 19, 2006 (3:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: merc1 (Jan 19, 2006 12:03 am)

Thanks, Merc1!
#13478 of 24700
Re: 2006 Detroit Autoshow Report (cont) [merc1] by pat HOST
Jan 19, 2006 (3:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: merc1 (Jan 19, 2006 12:03 am)

Super write-up, merc1, thanks!
#13479 of 24700
Once again, Merc1 by scott1256
Jan 19, 2006 (5:01 am)
Reply
we owe you. Thanks for the first person report.
 
I too wonder why the delay on the 100EX (Corniche). It is a stunner in pictures.
 
Concur on the Imperial: a huge seller if DC builds it.
 
Glad the S class looks better in the metal than in pics. What color were the S classes on display? What was it about the GL interior you didn't like?
 
On interiors: the Brits and Italians do interiors so much better than the Germans, Japanese and Americans. I concur: cream/ivory interiors look great.
 
Challenger and Camaro: best sellers in the making.
 
Time for a new CTS. Sales increased again last year: get the new model on the fast track to keep it moving. I also think the Escalade trio will bring Cadillac SUV sales back to life.
 
You mention a sense that Cadillac is missing a model. Obviously it is the Sixteen - Caddy should build it!
 
#13480 of 24700
Re: Once again, Merc1 [scott1256] by merc1
Jan 19, 2006 (5:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: scott1256 (Jan 19, 2006 5:01 am)

The S-Class models on display were Black (S550) and Silver (S65 AMG). The GL, R and ML interiors just don't have the same material quality as say CLS, CLK or new S-Class. They're much better than the original ML, but still aren't among the top of their repsective classes. Mercedes really needs to examine a Range Rover to see how a proper luxury SUV interior is done. Either that or spend the same amount of money on the Bama Benzes as they do on the German built ones.
 
Yes the British and Italians do interior better imo. They have a way of working the wood and leather in a way that the rest of the world hasn't figured out. Only Audi gets close the same "way" of doing it.
 
Just think if Chrysler can score a hit with the Challenger, Imperial and the next generation mid-size sedans! Their new found success will definitely be sustainable.
 
Yeah I want to see a true flagship car from Cadillac. The DTS ain't it.
 
M
#13481 of 24700
Re: 2006 Detroit Autoshow Report! [merc1] by hpowders
Jan 19, 2006 (5:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: merc1 (Jan 18, 2006 11:23 pm)

Merc1-Allow me to add my thanks for the comprehensive report on the auto show.
The Audi Q7 has really piqued my interest.
Should be a big hit in the $50-60K luxury SUV category.
#13482 of 24700
Thanks! by merc1
Jan 19, 2006 (5:40 am)
Reply
I'm glad you all enjoyed it.
 
HD - The Q7 is a nice vehicle for sure. Now if gas prices don't spike to high the spring/summer Audi, Mercedes and Cadillac should all find plenty of buyers for their new SUVs.
 
A few other things:
 
Bugatti wasn't there. I was looking foward to seeing this million dollar, 16-cylinder car in person. Of course it was being shown in L.A. which will likely be its biggest market. I can understand that I guess.
 
VW has two displays, one on the upper level and one on the lower level. The Phaeton was on the lower level and locked up tight. It is a goodbye for this car for sure though people seemed interested in it.
 
OMG Geely, the Chinese brand! I predict utter failure for this venture. I wouldn't be so sure the Chinese brand that come over after Geely will fail however. I think they'll know better than to bring over such a dated, forgettable car.
 
M
#13483 of 24700
Re: Century V-12 engine age [rayng] by lexusguy
Jan 19, 2006 (6:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: rayng (Jan 18, 2006 6:08 pm)

Japanese collector cars are currently few and far between. The only ones really right now are the original Toyota FJ-40 Land Cruisers, and of course the Toyota 2000GT sports car.
 
The S8 and S65 are nice cars, but not collector cars. They certainly arent something you should buy as an investment. I also shudder to think how expensive it would be to try and maintain a 30 or 40 year old Audi MMI or Mercedes COMAND system.
#13484 of 24700
Re: Century V-12 [lexusguy] by scott1256
Jan 19, 2006 (6:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: lexusguy (Jan 19, 2006 6:32 am)

IMO if Toyota sent the Century to the USA it would find a ready market.
 
I suppose that won't happen.
#13485 of 24700
Re: 2006 Detroit Autoshow Report (cont) [merc1] by lexusguy
Jan 19, 2006 (6:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: merc1 (Jan 19, 2006 12:03 am)

"Ford seems to be serious about giving Lincoln some actual cars to sell besides the age/livery cast Town Car. The MKS seems like a step in the right direction as is the MKX crossover."
 
Really? I didnt get that impression at all. First of all, the nonsensical, last minute change from Aviator and Continental to "MKS" and "MKX" is probably one of the dumbest things they could possibly do. The MKX is entirely a bandwagon vehicle that is 10 years to late, and has absolutely nothing to set it apart from the competition, nor does it look anything like a Lincoln. Its some kind of hodge-podge rip-off of 18 other crossovers currently on sale. Its actually less interesting than the Ford Freestyle, I didnt think that was possible.
 
The MKS is actually worse, I think. Its like a GS430, minus all of the styling excitement. They took this:
 

 
And ended up with this. Talk about a step backwards.
 

Messages Page 1349 of 2471
1
...
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
...
2471
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement