You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Buick LeSabre
Buick LeSabre

1497 messages, Last post on Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM
You are in the Buick LeSabre Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
|
|---|---|
|
My dealer was replacing rear struts on LeSabres back in 92 93 to satisfy some customers, using Pontiac SSE or something like that struts. They were the last ones without air leveling in the rear. The dealer put those Pontiac struts on to stop the front-back wallow the soft LeSabres had. In my 98 with air leveling on rear is much stiffer than 93 Custom was. I replaced 93 struts at 35 K because I couldn't stand the soft wallow it had. Replacements fixed the problem. (Monroe struts.)Replacements were same for Pontiac, Olds and Buick cars... It did not have air leveling on rear. Just traded it for 03 Limited. New one is almost too stiff. But only has a few miles on it. What an evolution in ride. |
|
| I have a 2002 LaSabre and the AM Radio reception is awful, static and noise. I have had the radio replaced once and now the dealer says it is due to the poor reception in the Poughkeepsie area--funny my wife has no problem with her 1989 Olds. Has anyone else been experiencing this problem? I would like to know how to get in touch with Buick to seek their help. | |
|
You may wish to have the dealer check for breaks in the circuitry of your rear window defroster. It definitely affects radio reception and in my case I got a brand new rear window for my '00 Bonneville under warranty because of that problem. When I turned on the rear window defroster the AM reception was complete static. FM was unaffected. Good luck Ken |
|
|
Well, yes I would say so. One must remember that the pre-2000 LeSabre & Bonneville are completely different cars than the '99 and older models. As such, you may be able to tighten your '94 LeSabre up with Bonneville parts from the same or a close model year. imidazol97- Too stiff? I've ridden in a 2002 LeSabre with the standard suspension, and another with the GT suspension and I can't imagine how you could even remotely use the word "stiff" in describing either. Boy, you really must be used to a floaty, sailboat ride! |
|
|
|
|
"even remotely use the word "stiff" in describing either. Boy, you really must be used to a floaty, sailboat ride!" Beach15: criticism accepted! You're right on. I'm used to soft 98 LeSabre Limited. Great interstates, controlled, but smooth. Hit a wavy road and it's not controlled at all. 93 was even softer. But 2003 has less than 1000 miles on it. It's taut! Michelin tires and 16 in. wheels. It's like a friend's Jetta felt driving on interstate highways. I haven't had it on Ohio sideroads with waves and hills in them yet. I like the feel of the 2003. I'd like suggestions on what struts to put on the '98. I put Monroe road sensing struts on the 93 and they were tight for 40K -- got a little soft after they were on for 100K. Does anyone have suggestions of good riding but controlled struts to use? |
|
|
|
|
I just noticed my 93 lesabre rev to 3.5 rpm while doing 80 kms. It stayed that way until I pulled over to check the tran oil. Oil was fine and the rev went back to norm. Took it to my tran mech. and under a quick scope said it could be a faulty torque converter or electrical. He also said if it was a torque converter I was looking at a 1000 dollar bill. Wont know until a full scope determines. My question is , is this a common occurence for a 93 at 177,000kms or am I being scamed? What can I do to make sure? |
|
|
|
|
Barkhouse1 At 3500 rpm at (52 mph) 80 kph, that sounds like it dropped into 2nd gear. Were you accelerating and it stayed in 2nd gear? Could just be a one-time quirk. I'd be tempted to drive it and just be alert to strangeness in characteristics. You might ask at a dealership where the service manager knows and shares info about others of year and age and mileage they are seeing -- if they have any problems or not. My service manager told me about a Century trans that was rough, drive it and if it goes out completely it costs the same to replace as if you try to troubleshoot it early. You might clear the computer by taking out the fuse for a few minutes. Disconnecting battery loses radio settings and might lose remote opener settings. My 93 with 150K miles had no trans signs like that. IT was a solid piece -- better than 98 LeSabre trans feels in the other car. Good luck. |
|
|
|
|
The first LeSabres I checked on were the 1984 and 1985 Limited sedans. I admit. They were built more solid than the 2003 Limited I just recently checked. And the older ones were longer and had more passenger room. But they were not as fuel economical as the 2003. It is equipped with a 3800 Series II V6. However, after checking under the hood, I found there is plenty of room for a bigger V6 or a V8. I did suggest this to GM for 2004. They got back to me. And they told me they are seriously considering it. There is more. The one I checked was equipped with all the standard and optional features available for the 2003 LeSabres. But due to its smaller engine, it was overpriced. I hope a bigger engine is added.
|
|
| ....do not go together well. This is a serious chassis design issue. GM would be loathe to introduce waywardness in this best-selling quiet luxury rig. That said, I hope they come up with a way to make LeSabre more powerful and more responsive. | |
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Buick LeSabre
Buick LeSabre
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2005 Buick LeSabre



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats