Sign In Join 



High Performance Luxury Sedans

1038 messages,  Last post on Jun 18, 2008 at 12:12 PM

You are in the Sedans Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Jaguar XJR, Mercedes-Benz E-Class, BMW M5, Mercedes-Benz E55 AMG, Audi S6, Maserati Quattroporte, Audi S8, Sedan


Messages Page 2 of 105
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
105
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4 of 1038
Jesse by jesseliu
Aug 09, 1999 (10:37 pm)
Reply
Well,


I love my E55 and it handles very well. I can't imagine pushing it to the point where the M5 would easily out handle me. It goes almost way too fast as is. I personally like the auto because I don't want to be driving a manual all over the place. This is an everyday car and it makes a big difference. I would love to get a M5 for the weekends.
In terms of the tranny, the AMG version of the V12 tranny in the E55 responds much better than a normal mercedes tranny.
#5 of 1038
Jesse by merc1
Aug 21, 1999 (6:42 pm)
Reply
Did you have an E500 before or is this your first Benz? The E55 is the type of car I hope to someday own. If you had a E500/500E before how does the E55 compare. The old E500/500E and the current SL Roadster are at the top of the "lust object" list for me. Not that other Benzes aren't one the list, they just don't rank as high.


M
#6 of 1038
Merc1 by jesseliu
Aug 23, 1999 (4:11 pm)
Reply
no I never owned a E500/500E.(sigh) I have owned numerous Mercedes in the past. 300D '78, S500 '97 (Coupe), E320 '96, C280 '96, CLK430 '99, CLK430 '99 (number2), ML430 '99. You might want to take a look at Mercedesshop.com. There are quite a few E500 or 500E owners on that board. I believe that the normal concensus is that the E55 is much better. Of course there will be some hardcore E500 owners that disagree. : )
This is nothing against the E500. Its just that in terms of technological advances and all ... the E55 has superior technology.
#7 of 1038
Thanks by merc1
Aug 25, 1999 (9:50 am)
Reply
I'll look there, thanks Why 2 CLK430's?


M
#8 of 1038
STSi by chavis10
Sep 19, 1999 (11:01 pm)
Reply
This is a superhightech version of Cadillac's STS. Don't laugh at it because it's a Caddy and because it's front wheel drive. This car the most technologically enhanced vehicle on the road (exept for maybe the S-Class). I do like the M5, but in terms of innovative material it is no match the STSi. The STSi has:


*320-horsepower Northstar
*Enhanced StabiliTrak 2.0 chassis control system specially adapted for the high-speed, all-weather conditions
*High Intensity Discharge (HID) headlights
*Night Vision technology
*Performance seating with improved lateral support and Cervigard anti-whiplash head restraint and seat system
*18-inch open-spoke, cast aluminum wheels mated to Goodyear Eagle F1 GS Z-rated P275/40ZR-18 tires
*Larger brakes with oversized rotors, pistons and calipers
*Larger brakes with oversized rotors, pistons and calipers


Stabilitrak 2.0 is the most advanced, sophisticated stability enhance program on the market today. Now it includes, active steering effort, side slip-rate control and an enhanced version of CVRSS which now includes ransient roll control, lateral support and stability control iteration.


Sure this high-po Caddy won't accelerate as fast or handle is well as the cars mentioned in this topic. However, it well be the only all weather performance sport sedan.
#9 of 1038
If... by merc1
Sep 20, 1999 (2:44 am)
Reply
Chavis,


If this so-called hi-po Caddy won't accelerate or handle as good as the cars mentioned here, then what the hell is all that junk for then. What would be the point, Cadillac would only get humiliated trying to compete at this level. All that technology means nothing if it doesn't put the Caddy on top, it simply isn't serving its purpose. The goal of this elite group of cars is first and foremost performance. In fairness I would like to see Cadillac build a car like you've mentioned, only to see the look on the faces of Lexus, Infiniti and Acura.


M
#10 of 1038
. by chavis10
Sep 20, 1999 (4:27 pm)
Reply
Infiniti and Acura, what cars do they build that are better than the STS? Please tell me because I don't know any that exist.


C
#11 of 1038
merc1 by jesseliu
Sep 20, 1999 (5:06 pm)
Reply
Reason why 2 CLK430's was because of transmission problems and others too numerous to mention. Obviously the reason why I traded up to the E55.
#12 of 1038
jesseliu by chavis10
Sep 21, 1999 (12:34 am)
Reply
I'm jealous, i wish I had as many cars as you!!! Anyway, what other cars did you consider besides all those MBs? Just curious.
#13 of 1038
Chavis10 by merc1
Sep 21, 1999 (2:25 am)
Reply
Infinit and Acura cars have better build quality that Cadillac, that's it. A Caddy STS will outrun, out-handle and humiliate any Acura or Infiniti 4-door. Infiniti's Q45 looks like a future Lincoln TownCar. Infiniti is the sorryest of the 3 Japanese luxury cars. No argument there. I would have to probably choose the STS over any Acura or Infiniti 4-door. Although the RL screams quality in its body and paint.


M

Messages Page 2 of 105
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
105
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement