Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans High Performance Luxury Sedans
1038 messages, Last post on Jun 18, 2008 at 12:12 PM
You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Chavis, If this so-called hi-po Caddy won't accelerate or handle as good as the cars mentioned here, then what the hell is all that junk for then. What would be the point, Cadillac would only get humiliated trying to compete at this level. All that technology means nothing if it doesn't put the Caddy on top, it simply isn't serving its purpose. The goal of this elite group of cars is first and foremost performance. In fairness I would like to see Cadillac build a car like you've mentioned, only to see the look on the faces of Lexus, Infiniti and Acura. M |
|
|
Infiniti and Acura, what cars do they build that are better than the STS? Please tell me because I don't know any that exist. C |
|
| Reason why 2 CLK430's was because of transmission problems and others too numerous to mention. Obviously the reason why I traded up to the E55. | |
| I'm jealous, i wish I had as many cars as you!!! Anyway, what other cars did you consider besides all those MBs? Just curious. | |
|
Infinit and Acura cars have better build quality that Cadillac, that's it. A Caddy STS will outrun, out-handle and humiliate any Acura or Infiniti 4-door. Infiniti's Q45 looks like a future Lincoln TownCar. Infiniti is the sorryest of the 3 Japanese luxury cars. No argument there. I would have to probably choose the STS over any Acura or Infiniti 4-door. Although the RL screams quality in its body and paint. M |
|
|
I was thinking M5, Jag XKR, Porsche 996, Porsche '96 turbo (USED), Lotus Esprit, Ferrari 355 (USED), S500 '00. M5 and Jag lost because they weren't out yet. Porsche 996 lost because its slower and when I went to test drive it it had numerous rattles and creaks. Porsche '96 turbo lost because too expensive. Lotus Esprit lost because Wife wanted E55 instead, said that Esprit wasn't practical. Ferrari 355 Lost because same reason as Esprit(Not to mention a bit expensive). S500 lost because its just looks like it built for OLD people. And, I don't think I'm that old yet. |
|
| Can you tell me how the E55 and the M5 ride on the rough roads .Because were we live the roads are really rough in certain areas. | |
| Can't comment on the M5 but the E55 still has a very smooth ride. Its amazing considering the rims and tires and stiffened suspension. My mother has a 96 E320 and it rides almost the same. | |
| Seriously considering an E55. Has anyone checked availablity on the 2000 models yet? Thanks...Rick | |
| Has anyone found a reasonable way to buy the E55? The system seems to too demand driven to get a good deal. Maybe a lease or a trip to Germany is the only way to do it. Thanks... LJ | |
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2000 Jaguar XJR
2011 Mercedes-Benz E-Class
2011 BMW M5
2000 Mercedes-Benz E55 AMG
2010 Audi S6
2009 Maserati Quattroporte
2009 Audi S8
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
